Multifaceted Approach Used for Addressing Cardiotoxicity in Breast Cancer


A team-oriented approach based on guideline-directed therapies should be used by clinicians to address patients experiencing cardiotoxicity as a result of their breast cancer, according Jean-Bernard Durand, MD.

A team-oriented approach based on guideline-directed therapies should be used by clinicians to address patients experiencing cardiotoxicity as a result of their breast cancer, according Jean-Bernard Durand, MD, MD, FACP, FCCP, FACC, FHFSA, who delivered a presentation on the topic during the 39th Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference®.1

“The predominant cardiotoxic medications in breast cancer are anthracycline-based therapies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, trastuzumab [Herceptin], and pembrolizumab [Keytruda],” said Durand, who is a professor in the Department of Cardiology, Division of Cancer Medicine at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. “The goals of treatment, from a cardiology perspective, are very simple: keep our patients alive, keep them feeling well, and keep them out of the hospital.”

A common measurement of cardiotoxicity is an absolute 10-point decrease in left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). The current guideline-directed treatment paradigm for patients admitted with heart failure was outlined by Durand. The agents include treatment with targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system upon admission, followed by β blockers, mineralocorticoids, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2s).

According to Durand, antidiabetic agents, such as SGLT-2s, can be very useful in treating cardiomyopathy. Data show that they are able to play a much greater role for the treatment of cardiotoxicity, partially because similar pathophysiological features can be seen between diabetes and heart failure, the mechanistic effects of SGLT-2s, such as dapagliflozin (Farxiga) occurring in patients with and without diabetes, and the cardiovascular benefits of these agents being independent of glucose levels, as explained by Durand.

“I can promise you as oncologists, [over] the next 2 years, you are going to be overwhelmed by the data on antidiabetic drugs and the beneficial effects they have [for] cardiotoxicity and heart failure,” Durand said. “This is both [in terms of] preserving [ejection fraction] EF and a drop in EF.”

Treatment guidelines for patients with breast cancer note that the most used agents are in place for clinicians to monitor and address these adverse effects (AEs). For example, prior to the administration of trastuzumab, patients should undergo an evaluation for cardiac risk. If a patient is at risk of cardiotoxicity, the treating clinician should refer the patient to a cardio-oncologist.

After the initiation of treatment, the patient should be monitored for LVEF decreases every 3 months. If a patient experiences a decrease in LVEF of 10 or more points, they should be referred to a cardio-oncologist to begin either cardioprotective regimens which may or may not require treatment with trastuzumab.2

Immunotherapy-Related Cardiac Effects

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors rarely have cardiac-related AEs, but those that do occur can be life threatening, according to Durand. An example of this is that myocarditis is reported in less than 1% of patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors; however, the AE is associated with a mortality rate of up to 50%.3,4 Unfortunately, serious AEs, such as myocarditis are unpredictable, Durand said adding that early detection depends on recognizing nonspecific symptoms and close monitoring.

Durand also discussed that in MD Anderson’s Cardiology Department, patients with suspected myocarditis undergo a diagnostic workup consisting of laboratory, imaging, and procedures.1 After a biopsy, a pathologist should evaluate a variety of laboratory values including troponin T, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, and creatine kinase, among others.

The imaging workup consists of a 12-lead electrocardiogram, a single-view chest X-ray, a 2-dimensional/3-dimensional complete echocardiogram, and a cardiac MRI delayed 48 hours after symptom presentation. The procedural workup includes a right and left heart catheterization with an endomyocardial biopsy.

Clinicians should first check for troponin T when patients present with noncardiovascular immune-related AE, as noted by Durdan. If levels are less than 100 and the patient does not have any clinical symptoms, no further workup for myocarditis is needed. If troponin T levels are 100 or greater, clinicians should proceed to using the diagnostic and treatment algorithm for suspected myocarditis.

“If you are in the community, remember to develop a team [for patient care],” Durand said. “Those teams are going to include an oncologist, cardiologists, possibly a rheumatologist, and a pathologist.”

Suggested by MD Anderson, the treatment algorithm for a patient with clinically suspected myocarditis starts with stopping checkpoint inhibitor treatment and initiating treatment with steroids and plasmapheresis while waiting for the diagnostic workup. The suggested steroid treatment regimen is methylprednisolone given intravenously daily at 1000 mg of for 3 days, then 1 mg/kg per day of prednisone for 7 days. This then leads to decreasing to 0.5 mg/kg per day for 7 days, 0.33 mg/kg per day for 7 days, then to 10 mg per day for 7 days, and to finally 5 mg per day for 7 days. Plasmapheresis consists of 5 sessions preceded by endomyocardial biopsy.1

When the diagnostic workup is returned after 3 to 5 days and is positive, rituximab (Rituxan) infusion should be administered at 2, 4, and 6 weeks. If the patient had a LVEF greater than 50% after rituximab infusion, they should be treated with infliximab-axxq (Avsola) infusion at 2, 4, and 6 weeks. If LVEF is lower than 50%, mycophenolate mofetil 500 mg twice daily for 3 months. Once either of these treatment cycles is completed, clinicians should continue monitoring troponin T for a response, daily for inpatient treatment and weekly for outpatient treatment.

1. Durdan JB. Cardiotoxicity in 2022: algorithms and treatment options. Presented at: 39th Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference®. March 3-6, 2022; Miami Beach, FL.
2. Jafari L, Akhter N. Heart failure prevention and monitoring strategies in HER2-positive breast cancer: a narrative review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021;186(2):295-303. doi:10.1007/s10549-021-06096-9
3. Johnson DB, Balko JM, Compton ML, et al. Fulminant myocarditis with combination immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1749-1755. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1609214
4. Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV, et al. Fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(12):1721-1728. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923

Related Videos
Video 6 - "Current Approaches to Treatment Sequencing in HER2+ Breast Cancer"
Video 5 - "Exciting Developments in HER2+ Breast Cancer"
Video 4 - "KATHERINE: Adjuvant T-DM1 vs Trastuzumab for Residual Invasive HER2+ Breast Cancer"
Video 3 - "APHINITY Trial: Pertuzumab for Patients with HER2+ Breast Cancer"
Rebecca A. Shatsky, MD, an expert on breast cancer
Rebecca A. Shatsky, MD, an expert on breast cancer
Video 3 - "Managing Toxicities and Adverse Reactions in HR+/Her2-Low mBC Therapies"
Video 2 - "EMERALD: Underscoring Key Elacestrant Data + Subgroup Analyses for Informed Therapy Selection"
Related Content