Special ReportsAll NewsFDA BriefsOncology IconsThe Targeted PulseVoices from the Field
Conference CoverageConference ListingData Dialogue with the Oncology Brothers
All VideosCase-Based Peer PerspectivesEvolving Paradigms in OncologyExpert Perspective Virtual Tumor BoardInterviewsInvestigator PerspectivesMedical World NewsPersonalized MedicinePivotal Practice Views with the Oncology BrothersPodcastsSpeaking Out
All PublicationsEvolving ParadigmsPeers & Perspectives in OncologyTargeted Therapies in Oncology
CASE-BASED ROUNDTABLEPARTNERS
CME/CEClinical TrialsEventsPrecision Medicine PerspectivesPress ReleasesSponsored ContentTreatment Resources
SUBSCRIBE
BRAIN CANCER
BREAST CANCERBREAST CANCER
GENITOURINARY CANCERSGENITOURINARY CANCERSGENITOURINARY CANCERSGENITOURINARY CANCERS
GENOMIC TESTINGGENOMIC TESTING
GI CANCERSGI CANCERSGI CANCERSGI CANCERSGI CANCERS
GYNECOLOGIC CANCERSGYNECOLOGIC CANCERSGYNECOLOGIC CANCERSGYNECOLOGIC CANCERS
HEAD & NECK CANCERS
HEMATOLOGYHEMATOLOGY
IMMUNOTHERAPYIMMUNOTHERAPY
LEUKEMIASLEUKEMIASLEUKEMIASLEUKEMIAS
LUNG CANCERLUNG CANCERLUNG CANCERLUNG CANCERLUNG CANCER
LYMPHOMASLYMPHOMASLYMPHOMASLYMPHOMAS
MPNs
MULTIPLE MYELOMA
NTRK GENE FUSIONS
SARCOMA
SKIN CANCERSSKIN CANCERS
THYROID CANCERS
Spotlight -
  • Myeloma
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Gynecologic Cancers
  • Genomic Testing
  • Melanoma
  • Genitourinary Cancers
BRAIN CANCER
BREAST CANCERBREAST CANCER
GENITOURINARY CANCERSGENITOURINARY CANCERSGENITOURINARY CANCERSGENITOURINARY CANCERS
GENOMIC TESTINGGENOMIC TESTING
GI CANCERSGI CANCERSGI CANCERSGI CANCERSGI CANCERS
GYNECOLOGIC CANCERSGYNECOLOGIC CANCERSGYNECOLOGIC CANCERSGYNECOLOGIC CANCERS
HEAD & NECK CANCERS
HEMATOLOGYHEMATOLOGY
IMMUNOTHERAPYIMMUNOTHERAPY
LEUKEMIASLEUKEMIASLEUKEMIASLEUKEMIAS
LUNG CANCERLUNG CANCERLUNG CANCERLUNG CANCERLUNG CANCER
LYMPHOMASLYMPHOMASLYMPHOMASLYMPHOMAS
MPNs
MULTIPLE MYELOMA
NTRK GENE FUSIONS
SARCOMA
SKIN CANCERSSKIN CANCERS
THYROID CANCERS
    • CASE-BASED ROUNDTABLE
    • PARTNERS
    • SUBSCRIBE

Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!

scout
Advertisement

Community Health Systems Test for Recommended Cancer Biomarkers More Often Than Independent Practices

May 26, 2022
By Nichole Tucker
Article
Conference|iSPOR

In patients with advanced non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer treated within large community health systems in the United States , biomarker testing appeared to be significantly higher compared with independent community practices, research shows.

In patients with advanced non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer treated within large community health systems in the United States (US), biomarker testing rates are similar to published reports from community health systems but appeared to be significantly higher compared with independent community practices, according to a presentation of retrospective findings given during the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 2022.

The retrospective analysis also found that the majority of patients were test for biomarkers, but many did not receive all tests recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Moreover, there was a subset of patients who remained untested.

