Opinion|Videos|July 31, 2024
New formulations for current therapies – SC vs. IV
Author(s)Matthew T. Campbell, MD, MS, Rana R. McKay, MD
The panelists examine the CheckMate-67T study, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
- CheckMate-67T compared subcutaneous vs intravenous nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic ccRCC. (
George et al. ASCO GU 2024; LBA360 .)
- How would the availability of a subcutaneous formulation option improve clinical practice efficiencies?
Advertisement
Related to this article
Experts debate second-line tivozanib for advanced renal cell carcinoma, weighing PFS gains, tolerability, and whether continuing immunotherapy adds real benefit.
Experts weigh IO-TKI vs dual immunotherapy for metastatic ccRCC, highlighting rapid symptom relief, bone/brain response, survival outcomes, and toxicity tradeoffs.
Daniel Heng, MD, discusses how belzutifan plus lenvatinib fills an unmet need after immunotherapy in RCC, with insights on managing hypoxia and anemia and on sequencing.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Targeted Oncology - Immunotherapy, Biomarkers, and Cancer Pathways
1
2026 AACR Report Highlights Advances and New Directions in Cancer Treatment
2
Amivantamab vs. Emerging EGFR Bispecifics in HNSCC
3
ESMO 2026 Preview: Late-Breaking Studies to Watch Across Tumor Types
4
Retlirafusp Alfa Improves Overall Survival in Phase 3 Trial of HER2– Gastric Cancer
5