The advent of renal cell carcinoma therapy really started almost 12 years ago when we took advantage of the fact that von-Hippel-Lindau syndrome is mutated in the majority of clear cell renal cell carcinomas, and targeting that VEGF pathway has been instrumental in advancing our therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Initially, we had sunitinib and pazopanib, axitinib. These are all different VEGF inhibitors. But we know that patients who receive sunitinib will ultimately progress through that therapy. And one of the things they noted was there are mutations in MET or AXL that sort of drive some of that resistance.
Cabozantinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI] that goes against VEGF, as well as MET and AXL. So clearly, given the METEOR trial, we know that in patients who are refractory to VEGF therapy, cabozantinib is certainly active. And so in those patients who, where you’re worried that if you don’t get a response, they’re not going to get to that second-line therapy, there’s a hope that by attacking MET and AXL earlier on, you may avoid some of those resistant clones and lead to a better response rate. And that was the basis for the CABOSUN trial, which showed superiority of cabozantinib over sunitinib in those patients with intermediate- and poor-risk disease.
I think toxicity management of any TKI is certainly going to be something that needs to be addressed closely. When we look at the CABOSUN data, the toxicity profile was relatively comparable between the 2 with actually less severe fatigue with cabozantinib than sunitinib and less marrow complications with cabozantinib. I think this is an important thing. If you look at the CABOSUN data, the starting dose was 60 mg, although close to 50% required dose reduction. So as we pursue this therapy, it’s very important to assess the patient on a regular basis and control their adverse effects, give the medication to control those adverse effects. But also if there is a need to pursue dose reduction, pursue dose reduction, pursue it down to 40 mg. And if the patient isn’t able to tolerate, maybe go to 20 mg or even further tweaks along those lines.
Transcript edited for clarity.
Case: A 70-Year-Old Man with Intermediate-Risk RCC
A 70-year-old Caucasian man presented to ER complaining of blood in his urine and abdominal pain.
H & P
Labs
Imaging
Treatment
Follow-up
Long-Term Data Prompt Shifting Approaches to Frontline RCC Therapy
October 8th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Chandler Park, MD, moderated a discussion on how recent trial data and sites of metastasis affect treatment of favorable-risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Enhancing Precision in Immunotherapy: CD8 PET-Avidity in RCC
March 1st 2024In this episode of Emerging Experts, Peter Zang, MD, highlights research on baseline CD8 lymph node avidity with 89-Zr-crefmirlimab for the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and response to immunotherapy.
Listen
GU Oncology Peers Explore Early Therapy Approaches in Low-Volume mRCC
September 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Chandler Park, MD, moderated a discussion on treating patients with indolent or low-volume favorable-risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Beyond the First-Line: Economides on Advancing Therapies in RCC
February 1st 2024In our 4th episode of Emerging Experts, Minas P. Economides, MD, unveils the challenges and opportunities for renal cell carcinoma treatment, focusing on the lack of therapies available in the second-line setting.
Listen