According to Alissa Winzeler, PhD of Synapse and co-investigators, 50% of cancer care is performed at community health systems, however, biomarker testing performed at these centers is not widely known. Investigators sought to provide more information with the retrospective analysis which utilized an electronic medical record (EMR)-derived database with data multiple cancer care settings.

Overall, data came from 33 US states, over 450 hospitals, and over 1,900 oncologists.

The records included in the analysis were from patients who were treated with antineoplastic treatment, and who had their biomarker testing or lack of biomarker testing confirmed by Synapse’s Certified Tumor Registrars. The data were both structured and unstructured.

All 2,091 patients were 18 years or older with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Of the patient EMRs evaluated, 1,855 patients underwent biomarker testing for at least 1 of the recommended biomarkers. The 3 biomarkers commonly tested for in this study population were PD-L1 (81%), EGFR (77%), and ALK (71%). The 3 biomarkers that were not widely tested in the study population were NTRK1 (43%), NTRK2 (15%), and NTRK3 (43%).

Notably, 1,012 patients were tested for the 5 most common biomarkers, which include PD-L1, EGFR, ALK, BRAF, and ROS1.

A Decade of Biomarker Testing Patterns

The rate of documented biomarker testing is an area of active research that has been explored in small populations historically.

A retrospective observational of patients who received cancer care in a US Oncology Network center showed that between 2012 and 2016, EGFR testing rates were on the rise in stage IV NSCLC but still occurred in less than 50% of patients. For other common biomarkers like ALK, ROS1, PD-L1, and BRAF, rates of testing ranged from under 1% to 33%.2

Real-word data published in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology in May 2022 demonstrate an increase in the adoption of biomarker testing in the US between 2015 and 2021.3

Even with the rising numbers of oncologists ordering broad-based genomic testing in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, nearly a third of patients still do not receive the necessary testing.

The study included record of 17,513 patients with advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, of which 91.6% were treated at community-based practices. A total of 83,064 genomic biomarker test were reported during the 6-year period, but in 2015, only 28.3% received a biomarker test by next-generation sequencing. In 202, the proportion of patients who underwent biomarker testing climbed to 68.1%

Future Needs for Biomarker Testing

Findings from 2019 signaled the need for improvement of biomarker testing and education for advanced NSCLC in the real-world setting.2 In 2022, evidence suggests that the implementation of NCCN-recommended biomarker testing practices in community oncology is on an upward trajectory.3

According to Winzeler et al, future research should focus on root causes of low biomarker testing rates at community health systems specifically and explore opportunities for progress.1

REFERENCES:

1. Winzeler A, Lorenzo R, Pomerantz D, et al. Biomarker testing rates among patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated within large community health systems in the US. Presented at: 2022 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; May 15-18, 2022. Washington, DC. Abstract RWD33.

2. Nadler E, Pacilack M, Clark J, et al. Biomarker testing rates in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated in the community. J Cancer Ther. 2019;10(12). doi: 10.4236/jct.2019.1012083

3. Hess LM, Krein PM, Haldane D, et al. Biomarker Testing for Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in the USA, 2015-2021. J Thorac Oncol. 2022. Published online May 7, 2022. doi: /10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100336

Newsletter

Stay up to date on practice-changing data in community practice.

Subscribe Now!
Recent Videos
Related Content

Neoadjuvant Alectinib Promising for Resectable ALK+ NSCLC

Neoadjuvant Alectinib Promising for Resectable ALK+ NSCLC

Tim Cortese
June 3rd 2025
Article

The ALNEO trial's final analysis shows neoadjuvant alectinib is effective and well tolerated in resectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC, achieving 42% MPR and 67% ORR, suggesting a feasible perioperative option.

Read More


SACHI Trial: Savolitinib/Osimertinib Improves PFS in MET-Amplified NSCLC

SACHI Trial: Savolitinib/Osimertinib Improves PFS in MET-Amplified NSCLC

Kyle Doherty
June 2nd 2025
Article

The SACHI trial showed savolitinib + osimertinib significantly improved PFS (8.2 vs 4.5 months) vs chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated, MET-amplified advanced NSCLC after EGFR TKI progression.

