
|Videos|July 16, 2015
Pacritinib vs Ruxolitinib
Author(s)Ruben A. Mesa, MD
Ruben A. Mesa, MD, chair, Hematology, deputy director, Mayo Clinic, discusses pacritinib vs ruxolitinib.
Advertisement
Mesa speaks about a study that used pacritinib, instead of ruxolitinib. This drug was not chosen for this study because ruxolitinib was not indicated for patients with a platelet count under 100,000, when the trial began.
Mesa explains the difficulty of comparing data from the two drugs, but he was able to say that there are many vital benefits for splenomegaly symptoms that were presented in both phase III studies.
Ruben A. Mesa, MD, chair, Hematology, deputy director, Mayo Clinic, discusses pacritinib vs ruxolitinib.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Targeted Oncology - Immunotherapy, Biomarkers, and Cancer Pathways
1
Behind the FDA Approval: Isatuximab On-Body Injector Supports ‘Patient-Centric’ Priorities in Multiple Myeloma
2
Safusidenib Shows Durable Responses in IDH1-Mutant Glioma at 3-Year Follow-Up
3
De-Escalated Neoadjuvant HER2-Targeted Therapy Shows Durable 5-Year Survival
4
CheckMate 9LA Data Push Toward Dual Checkpoint Blockade in PD-L1–Negative NSCLC
5



























