Paul G. Richardson, MD:We’re left then with a very exciting opportunity for thinking more creatively around how to target CD38 in relapse. Obviously, daratumumab rechallenges daratumumab frequency, and all of these important moves can be very helpful to patients. So for someone who’s on daratumumab maintenance, you can simply increase the frequency of daratumumab therapy. You can add drugs to it rationally and see restoration of response. The area of daratumumab resistance, though, is particularly complicated.
For example, at the ASH [American Society of Hematology] meeting, we presented data from the isatuximab studies looking at whether CD38 levels correlate with outcome. Interestingly, the data from both phase III and phase II studies did not support that. Therefore, as you think about CD38 expression or circulating levels of CD38, obviously those are going to be low after daratumumab exposure. That raises the very important question of, what kind of antibody do you then deploy?
As you think about sequencing of antibodies, these are all important considerations to think about. Obviously, we reach for BCMA [B-cell maturation antigen]-targeting strategies after targeting CD38 has failed a patient. That’s an important new avenue, and there was a tremendous amount of data at the ASH meeting to support thatwith antibody drug conjugates, and also the cellular platforms, and so-called BiTEs [bispecific T-cell engagers].
However, I think in community practice, it’s important to recognize that these approaches remain experimental and are areas of research. Access to them may not be that easy. So with all of that in mind, when we have the advent of a CD38-targeting antibody that’s qualitatively different in its properties to daratumumab, I think that’s a very important contribution and provides us with the opportunity to think very creatively about combination strategies. So as you think about, for example, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and you use Rituxan [rituximab]/CHOP [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone], Rituxan [rituximab]/ICE [ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide], Rituxan [rituximab]/EPOCH [etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin] in sequence, it may well be that in myeloma, which in my opinion, is a much more complicated disease, you may be thinking of a different CD38 approach. In other words, you may be deploying daratumumab up front, using daratumumab in maintenance, but then you may be rationally thinking about, “I target CD38, but I might want to think about a different CD38 antibody to optimize outcome.”
Transcript edited for clarity.
Care Teams Ease Inpatient/Outpatient Transitions in Multiple Myeloma
December 5th 2024Patients with multiple myeloma face a complex, decades-long treatment journey involving care coordination, insurance challenges, and multiple providers, highlighting the need for comprehensive care plans to ensure optimal outcomes.
Read More
FDA Accepts BLA for Belantamab Mafodotin Combinations in R/R Multiple Myeloma
November 25th 2024The FDA has accepted the BLA for belantamab mafodotin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, or pomalidomide and dexamethasone, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, as supported by DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 data.
Read More
Real-World RRMM Data Explore Dose Deescalation and Outpatient Use of Teclistamab
November 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Hana Safah, MD, examined several real-world studies of dose frequency and outpatient administration of teclistamab in patients with multiple myeloma in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More