
Opinion|Videos|July 10, 2024
Discontinuation or Continuation of IO Therapy – IO/IO vs. IO/TKI Regimens
Author(s)Matthew T. Campbell, MD, MS, Rana R. McKay, MD
Dr. Campbell evaluates the efficacy and safety results from the 55-month analysis of the CheckMate-9ER trial, and explores the considerations for discontinuing or continuing immunotherapy (IO) in IO/IO versus IO/TKI combination regimens.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

- Dr Campbell: Please briefly review key efficacy and safety data from the CheckMate-9ER trial 55 month analysis (
Bourlon MT, et al. 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting. Abstract 362 ).
- What are the clinical implications of these data for treatment-naïve patients with advanced RCC?
- In responders, how important is the durability of the response (OS and PFS) for both the intermediate/poor and favorable-risk groups?
Advertisement
Related to this article

Experts debate second-line tivozanib for advanced renal cell carcinoma, weighing PFS gains, tolerability, and whether continuing immunotherapy adds real benefit.

Experts weigh IO-TKI vs dual immunotherapy for metastatic ccRCC, highlighting rapid symptom relief, bone/brain response, survival outcomes, and toxicity tradeoffs.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Targeted Oncology - Immunotherapy, Biomarkers, and Cancer Pathways
1
2026 AACR Report Highlights Advances and New Directions in Cancer Treatment
2
Amivantamab vs. Emerging EGFR Bispecifics in HNSCC
3
ESMO 2026 Preview: Late-Breaking Studies to Watch Across Tumor Types
4
Retlirafusp Alfa Improves Overall Survival in Phase 3 Trial of HER2– Gastric Cancer
5

