Douglas Tremblay, MD, discusses the factors which influence the decision to recommend cytoreduction for patients with essential thrombocytopenia and polycythemia vera.
Douglas Tremblay, MD, assistant professor of medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, discusses the factors which influence the decision to recommend cytoreduction for patients with essential thrombocytopenia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV).
According to Tremblay, deciding when to start cytoreductive therapy in patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) patients like those with PV and ET hinges on accurate risk assessment. While risk stratification tools like the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classification or the IPSET-Thrombosis score are valuable, Tremblay cautions against oversimplifying things.
He also emphasizes that different factors can indicate which patients are high-risk, including biological age and individual cardiovascular risk factors. Overall, utilizing a personalized approach to risk assessment is key when deciding on cytoreductive therapy for patients with MPN patients. Age should be considered within the context of their overall health and potential for vascular complications. With a personalized approach, experts can ensure that cytoreductive therapy is reserved for those who truly stand to benefit and avoids unnecessary treatment for others.
Transcription:
0:09 | The discussion around when to start cytoreductive therapy around chronic MPN patients with PV and ET really has to do around risk stratification. There are risk stratification schemas available, largely used through the ELN risk classification, which dictates high-risk patients older than the age of 60, or those who have a prior thrombosis. In ET, there are additional risk stratification schemas, including the IPSET-Thrombosis and the revised subset thrombosis score. These can dictate which patients are high-risk for thrombosis and then who will be benefiting from cytoreductive therapy.
0:46 | But many of these different factors exist on a continuum, such as age in particular, and what I highlighted in my talk is that there is not a difference in your risk stratification the day that you turn 61 years old, and it is very important to understand someone's biological age, including their cardiovascular risk factors that can inform their overall risk of having a blood clot in these diseases.
Connecting Spleen Volume Reduction to Survival Outcomes in MF
April 21st 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Raajit K. Rampal, MD, PhD, discussed the correlation between spleen volume responses and survival outcomes for patients with myelofibrosis in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Savona Discusses First-Line JAK Inhibition for Patients With Myelofibrosis at Risk of Anemia
April 17th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Michael Savona, MD, and participants discussed the case of a patient with myelofibrosis and moderate anemia receiving JAK inhibitor therapy.
Read More
PTCy Offers New Hope for Mismatched Stem Cell Transplants in Leukemia, MDS
April 13th 2024Jeff Auletta, MD, discussed how PTCy-based graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis offers a promising approach for expanding access to successful cell transplantation regardless of donor match or patient ethnicity.
Read More
Scott Evaluates Treatment Options for Hydroxyurea-Resistant Polycythemia Vera
March 28th 2024In a Community Case Forum event in partnership with the Washington State Medical Oncology Society, Bart Scott, MD, broke down various trials of hydroxyurea, ruxolitinib, and interferon in patients with polycythemia vera to assess outcomes such as hematocrit control and molecular response.
Read More