PFS Prolonged With Continuous Enzalutamide After AR Inhibitor Progression in mCRPC

Article

According to results from the phase 3b PRESIDE trial, use of continuous enzalutamide may extend progression-free survival in men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had previously progressed on the androgen receptor inhibitor alone showed improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) on treatment with continuous enzalutamide (Xtandi) versus placebo plus docetaxel and prednisone, according to the phase 3b PRESIDE trial (NCT02288247).1

Results presented at the presented at the 2022 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium show a median PFS of 9.53 months (95% CI, 8.25-10.87) for those treated with enzalutamide versus 8.28 months (95% CI, 6.28-8.71) in the placebo arm (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96; P = .027). There was also delayed time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression at 8.44 months (95% CI, 8.18-9.00) in the enzalutamide group compared with 6.24 months (95% CI, 5.42-8.31) in the placebo group (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82; P = .002).

“These data suggest that continued treatment with enzalutamide plus docetaxel offers a clinical benefit and could be a future treatment option for some patients who progress on enzalutamide alone,” Axel S. Merseburger, MD, chairman of the Clinic of Urology at University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein in Lübeck, Germany, and lead investigator of the study, said during the presentation.

Investigators hypothesized that continuous treatment with enzalutamide may help maintain control of responsive tumor lesions and allow the addition of docetaxel to target pathways that enhance tumor growth.

A total of 273 patients were enrolled into the double-blind, open-label randomized trial, with 134 receiving treatment in the enzalutamide group and 135 in the placebo group. Patients received enzalutamide at 160 mg per day or matched placebo, docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, and prednisone at 10 mg every day. Treatment continued until disease progression.

Patient characteristics included median ages of 71.5 and 69.0 years for the enzalutamide and placebo groups, respectively, with median baseline PSA levels of 36.9 ng/mL versus 28.1 ng/mL. Most patients were White (97.8% vs 99.3%) and had a Gleason score of 8 or more (55.9% versus 57.0%). Location of metastasis was also similar between groups, with 41.9% in the enzalutamide group and 34.8% in the placebo group having bone lesions versus 21.3% and 17.8% with soft tissue metastases; 36.8% and 47.4%, respectively, had lesions at both sites.

The PFS by subgroup analysis showed consistent results to those from the overall population. Of note, no significant difference was noted for PFS outcomes in patients with baseline ECOG 0 (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-1.06) or ECOG 1 (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.48-1.15) status (P = .8404). Similar results were noted by disease location in bone only (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.71-1.84), tissue only (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81), and both locations (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39-1.00; P = .0097).

There was a greater decrease in PSA from baseline to week 13 in the enzalutamide group at —37.12% compared with 9.11% in the placebo group.

The objective response rate via RECIST v1.1 was 31.6% (95% CI, 23.9%-40.1%) in the enzalutamide group and 25.9% (95% CI, 18.8%-34.2%) in the placebo group. Complete responses were observed in 26 patients (19.1%; 95% CI, 12.9%-26.7%) in the enzalutamide group versus 17 (12.6%; 95% CI, 7.5%-19.4%) in the placebo group. Partial responses were also seen in 17 (12.5%; 95% CI, 7.5%-19.3%) and 18 (13.3%; 95% CI, 8.1%-20.3%) patients, respectively.

Investigators found the safety profile to be consistent with known profile for this AR inhibitor. Serious treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) were seen in 49.3% of patients on enzalutamide versus 38.5% on placebo, and AEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 8.8% and 6.7%, respectively. Patients dying from any cause in the enzalutamide and placebo groups accounted for 9.6% and 5.2% of each respective population.

The most common TEAEs with enzalutamide versus placebo were asthenia (34.6% vs 25.9%), neutropenia (33.8% vs 33.3%), and alopecia (32.4% vs 27.4%). Median exposure to enzalutamide was 36.1 weeks versus 30.1 weeks with placebo.

Reference

Merseburger A, Attard G, Boysen G, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, phase 3b study of the efficacy and safety of continuing enzalutamide (ENZA) in chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) treated with docetaxel (DOC) plus prednisolone (PDN) who have progressed on ENZA: PRESIDE. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 6):15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.015

Related Videos
Video 5 - "Addressing Unmet Needs and Final Perspectives on nmCRPC"
Video 4 - "Integrating ARAMIS Trial Data and Managing Adverse Events in nmCRPC Treatment"
Video 3 - "Optimizing Treatment, Biomarkers, and Chemotherapy for Patients with nmCRPC"
Video 2 - "Addressing Risks and Challenges in the Standard of Care for Patients with nmCRPC"
Video 1 - "Overview of a 75-Year-old Patient with Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer’s Case"
Related Content