Ixazomib Approved for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma by FDA

November 20, 2015

A combination of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib (Ninlaro), lenalidomide (Revlimid) and dexamethasone has been approved by the FDA a full 4 months ahead of schedule for patients with multiple myeloma with at least 1 prior surgery.

Richard Pazdur, MD

A combination of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib (Ninlaro), lenalidomide (Revlimid) and dexamethasone has been approved by the FDA a full 4 months ahead of schedule for patients with multiple myeloma with at least 1 prior surgery.

The FDA's decision was based on data from the 722-patient phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 trial. The trial showcased a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 20.6 month with the combination, as opposed to a 14.7-month PFS with just lenalidomide and dexamethasone. In the study, patients were randomized to receive lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (n = 362) or with ixazomib (n = 360). Ixazomib was administered orally at 4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15. Lenalidomide was administered orally at 25 mg on days 1 to 21 and dexamethasone was administered orally at 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22.

The median age of patients participating in the study was 66 years. Of the patients enrolled, 88% were ISS stage I/II and 19% had high-risk cytogenetics by FISH. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received 1 prior therapy, with 77% having relapsed multiple myeloma. Prior therapies included bortezomib (69%), thalidomide (45%), and lenalidomide (12%).

“As we learn more about the underlying biology of multiple myeloma, we are encouraged to see the development of new ways to treat this disease,” Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a statement. “Today’s approval is the third drug for multiple myeloma approved this year and provides patients with a new oral treatment that slows disease progression when other therapy has failed.”

An independent data monitoring committee assessed the primary endpoint of PFS at a prespecified interim analysis in February 2015. Given the benefits seen with ixazomib, enrollment in the trial was stopped. Secondary endpoints of the study included objective response rate (ORR), safety, and overall survival, which was not yet mature at the time of the analysis.

At the interim analysis, the median follow-up in the ixazomib arm was 14.8 months. Overall, there was a 35% reduction in the risk of progression or death with ixazomib (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59—0.94; P = .012). For those with high-risk cytogenetics, the benefit with ixazomib was more pronounced, with a 46% improvement in PFS (HR, 0.54). Median PFS was similar in those with high-risk cytogenetics compared with the full population.

The ORR with ixazomib was 78.3% compared with 71.5% for lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (odds ratio [OR], 1.44; P = .035). The complete response rate with ixazomib was 11.7% versus 6.6% with the doublet (OR, 1.87; P = .019). The rate of very good partial response or better was 48.1% versus 39.0%, with and without ixazomib, respectively (OR, 1.45; P = .014).

The median time to response was shorter with ixazomib (1.1 vs 1.9 months). Additionally, the duration of response was nearly 5 months longer with the proteasome inhibitor (20.5 vs 15.0 months). At the time of the analysis, half of patients remained on treatment (55% vs 52%).

Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 68% of patients treated with ixazomib versus 61% for those who received lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone. Serious AEs occurred in 40% of patients treated with ixazomib compared with 44% without the proteasome inhibitor. AEs resulted in treatment discontinuation for 13% of patients in the ixazomib triplet arm versus 11% for the two agents alone.

The most frequently reported grade ≥3 hematologic AEs with ixazomib versus without were neutropenia (19% vs 16%, respectively), anemia (9% vs 13%), thrombocytopenia (13% vs 5%), and pneumonia (6% vs 8%). The most frequent all-grade gastrointestinal AEs for the triplet versus doublet were diarrhea (42% vs 36%) and vomiting (22% vs 11%).

All-grade peripheral neuropathy occurred in 28% of patients treated with ixazomib compared with 21% without. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was the same in each arm (2%). Skin rash events occurred in 35% of patients treated with ixazomib versus 21% in the doublet arm.

Fewer cases of renal failure were seen with ixazomib (4% vs 6%). Cardiac events were similar between the arms. Heart failure was seen in 4% of patients treated with ixazomib versus 3% without. Grade ≥3 cardiac failure was the same between each arm (2%).

In addition to ixazomib, the FDA has also given the go-ahead the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat (Farydak) and the CD38-directed antibody daratumumab (Darzalex) within the past year. Adding to the growing arsenal of new therapies for multiple myeloma, an application for elotuzumab (Empliciti) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone is currently before the FDA as well.

In addition to the MM1 study, the TOURMALINE clinical trial program contains four other phase III studies. In the MM2 trial, the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is being explored in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. The MM3 and MM4 studies are investigating maintenance therapy with ixazomib in patients who have or have not undergone an autologous stem cell transplant.

References

  1. Moreau P, Masszi T, Grzasko N, et al. Ixazomib, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor (PI), in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (IRd), Significantly Extends Progression-Free Survival (PFS) for Patients (Pts) with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): The Phase 3 Tourmaline-MM1 Study (NCT01564537). 2015 ASH Annual Meeting; Orlando, FL; December 5-8, 2015. Abstract 727.