Anthony El-Khoueiry, MD:This patient presents with advanced disease in the sense that she had main portal vein invasion, and, certainly, the presence of main portal invasion with well-preserved liver function is an indication for treatment with sorafenib. This is typical of patients that were included in the SHARP and Asia-Pacific trials. The majority of the patients either had portal vein invasion or extrahepatic metastases, with a small subgroup of patients who had BCLC stage Bmeaning disease that’s limited to the liver without portal vein invasion without extrahepatic metastases—but had failed all local-regional modalities. Those would also be appropriate patients for systemic therapy with sorafenib.
This patient, if we go back to the case, had significant adverse events from sorafenib, initially a grade 3 hand-foot-skin reaction and then grade 3 diarrhea. My general dosing strategy is to start with the full dose of sorafenib, 400 mg/twice daily, as long as the patient has Child-Pugh grade A cirrhosis and a well-preserved performance status. However, I do recommend that patients be monitored very closely during the first 4 to 6 weeks and, if they have grade 1 or 2 adverse events that are related to sorafenib, that aggressive supportive care be instituted early on, including loperamide for diarrhea, adjustment of their diet, supportive care measures for anorexia, and topical therapy with urea-based creams for early hand-foot-skin reaction.
However, ifdespite all these supportive care modalities—patients have intolerable toxicity or grade 3 events, treatment should be held temporarily until recovery to grade 1 or baseline, and then the therapy with sorafenib should be reinstituted with a dose reduction. The classic dose reduction goes from 400 mg/twice daily to 400 mg/once daily, and then the second dose reduction would be to 400 mg/every other day, as was done in this case.
This patient was continued on sorafenib until she had verifiable radiologic progression with the development of new extrahepatic disease. But, generally, the question is when to discontinue systemic therapy. The indications are when there is verifiable radiologic progression that is not questionable, there is definitive clinical deterioration related to clinical progression of the disease, or there is a clinical decompensation of their liver cirrhosis that would render treatment unsafe or that makes the benefit from the treatment questionable. So, these would be the general indications for treatment discontinuation with systemic therapy.
Transcript edited for clarity.
January 2017
April 2017
Gholam Analyzes Treatment Outcomes for Advanced HCC in Child-Pugh B Population
April 28th 2024During a live Community Case Forum event in partnership with the Tennessee Oncology Practice Society, Pierre Gholam, MD, examined the current state of treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, looking in particular at what data is available for those with Child-Pugh B and C status who have poorer outcomes and have limited data from prospective clinical trials.
Read More