
|Videos|February 18, 2014
An Analysis of the Results of the BETH Study
Author(s)Adam Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP
Adam Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP, professor of medicine, associate division chief, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, discusses the results of the BETH study
Advertisement
Adam Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP, professor of medicine, associate division chief, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, discusses the results of the BETH study, which compared chemotherapy plus trastuzumab versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus bevacizumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.
Clinical Pearls:
- Although the results of the trial were negative, the results did show that THC therapy is as good, if not better, than ACTH therapy
- The results of the BETH study are consistent with other studies
- The era of adjuvant bevacizumab for breast cancer has come and gone unless there is a way to select patients who will benefit
- Some biomarkers are in the works that may be able to be used to select patients who will benefit from bevacizumab
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Targeted Oncology - Immunotherapy, Biomarkers, and Cancer Pathways
1
FDA Accepts BLA for Ivonescimab in Pretreated EGFR-Mutated NSCLC
2
Onvansertib Triplet Shows Dose-Dependent Frontline Benefit in RAS-Mutant Metastatic CRC
3
The Targeted Pulse: New Standards in Myeloma, Melanoma, and More
4
Pembrolizumab/Lenvatinib Show Efficacy, Safety in Clear Cell Gyn Cancers
5



















