Joyce O’Shaughnessy, MD:This patient is a 58-year-old woman who presented with stage II breast cancer that was estrogen receptor [ER]positive and HER2-negative, with an intermediate recurrent score. She was treated with anastrozole [Arimidex] alone in the adjuvant setting. At the end of her 5 years of anastrozole, she was found to have liver metastasis. This is a bit of an unusual scenario for a woman with an invasive lobular cancer; it says to me that there must have been some component of more aggressive disease in there, such as a pleomorphic invasive lobular cancer. This probably explains, in my mind, why she developed the liver metastasis. But now she has metastatic breast cancer and is going to need a treatment option for her metastatic disease.
This 58-year-old woman presented with an invasive lobular cancer that was a T2N0 breast cancer, ER-negative, HER2-positive. I would have sent an Oncotype recurrent score for her as was done; it came back at 19. Fortunately, because of the TAILORx trial data, we have excellent high-level evidence that she will not benefit from chemotherapy. The postmenopausal women in the midrange recurrent scores really had no benefit at all from chemotherapy. We can sit down and say with a good degree of certainty that we would recommend antiestrogen therapy alone, and aromatase inhibitor would be ideal for her. I would also treat her with intravenous zoledronic acid every 6 months for 5 years per our new National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] Guidelines. We have very clear-cut evidence that she will not benefit from chemotherapy.
This case is unusual because the recurrent score was in the reassuring range; it was 19. And we would feel that the antiestrogen therapy, the anastrozole, would have a high degree of benefit for her, assuming she was adherent to the treatment. It’s a bit unusual to develop liver metastasis at the end of the aromatase inhibitor period of 5 years. She must have had an aggressive component in there, some pleomorphic invasive lobular cancer; certainly, it’s important to biopsy that disease and make sure that there wasn’t a subclone that was HER2-positive, for example. Assuming that the liver was biopsied and is the same breast cancer, estrogen receptor­positive, HER2-negative, we then think about treatment options for her. It’s very clear to me that a CDK4/6 inhibitor with endocrine therapy would be the definite standard of care for her, and this is something that we would talk to her about. In the older years, we would have considered chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in the liver, and she is somewhat symptomatic with that. But now with the CDK4/6 inhibitors, we know that she’ll get superior outcomes with CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy compared with chemotherapy first line.
Transcript edited for clarity.
A 58-Year-Old Woman With Recurrent HR+ Breast Cancer
December 2013
September 2018
Batalini Explores Role of UGT1A1 in Patients Treated With Sacituzumab Govitecan for HR+ MBC
April 22nd 2024During a Community Case Forum live event in partnership with The Arizona Clinical Oncology Society, Felipe Batalini, MD, discussed the TROPiCS-02 trial of sacituzumab govitecan and the impact of the UGT1A1 status on adverse event frequency.
Read More
Breast Cancer Leans into the Decade of Antibody-Drug Conjugates, Experts Discuss
September 25th 2020In season 1, episode 3 of Targeted Talks, the importance of precision medicine in breast cancer, and how that vitally differs in community oncology compared with academic settings, is the topic of discussion.
Listen
UGT1A1 Status Underutilized in Predicting Sacituzumab Toxicity in MBC
April 8th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Mark Pegram, MD, discussed the value of testing for UGT1A1 status in patients receiving sacituzumab govitecan for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More