Corey J. Langer, MD:As of June of 2017, when this patient started her treatment, there were 3 available tyrosine kinase inhibitorserlotinib, gefitinib, and, a little bit more recently, afatinib. This patient was appropriately started on a TKI, specifically afatinib, which is part of the second-generation wave of TKIs that directly targetEGFR.
Afatinib is an intelligently designed agent. It has some advantages over the first-generation TKIserlotinib and gefitinib. It is an irreversible inhibitor ofEGFR. It has some activity againstT790Mas well asHER2. In an older randomized phase III trial that included both folks withEGFRmutations and nonmutated patients with some sustained benefit from first-generation TKIs, afatinib clearly outperformed placebo. The progression-free survival was nearly triple in the afatinib group. And now we have seen data comparing afatinib with chemotherapywith pemetrexed and cisplatin in the LUX-Lung 3 trial, and with cisplatin and gemcitabine in the LUX-Lung 6 trial, the latter performed exclusively in China. Both of these trials showed clear-cut, statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvements in response rate and progression-free survival. It’s important to realize that this effect has been seen globally.
LUX-Lung 7 was a very interesting trial. It directly compared afatinib with first-generation TKIsin this case, with gefitinib—and showed a clear-cut improvement in response rate, time to treatment failure, and progression-free survival. So the superiority of a second-generation TKI was established by this trial. It did not, however, show an overall survival advantage. There was a numerical benefit of about 3 months—roughly 27 versus 24 months—with a hazard ratio of 0.86. But the confidence intervals did overlap unity. When you specifically look at the exon 19 group, that population always seemed to do a little bit better—about a 4-month difference (30-plus months versus 26-plus months) and a slightly better hazard ratio of 0.83.
In my practice, afatinib has been preferentially used in patients with exon 19 mutations. If you go back to both LUX-Lung 3, which compared this agent with platinum and pemetrexed, and LUX-Lung 6, which compared this agent with gemcitabine and platinum, and look specifically at the exon 19 population, we see a consistent 10- to 12-month improvement in overall survival, specifically in individuals who had exon 19 mutations.
Transcript edited for clarity.
June 2017
March 2018
Nogapendekin Alfa Plus Checkpoint Inhibition Improves Survival in NSCLC
April 25th 2024Following its recent FDA approval in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, nogapendekin alfa has also shown overall survival benefits in addition to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Read More
Emphasizing the Need for NGS in Advanced NSCLC to Determine Treatment
April 23rd 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Joshua Sabari, MD, led a discussion on the need for next-generation sequencing to determine treatment in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non–small cell lung cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Biomarker Testing Paves the Way for Better Targeted Therapies in NSCLC
April 16th 2024At a live virtual event, Edward S. Kim, MD, MBA, discussed the evolving landscape of biomarker testing before making treatment decisions for patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Read More