In this first video of the series, Neeraj Agarwal, MD, of the Huntsman Cancer Institute of the University of Utah explains the role of imaging and genomic testing in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.
After the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer, depending upon the risk of the prostate cancer—[but] especially in those who belong to intermediate- [or] high-risk localized prostate cancer—according to [the] NCCN guidelines, we obtain [a] bone scan [and/or a] CT scan of the pelvis, plus [or] minus [the] abdomen … [B]asically, we want to rule out regional or distant metastasis. But if you look at intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, when the risk of metastasis is higher, clearly there is a definite role of bone scan and CT scan. So the first step is to rule out metastasis. Once you have ruled out [metastasis], and as long as these patients are well—have a life expectancy of more than ten years—there are 3 genomic tests which can be performed.
[O]verall, what these tests … are doing is that they are helping us in determining the likelihood of metastasis and death because of prostate cancer in our patients who are considered to have localized prostate cancer today. [W]hen you are doing this testing—genomic testing—they’re actually helping us in determining whether we should treat these patients with definitive therapy or [if] it [is] safe for these patients to undergo active surveillance … That is one of the reasons we are doing this testing.
So, questions may be asked in this context. If you already [have] NCCN risk stratification in place, you have CAPRA [Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment] scores in place, why do you need these tests? Studies have shown that Decipher [Prostate] …, Oncotype DX [Genomic Prostate Score assay], and Prolaris testing can independently predict or correlate with metastasis and prostate cancer–specific mortality versus traditional NCCN risk stratification or CAPRA risk.
So, I think because of the independent nature of being able to predict prostate cancer–specific mortality, onset of metastasis, [and] onset of biochemical recurrence, there is a value of doing those tests.
These genomic tests can independently help our patients in deciding whether they want to pursue active surveillance or definitive therapy with surgery or radiation by telling them their risk of recurrence—either biochemical recurrence or metastatic disease—or their risk of dying because of prostate cancer.
BXCL701 Gains Fast Track Designation for mCRPC Treatment
February 13th 2024The FDA has granted fast track designation to BXCL701 with an immune checkpoint inhibitor for metastatic small cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer resistant to chemotherapy and showing no evidence of microsatellite instability.
Read More
First Real-World Data on Second-Generation AR Inhibitor Use in nmCRPC
September 18th 2023A review of real-world data from the DEAR study of darolutamide, enzalutamide and apalutamide for the treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is given by Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH.
Listen
Dehumanizing Language is a Top Culprit in Prostate Cancer Research
February 7th 2024In an interview with Targeted Oncology, Regina Barragan-Carrillo, MD, discussed the findings from her analysis of the Language of Respect guidelines adopted by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and how well they are followed in prostate cancer abstracts.
Read More
Significance of Early Genetic Testing in HRR-Mutated mCRPC Highlighted by Real-World Observations
January 26th 2024Individuals diagnosed with HRR gene-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving olaparib face a critical requirement for timely and consistent genetic testing to enhance treatment outcomes.
Read More