John Mascarenhas, MD, discusses phase 3 of the SENTRY study evaluating the efficacy and safety of selinexor plus ruxolitinib in patients with JAK inhibitor treatment-naive myelofibrosis.
John Mascarenhas, MD, professor, medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, director, Center of Excellence for Blood Cancers and Myeloid Disorders, member, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai, discusses phase 3 of the SENTRY (NCT04562389) trial, a global, multicenter, phase 1/3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of selinexor (Xpovio) when given in combination with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) in patients with JAK inhibitor treatment-naive myelofibrosis.
The study is being conducted in 2 phases. In phase 1, the open-label portion of the study, enrollment has been completed and the safety and recommended dose of selinexor plus ruxolitinib was studied. Phase 1a utilized a standard 3+3 design, and phase 1b was the dose-expansion part. Phase 3 of the trial is enrolling patients with JAK inhibitor treatment-naive myelofibrosis and randomizing them 2:1 to receive the combination therapy of selinexor with ruxolitinib or placebo with ruxolitinib.
In phase 3, the primary end points are the proportion of patients with spleen volume reduction of greater than or equal to 35% at week 24, and the proportion of patients with a total symptom score reduction of greater than or equal to 50% at week 24, as measured by the myelofibrosis symptom assessment form V4.0.
Transcription:
0:09 | The study we are talking about is a global, phase 3 study. It is a randomized, double-blind study evaluating the safety and efficacy of selinexor, which is an XPL1 inhibitor, in combination with ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis. We call this the SENTRY study. So it is really capitalizing on data that has already been generated, both as a single-agent in the relapsed/refractory setting, but also in combination with ruxolitinib in phase 2, demonstrating synergy of the 2 agents in terms of spleen reduction, symptom improvement, bone marrow fibrosis reduction, and a safety profile that would suggest that durability of response can be maintained.
0:54 | So this is now the natural evolution of this agent in myelofibrosis in a phase 3 study in patients who are JAK inhibitor-naive, comparing ruxolitinib, which is the standard of care, plus selinexor, the XPL1 inhibitor, vs ruxolitinib plus placebo.
Rossetti Reviews Myelofibrosis Risk Stratification and Outcome Data for Pacritinib
July 17th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, James M. Rossetti, DO, discussed the role of risk scoring and stratification tools and treatment for a patient with declining hemoglobin and platelet counts due to primary myelofibrosis.
Read More
Phase 3 VERIFY Trial Investigates Rusfertide’s Potential in Polycythemia Vera
July 16th 2024In an interview, Aniket Bankar, MD, discussed the background, design, and goals of the phase 3 VERIFY trial of the hepcidin mimetic rusfertide for the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera.
Read More
Ruxolitinib Treatment in Myelofibrosis Still Effective, Regardless of Anemia
June 21st 2024New or worsening anemia did not appear to reduce the clinical benefit of ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis patients, and the median overall survival was similar between patients with and without new or worsening anemia.
Read More
Challenging Disease Features of Myelofibrosis Lead to Use of JAK Inhibitors
June 17th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Kristen Pettit, MD, moderated a discussion on which disease features of myelofibrosis are most challenging and when to use JAK inhibitors in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More