Selecting an Appropriate Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Endometrial Cancer

Video

Dr Robert Holloway explains what second-line treatment regimen he would have chosen for the patient with metastatic endometrial cancer in the presented case.

Case History

June 2021

A 71-year-old postmenopausal woman presented with intermittent uterine bleeding, increased urinary frequency, and cramping over the past 6 months.

  • She noted that she underwent menopause at 52 years of age
  • She is married and has 2 adult children
  • PMH: T1D since childhood, well-controlled
  • PE: Notable for uterine tenderness upon palpation
  • ECOG PS= 1
  • Chest/abdomen/pelvis CT revealed uterine and bladder masses
  • CA-125= 38.6 U/mL
  • Endometrial biopsy results:
  • Endometrioid adenocarcinoma
  • FIGO stage IVA
  • Grade 3 (poorly differentiated)
  • IHC testing revealed mismatch repair proficiency (pMMR) and estrogen receptor (ER) negativity

July 2021:

  • Patient started carboplatin/paclitaxel (6 cycles), which was well-tolerated
  • Patient was scheduled for follow-up visits every 3 months after completion

May 2022 (6 months post–chemotherapy completion):

  • CA-125 level increased to 42.1 U/mL
  • CT revealed that the previous bladder metastatic mass increased slightly in size
  • The patient discussed targeted systemic therapy options with her clinician, and she expressed the desire to spend as much time as possible with her grandchildren.
  • They jointly decided to trial lenvatinib/pembrolizumab, with instructions to continue follow-up visits every 3 months.
Related Videos
Video 2 - "Setting Expectations + First-Line and Second-Line Treatment of Graft Versus Host Disease"
Video 1 - "Patient Case: Pathology of Graft Versus Host Disease"
Gary J. Schiller, MD, an expert on MDS
Gary J. Schiller, MD, an expert on MDS
Gary J. Schiller, MD, an expert on MDS
Gary J. Schiller, MD, an expert on MDS
Gary J. Schiller, MD, an expert on MDS
Gary J. Schiller, MD, an expert on MDS
Related Content