
|Videos|February 18, 2014
An Analysis of the Results of the BETH Study
Author(s)Adam Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP
Adam Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP, professor of medicine, associate division chief, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, discusses the results of the BETH study
Advertisement
Adam Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP, professor of medicine, associate division chief, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, discusses the results of the BETH study, which compared chemotherapy plus trastuzumab versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus bevacizumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.
Clinical Pearls:
- Although the results of the trial were negative, the results did show that THC therapy is as good, if not better, than ACTH therapy
- The results of the BETH study are consistent with other studies
- The era of adjuvant bevacizumab for breast cancer has come and gone unless there is a way to select patients who will benefit
- Some biomarkers are in the works that may be able to be used to select patients who will benefit from bevacizumab
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Targeted Oncology - Immunotherapy, Biomarkers, and Cancer Pathways
1
FDA Grants Traditional Approval to Pirtobrutinib in CLL/SLL
2
Durable Responses With Novel Cell Therapy TARA-002 in BCG-Naive NMIBC
3
LP-184 Demonstrates Favorable Efficacy and Safety in Advanced Solid Tumors
4
JANX007 Shows Promising Efficacy, Safety in Phase 1 Trial Update
5








































