Paul Helft, MD:In the very recent past, we wouldn’t necessarily have tested a patient for the presence or absence of defective mismatch repair. In recent years, we have discovered that MSI status, or mismatch repair status as conferred by especially high frequency microsatellite instability, has become a very important biomarker for a small subgroup of patients who are now very important because other therapies are available to them. So, certainly, a patient such as this at the very beginning of their illness should have their MSI status determined.
Such a patient obviously has multiple options open to him for first-line therapy. One of the first ways that we sort patients when they walk into the office with such a situation is to determine whether or not they will ever become a candidate for curative intent therapies, such as surgery. Such a patient with widespread disease is exceedingly unlikely ever to go on to undergo intervention such as surgery with curative intent. So, in such patients, our goals of therapy are different. They are to improve overall survival and progression-free survival, and to maintain their quality of life for as long as possible through the course of their illness. In such a patient, we would always consider the question of surgery. In particular, the question of whether or not the primary tumor should undergo resection or not is an important question for the 25% of patients who show up with stage 4 de novo disease. This question was and has been a relatively complicated question, having to do with things like the patient’s performance status, their risks of surgery, the burden of their disease, the location and complexity of their primary tumor resection, whether the tumor is obstructing or notor nearly obstructing—or whether there are other incidental complications such as bleeding.
Now in such a patient, some recent studies have suggested that patients through the course of their illness will never actually need to undergo such a surgery for their primary tumor. And in this patient who’s basically asymptomatic from the point of view of his primary tumor, I would not recommend that he go to surgery. As for other surgical techniques, such as metastasectomythose surgeries which are aimed at resecting metastatic disease—he obviously has too widespread disease to undergo resection.
February 2013
March 2014
Retrospective Data Demonstrates Efficacy of Regorafenib in mCRC
April 16th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, discussed recent retrospective studies that compared outcomes between the available treatment options in patients with relapsed/refractory advanced colorectal cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Peritoneal RFS May Be a Stronger Predictor of OS in CRC Peritoneal Metastasis
March 27th 2024In an interview with Targeted Oncology, Muhammad Talha Waheed, MBBS, discussed research on the reliability of using recurrence-free survival as an efficacy end point for trials evaluating patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis.
Read More
Study Finds Susceptibility Gene Variations by Race/Ethnicity in Early-Onset CRC
February 20th 2024In an interview with Targeted Oncology, Andreana N. Holowatyj, PhD, MSCI, discussed data from a study which found racial and ethnic differences in susceptibility genes for early-onset colorectal cancer, suggesting current multigene panel tests may not be accurate for diverse populations.
Read More