John N. Allan, MD:In this patient, ibrutinib technically could have been started earlier. Its current label is after a prior therapy with rituximab or with an anti-CD20containing regimen. This patient received it in a third-line setting. Technically, he could have received this drug in a second-line setting. He could have received it earlier. Right now, there are no real good data demonstrating that it would be that effective or more effective over a chemoimmunotherapy approach in the frontline setting. There’s no indication for that, but this patient may have received it slightly earlier.
Whether or not you do that comes down to the disease characteristics. If you’ve had prolonged remissions, you’re likely to get really deep responses. Even in second-line settings with bendamustine, the response rates are known to be higher. Bendamustine and obinutuzumab seem to be more durable, but these have not been compared head-to-head. When I’m thinking about going to targeted agents, I really want to know that the disease is refractory to chemotherapy. These drugs are still effective and can be used to gain deep, durable remissions. Obviously, these marginal zone lymphomas will sometimes transform into a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, at which point ibrutinib is not going to manage that. If there’s any clinical concern of a potential for transformation at that second progression, more aggressive regimens such as the one that this patient hadR-CHOP —are a choice for treatment.
In marginal zone lymphoma, we’re really looking forward to the future of these targeted agents and potential immunotherapies as they start to come around. In the future, what’s going to be important will be learning how to use these monotherapies that we’re currently employing, as well as how they can be combined with each other, and what the safety and toxicity profiles are. In the future, I hope to see combination studies with PI3 kinase inhibitors and novel anti-CD20 antibodies, as well as studies that look into combinations of ibrutinib and Revlimid (lenalidomide). Some of these studies are currently being done. We have immunotherapies, such as PD-1 inhibitors, that have shown some effectiveness in diseases like follicular lymphoma.
Obviously, doing large studies in marginal zone lymphoma will be difficult. But even bispecifics and CAR T cellsthese things are potentially on the horizon and may be able to salvage some of these chemorefractory patients. Learning how to combine these targeted agents, learning how to employ immunotherapy-based treatments, and understanding their effectiveness in this specific disease entity will be important. Those studies are on the horizon, and we look forward to the future.
Transcript edited for clarity.
A 65-Year-Old Man With Advanced Nodal MZL
November 2014
History & Physical:
Treatment History:
November 2015
November 2017
June 2018
Later-Line CD19 and Bispecific Therapies Considered After CAR T
October 1st 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Christopher Maisel, MD, discussed third- and fourth-line therapy and barriers to bispecific therapy use in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Examining the Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment Paradigm
July 15th 2022In season 3, episode 6 of Targeted Talks, Yazan Samhouri, MD, discusses the exciting new agents for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the clinical trials that support their use, and hopes for the future of treatment.
Listen
Participants Discuss LOTIS-2 Data Based on Patient Case of DLBCL
September 16th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Christopher Maisel, MD, discussed the data behind loncastuximab and whether participants with use this treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More