Read More


Sevabertinib Shows High Response Rates in HER2-Mutant NSCLC

Sevabertinib Shows High Response Rates in HER2-Mutant NSCLC

Kristie L. Kahl
June 1st 2025
Article

Sevabertinib demonstrated high and durable objective response rates in pretreated and treatment-naive HER2-mutant NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.

Read More


Adagrasib Combo Shows Efficacy in KRAS G12C-Mutant NSCLC

Adagrasib Combo Shows Efficacy in KRAS G12C-Mutant NSCLC

Ariana Pelosci
June 1st 2025
Article

Adagrasib plus pembrolizumab improved efficacy in KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC, according to data from the KRYSTAL-7 trial.

Read More


FDA Grants Priority Review to Sevabertinib in HER2-Mutant NSCLC

FDA Grants Priority Review to Sevabertinib in HER2-Mutant NSCLC

Sabrina Serani
May 28th 2025
Article

This priority review designation for sevabertinib in previously treated HER2-mutant non–small cell lung cancer is supported by data from the phase 1/2 SOHO-01 study.

Read More


Understanding Patient Distress via EHR in Community Oncology

Understanding Patient Distress via EHR in Community Oncology

Jordyn Sava
May 22nd 2025
Article

Kat M. Aguilar, MPH, discussed the findings of the recent study evaluating the early adoption of the distress thermometer.

Read More

Related Content

Neoadjuvant Alectinib Promising for Resectable ALK+ NSCLC

Neoadjuvant Alectinib Promising for Resectable ALK+ NSCLC

Tim Cortese
June 3rd 2025
Article

The ALNEO trial's final analysis shows neoadjuvant alectinib is effective and well tolerated in resectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC, achieving 42% MPR and 67% ORR, suggesting a feasible perioperative option.

Read More


SACHI Trial: Savolitinib/Osimertinib Improves PFS in MET-Amplified NSCLC

SACHI Trial: Savolitinib/Osimertinib Improves PFS in MET-Amplified NSCLC

Kyle Doherty
June 2nd 2025
Article

The SACHI trial showed savolitinib + osimertinib significantly improved PFS (8.2 vs 4.5 months) vs chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated, MET-amplified advanced NSCLC after EGFR TKI progression.

Read More


Sevabertinib Shows High Response Rates in HER2-Mutant NSCLC

Sevabertinib Shows High Response Rates in HER2-Mutant NSCLC

Kristie L. Kahl
June 1st 2025
Article

Sevabertinib demonstrated high and durable objective response rates in pretreated and treatment-naive HER2-mutant NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.

Read More


Adagrasib Combo Shows Efficacy in KRAS G12C-Mutant NSCLC

Adagrasib Combo Shows Efficacy in KRAS G12C-Mutant NSCLC

Ariana Pelosci
June 1st 2025
Article

Adagrasib plus pembrolizumab improved efficacy in KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC, according to data from the KRYSTAL-7 trial.

Read More


FDA Grants Priority Review to Sevabertinib in HER2-Mutant NSCLC

FDA Grants Priority Review to Sevabertinib in HER2-Mutant NSCLC

Sabrina Serani
May 28th 2025
Article

This priority review designation for sevabertinib in previously treated HER2-mutant non–small cell lung cancer is supported by data from the phase 1/2 SOHO-01 study.

Read More


Understanding Patient Distress via EHR in Community Oncology

Understanding Patient Distress via EHR in Community Oncology

Jordyn Sava
May 22nd 2025
Article

Kat M. Aguilar, MPH, discussed the findings of the recent study evaluating the early adoption of the distress thermometer.

Read More

About Us
Advertise
Contact Us
CureToday.com
CancerNetwork.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
Do Not Sell My Information
Privacy
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.