
|Videos|March 4, 2014
Embolization Versus Embolization Plus Systemic Therapy in HCC
Author(s)Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses a retrospective analysis that evaluated embolization versus embolization plus systemic therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic disease.
Advertisement
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses a retrospective analysis that evaluated embolization versus embolization plus systemic therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic disease.
Clinical Pearls:
- Patients with HCC that were given only embolization fared worse than patients in the control arm, who received sorafenib alone
- The median survival in the embolization-only arm was 6-7 months while median survival in the control arm was 10.7 months
- When patients received embolization plus systemic therapy, the median survival was greater than 1 year
- The idea of combining embolization and systemic therapy needs to be studied further
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Targeted Oncology - Immunotherapy, Biomarkers, and Cancer Pathways
1
Switching From Chemoimmunotherapy When a ROS1 Result Returns
2
Building an Adequate ROS1 Workup With RNA-Based Sequencing
3
Etentamig Improves Response, Survival in Phase 3 Trial for Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma
4
Ivonescimab Bests Pembrolizumab on Overall Survival in PD-L1+ NSCLC
5


































