Debu Tripathy, MD:This patient does go on to receive doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab and does have a clinical response at the time of surgery. In fact, she does have a complete pathologic response, which is defined by no invasive disease in either the breast or the lymph nodes.
Neoadjuvant therapy is typically used for patients with larger tumors or node-positive tumors or if there is an interest in breast-conserving surgery. The ability to use breast-conserving surgery is much greater in patients who have a significant response, and that’s been shown very clearly in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Now, in this particular case, there’s an additional important factor, and that is that the patient has inflammatory breast cancer. Historically, the outcome with surgery up front has been very poor. The recurrence rates are extremely high. For many, many years now, even before the advent of HER2-targeted therapies, we have been using preoperative chemotherapy for these patients because of the involvement of the dermal lymphatics. It’s very difficult to know where the borders of the dermal lymphatics areif they are just involved right over the tumor or if they go further out—because the clinical changes are quite subtle, the redness and the swelling. So, it is very typical now for us to use neoadjuvant chemotherapy for these cases. Obviously, in the case of HER2-positive breast cancer, we would now add both antibodies, trastuzumab and pertuzumab.
The use of anthracyclines in the initial setting for HER2-positive breast cancer remains somewhat controversial. The data so far actually project equivalent outcomes from anthracycline or nonanthracycline therapy. If you look at the most important outcomes, which are disease-free survival and overall survival data from the older trials where anthracycline and nonanthracycline therapies were tested side by side, they show equivalent results. BCIRG-006 is the study that compared doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel along with trastuzumab to the nonanthracycline regimen of docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab. This was in the pre-pertuzumab era, but very clearly, the outcomes there were equivalent. At this point in time, there are some favorites. Some people like to use anthracyclines or feel that they might be more important for younger patients and for higher-stage disease. We don’t really have clear, definitive proof that there’s a right or wrong way to go when it comes to choosing anthracyclines or not.
Transcript edited for clarity.
60-year-old Woman WithHER2+ Inflammatory Breast Cancer
Batalini Explores Role of UGT1A1 in Patients Treated With Sacituzumab Govitecan for HR+ MBC
April 22nd 2024During a Community Case Forum live event in partnership with The Arizona Clinical Oncology Society, Felipe Batalini, MD, discussed the TROPiCS-02 trial of sacituzumab govitecan and the impact of the UGT1A1 status on adverse event frequency.
Read More
Breast Cancer Leans into the Decade of Antibody-Drug Conjugates, Experts Discuss
September 25th 2020In season 1, episode 3 of Targeted Talks, the importance of precision medicine in breast cancer, and how that vitally differs in community oncology compared with academic settings, is the topic of discussion.
Listen
Survival and Safety Outcomes Factor into Use of Sacituzumab Govitecan in HR+ Breast Cancer
March 29th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Mark Pegram, MD, discussed the TROPiCS-02 trial of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More