Up to 30% of men with prostate cancer could meet criteria for genetic evaluation for hereditary disease. The hard part, Sanjeev Kaul, MD, said at the 2018 Large Urology Group Practice Association Annual Meeting, is separating the mutations that are relevant from those that are not.
“Just identifying a mutation on one of these genes doesn’t necessarily mean that mutation is clinically significant,” said Kaul, associate professor of urology with Oakland University and William Beaumont Hospital in Royal Oak, Michigan. “You can have mutations across the entireBRCA1orBRCA2gene, but not all mutations are going to code for a protein, and not all coding mutations will actually affect the function of the gene.”
Moreover, there are benefits and drawbacks to testing. With those data, physicians can administer more accurate and effective treatment while avoiding potential hazards such as administering radiation to patients with mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations. For example, radiation has been associated with increased risk for additional malignancies in patients with Lynch syndrome, which is caused by a germline mutation in MMR genes.
Kaul noted that most germline genes have 20% to 40% penetration among patients in general, compared with 90% for those with breast cancer. In prostate cancers, germline penetration ranges from 10% to 15%, so an actionable genetic mutation is not always present. In addition, genetic testing can be expensive and although federal law prevents payers from denying health coverage on the basis of test results, high-risk patients can be denied insurance coverage. Nonetheless, Kaul is a strong proponent of genetic evaluation, and there are clinical data to support his position.
Results from the GEM study published in 2017 provide crucial evidence of the importance of inherited mutations. “This was the first study run by a urology group that told us, ‘Yes, this is something that’s important,’” Kaul said.
Investigators recruited 200 men with a family history of hereditary cancer syndromes (HCSs), 62.5% of whom had prostate cancer. Participants were screened for the presence of 25 genes associated with cancer risk, includingBRCA1/2, PTEN, ATM,andRAD51C. Roughly 42.0% of men in the study had a personal or family history of cancer that met criteria for an HCS.1
The overall mutation rate in the cohort was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.0%-9.9%), with a variations of unknown significance (VUS) rate of 35%. Most mutations were found inBRCA1/2, ATM, BRIP1,andMSH6, genes involved in DNA repair. The rate of mutations was highest in men with prostate cancer and a family history meeting strict criteria for any HCS (10.5%; 95% CI, 4.7%-23.4%).
“The prevalence of mutations varied broadly. In people with no prostate cancer, only 2.73% had a pathogenic or a malignant mutation,” Kaul said. “But in patients who had more aggressive cancer, Gleason [score of] 8 and above, or locally advanced cancer, the prevalence of these germline mutations was much higher; up to 8% to 10%.”
Previous data suggested that these mutations could play an important role in cancer risk. Findings presented at the 2016 American Urological Association Annual Meeting showed that African American men were more likely to have pathogenic and variant of uncertain significance mutations in BRCA1/2 compared with white men (7.3% vs 2.2%). Petrovics and colleagues also observed a trend toward increased frequency of metastasis for men with these mutations compared with those without them (9.4% vs 2.4%). Patients with these mutations also had a significantly shorter time to metastasis (P = .044).2
In 2014, findings from the IMPACT study showed that, using a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold of 3.0 ng/mL for detecting intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, the positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsy was 2.38% for BRCA2 carriers versus 0.71% in age-matched controls (P = .04). The PPV among BRCA2 mutation carriers was 48%, double what had been reported in previous population-screening studies.3
In IMPACT, Bancroft and colleagues recruited men aged 40 to 69 years with germlineBRCA1/2mutations and a control group of men negative for a pathogenicBRCA1orBRCA2mutation that was known to be present in their families. The cohort included 791BRCA1carriers, 531BRCA1controls (men who had a negative predictive genetic test for theBRCA1mutation in their family), 731BRCA2carriers, and 428BRCA2controls.
All participants underwent PSA testing at enrollment, and those with PSA >3 ng/mL (n = 199) were offered prostate biopsy. Of the 162 men who underwent biopsy, 59 received a prostate cancer diagnosis. Eighteen wereBRCA1carriers, 10 wereBRCA1controls, 24 wereBRCA2carriers, and 7 wereBRCA2controls. Sixty-six percent of cancers were intermediate or high risk.
“The PSA was higher in theBRCA-mutated group and the positive predictive value of a biopsy in theBRCA-mutated group,” Kaul added.
Clinical research consistently shows that patients with these germline mutations have poorer outcomes, Kaul said. Furthermore, the data have shown repeatedly thatBRCA1/2are the most impactful genes in hereditary cancer. Patients with these mutations have a higher prevalence of disease, and in addition, their disease is more aggressive.
Other genes have been shown to have clinical significance. The presence of MMR genes andHOXB13is associated with a higher risk for developing prostate cancer and a higher risk for having more advanced disease at diagnosis.CHEK2is associated with a 9-times greater risk for hereditary or familial disease.ATM, a target for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, is associated with an accelerated development of metastases and shorter disease-specific survival.
Men with a germline mutation also have a greater risk for additional cancers. Kaul said the presence of aBRCA2mutation increases the risk for pancreatic cancer up to 36% compared with 0.5% in the general population.BRCA2increases the risk for melanoma up to 76% compared with 1.6% in the general population. Therefore, patients who are positive for genes associated with hereditary cancer risk require more rigorous surveillance.
“Screening for prostate cancer in this group of patients, especially if they [do not appear to have cancer], should have a higher index of suspicion,” Kaul said. “Screen these patients more carefully than the general population.”
However, some of these mutations can be targets for treatment. PD-1 inhibitors target the MMR genes, and PARP inhibitors are proven effective in patients with BRCA1. Androgen deprivation therapy has shown positive results for men with metastatic disease.
In 2017, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network added recommendations supporting family history and germline mutation testing to its prostate cancer guidelines. The guidelines were updated again this year to include testing for germline mutations in all patients with metastatic prostate cancer, as well as those with a Gleason score of 8 to 10, Gleason score of 4 + 3, and/or a PSA above 20. Patients with a strong family history of prostate cancer should be tested.
Kaul feels strongly that urologists should include testing for hereditary prostate cancer in regular clinical practice. The most important thing, he said, is capturing an accurate family history. He noted that 1 urology practice collected histories on 983 patients who visited the clinic over a 1-month period. The likelihood of a significant family history was 28%.
“These are just all-comers, not somebody specifically who comes to the office with a cancer,” he added. “Clearly, a significant family history is there, and you can get that in a significant proportion of your patients.