Ruben Mesa, MD, discusses crucial data from the COMFORT studies that show ruxolitinib's benefit in patients with myelofibrosis.
Ruben Mesa, MD, director of the UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses the COMFORT studies that demonstrated how ruxolitinib became a standard of care for patients with myelofibrosis.
In the COMFORT-I trial (NCT00952289), patients experienced improvements in their individual myelofibrosis-related symptoms, and most patients treated with ruxolitinib experienced a total symptom score (TSS) of 50% or greater. Moreover, patient reported outcomes showed that these patients self-reported their condition as either “much improved” or “very much improved” based on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale. Spleen volume reduction was also associated with these responses.
In the COMFORT-II study (NCT00934544), long-term findings showed that 53.4% of patients in the ruxolitinib arm of the study achieved a 35% or greater reduction in spleen volume at any time with a 0.48 (95% CI, 0.35-0.60) probability of maintaining their response at 5 years. In comparison, no patients on the best available therapy arm had a decrease in spleen volume at week 48 in the study compared with 28% of patients on ruxolitinib (P < .001).
Mesa also discusses the results of a pooled analysis of the COMFORT trials that showed patients on ruxolitinib had a longer-term overall survival (OS) compared with other therapies at a median of 3 years of follow-up (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.90; P = .01). An estimated OS at week 144 of treatment also showed stronger results for patients of ruxolitinib at 78%.
TRANSCRIPTION:
0:08 | The main studies that led to the use of ruxolitinib [for patients with] myelofibrosis goes back to the COMFORT studies, the COMFORT-I and the COMFORT-II studies. In the COMFORT-I study, ruxolitinib was compared against placebo, with primary end points for improvement of splenomegaly and symptoms. In COMFORT-II, a parallel study done in Europe, the same end points with a comparator arm of best alternative therapy [were assessed]. With each of these studies, we saw the ruxolitinib was vastly superior to both control groups for improvements in splenomegaly and symptoms.
0:40 | Over time, we've also seen that there's a strong signal that use of ruxolitinib leads to an improvement in survival, both with long-term analysis of a pooled analysis of both the COMFORT studies as well as real world evidence that has come out from the use of ruxolitinib. So, it really has become the cornerstone of therapy for myelofibrosis. [It has] now been approved a little over 10 years, whether alone or, as the field continues to evolve, with potential combinations.
Rossetti Reviews Myelofibrosis Risk Stratification and Outcome Data for Pacritinib
July 17th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, James M. Rossetti, DO, discussed the role of risk scoring and stratification tools and treatment for a patient with declining hemoglobin and platelet counts due to primary myelofibrosis.
Read More
Phase 3 VERIFY Trial Investigates Rusfertide’s Potential in Polycythemia Vera
July 16th 2024In an interview, Aniket Bankar, MD, discussed the background, design, and goals of the phase 3 VERIFY trial of the hepcidin mimetic rusfertide for the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera.
Read More
Ruxolitinib Treatment in Myelofibrosis Still Effective, Regardless of Anemia
June 21st 2024New or worsening anemia did not appear to reduce the clinical benefit of ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis patients, and the median overall survival was similar between patients with and without new or worsening anemia.
Read More
Challenging Disease Features of Myelofibrosis Lead to Use of JAK Inhibitors
June 17th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Kristen Pettit, MD, moderated a discussion on which disease features of myelofibrosis are most challenging and when to use JAK inhibitors in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More