During a live virtual event, Danielle Brander, MD, discussed with participating physicians second-line treatment options for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, with questions guided by Targeted Oncology.
Targeted Oncology™: How is venetoclax (Venclexta) used in CLL?
BRANDER: Venetoclax/rituximab [Rituxan] in the relapsed/refractory setting was compared 1:1 with BR [bendamustine/rituximab] [in the randomized MURANO trial (NCT02005471)]. Patients with del(17p) were allowed [and made up] about 25% of patients in each arm. The study was done at a time without the availability of targeted agents in this setting. The other difference from the use in the front line is the venetoclax/rituximab was given as a fixed-duration therapy for 2 years.1
The primary end point was progression-free survival [PFS], which at the 4-year follow-up was significantly different [HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.13-0.28; P < .0001]. This is notable because these are patients with relapsed/refractory CLL and del(17p) who stopped therapy at the end of 2 years. The difference at 2 years for the PFS rate [is 75.5% for venetoclax/rituximab and 68% for BR]. The difference in overall survival was also significant in this group [HR, 0.41; P < .0001]. That’s despite the fact some of those patients could get novel therapy after the BR. Like we saw with other agents, this held true across disease status, even in high-risk patients.
In addition, secondary end points looked at overall response rates and particularly the MRD [minimal residual disease] rates, which for relapsed/refractory patients are
going to be lower than in the front line. Still, very impressive for undetectable MRD at the level of 10-4.
They’ve now published some follow-up looking at MRD at the end of therapy and how that predicts progressive disease or becoming low-level MRD positive,2 [and whether that provides] a window to restart therapy before they have fully progressive disease.
Are you testing for MRD in your practice?
What are the safety concerns with venetoclax?
The treatment-emergent AEs are similar to those seen in the front line. You can still see high rates of neutropenia. Patients in studies of venetoclax were allowed to receive growth factor support, and if that can help patients to stay [on therapy], especially during the dose ramp-up, I do use growth factor support. Tumor lysis syndrome risk with the ramp-up dose was also relatively low here.
In your practice do you use venetoclax plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL for a fixed duration of 2 years?
Can you briefly discuss the use of PI3K inhibitors?
Idelalisib [Zydelig] and duvelisib [Copiktra] are both approved for relapsed/refractory CLL and SLL [small lymphocytic lymphoma] after 2 lines of therapy based on randomized studies.3,4 The comparator [arms in both trials] were antibody alone, with about a year and a half of follow-up data. The overall response rates are promising for PI3K inhibitors. What has often prohibited their use is that incorporation for many of us [involves] encountering AEs, many [of which are] thought to be immune mediated.
REFERENCES
1. Seymour JF, Kipps TJ, Eichorst BF, et al. Venetoclax plus rituximab is superior to bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/ refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia - results from pre-planned interim analysis of the randomized phase 3 MURANO study. Blood. 2017;130(suppl 1):LBA-2. doi:10.1182/blood.V130.Suppl_1.LBA-2.LBA-2
2. Kater AP, Seymour JF, Hillmen P, et al. Fixed duration of venetoclax-rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia eradicates minimal residual disease and prolongs survival: post-treatment follow-up of the MURANO phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(4):269-277. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.01580
3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration approves Gilead’s Zydelig (idelalisib) for relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular lymphoma and small lymphocytic lymphoma. News release. Gilead Sciences Inc. July 23, 2014. Accessed November 16, 2021. https://bit.ly/31q2Y7T
4. Duvelisib (Copiktra, Verastem, Inc.) for adult patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). FDA. September 24, 2018. Accessed November 16, 2021. https://bit.ly/3aWlJTy
Repotrectinib Elicits an Intracranial Response in ROS1+ Advanced NSCLC
March 25th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Christine, Bestvina, MD, discussed the intracranial responses to repotrectinib for patients with ROS1-psotive non–small cell lung cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
IKEMA Shows Advantage for Anti-CD38 in 1q21+ R/R Multiple Myeloma
March 22nd 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Cristiana Costa Chase, MD, discussed the IKEMA trial of isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the first article of a 2-part series
Read More
Fitting Loncastuximab Into the Current Landscape of R/R DLBCL
March 21st 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Emily Ayers, MD, discussed the current landscape for the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the need for better risk stratification data, and what led to the approval of loncastuximab tesirine in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Phase 2 and 3 Transplant-Eligible NDMM Data Build Evidence for Quadruplet Therapy
March 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Laahn Foster, MD, discussed the GRIFFIN, MASTER, and PERSEUS trials in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More