As the new co-Editor in Chief of Targeted Therapies in Oncology™ (TTO), I am excited and honored to be working alongside Dr Robert Ferris and the entire team at TTO. My clinical practice focuses on hematological malignancies, and what better issue for me to start on than one focusing on the 2021 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting. In recent years at the ASH conference, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has taken a back seat to other hematological malignancies.

This year at ASH was different. Two major developments have the potential to revolutionize the management of DLBCL in more than 2 decades. The first development was the POLARIX trial (NCT03274492). In the trial, patients with previously untreated DLBCL were randomly assigned to either R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy, or the anti-CD79b antibody-drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin (Polivy) plus R-CHP (pola-R-CHP). Pola-R-CHP improved progression-free survival and reduced the need for additional antilymphoma therapy; however, the complete response rate and overall survival were not affected. 

The second major development was the investigation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in the management of first relapse of DLBCL. Three studies compared CAR T-cell therapies with conventional high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients whose DLBCL had relapsed within 12 months of their initial therapy. In the ZUMA-7 trial (NCT03391466), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Yescarta) improved event-free survival (EFS) and response rates. In the TRANSFORM trial (NCT03575351), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel; Breyanzi) improved EFS, progression-free survival, and the complete response rate. Paradoxically, however, in the BELINDA trial (NCT03570892), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel; Kymriah) did not improve EFS or the response rate compared with standard therapy.

Taken together, these results have the potential to change the management of DLBCL. Whether the standard of frontline R-CHOP followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for first relapse will change in practice may depend on regulatory approvals of these products, reviews by panels of experts writing guidelines and pathways, the ability to manufacture products and deliver them to appropriate patients in a timely fashion, and the ability of society to pay for the costs of these novel agents.

Articles

Clinical Articles

Clinical trial findings presented during the ASH annual meeting have the potential to change the management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, according to John M. Burke, MD.

ADC, CAR T-Cell Therapy Push DLBCL Into Spotlight at ASH Conference

breast cancer who carry rare mutations identified by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) responded to matched targeted therapies, according to results of the plasmaMATCH trial (NCT03182634) presented during the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

mutations responded to neratinib (Nerlynx) and patients with 

The benefit of ctDNA is its ability to provide tumor genotyping information in a noninvasive, simple, and efficient method that can aid making a diagnosis and prognosis and guide treatment.

 Using ctDNA may provide a more current assessment of the genetic profile of advanced breast cancer compared with analysis of the primary tumor. Historically, ctDNA has been used in solid malignancies to detect actionable driver mutations, monitor treatment response, detect recurrence, identify resistance mechanisms, and prognosticate outcome.

, of The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, both in London, England, said during the presentation that the plasmaMATCH trial was designed to assess the clinical utility of using ctDNA testing to select patients for targeted therapies.

“Our team wanted to solve the issue of genotyping breast cancer tumors without having to perform multiple biopsies,” Turner said in a statement.3 Because mutations can change after treatment or when cancer metastasizes, it is important to develop methods to easily identify genetic mutations. Further, it is not always possible to take additional biopsies from patients with advanced disease.

Between December 2016 and April 2019, 1044 patients with metastatic or locally recurrent breast cancer were registered for the trial. Of 1033 patients screened, 142 entered into 4 parallel treatment cohorts with therapies matched to mutations that were identified through ctDNA testing.

The investigators reported that ctDNA testing was conducted prospectively using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in all patients. Guardant360 was used prospectively for error-corrected sequencing during recruitment. Sequencing from an advanced disease biopsy was conducted retrospectively and did not influence cohort entry, according to investigators.

At baseline, median age at registration was 56 years (range, 49-65) and 146 patients (14%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Thirty-six percent (n = 382) of patients had received ≥2 lines of chemotherapy; 8% (n = 89), a CDK4/6 inhibitor; 65% (n = 685), endocrine therapy; and 69% (n = 727), chemotherapy.

Mutation frequencies were reported using ddPCR as follows: 

mutation; all were hormone receptor (HR)– positive and 3 (4%) were HER2-positive. In cohort B, patients had the 

mutation, with 86% HR-positive and 14% HER2-positive. For cohort C, patients had the 

mutation with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer; all were HR positive and 1 (6%) was also HER2-positive. In cohort D, patients had the 

mutation in ER-negative breast cancer or the 

-inactivating mutation; 13 (68%) were HR-positive, and all patients were HER2- negative (

 Results for cohort E, which was designated for patients with no actionable mutations and triple-negative breast cancer, will be reported separately, Turner said.

Cohort A (n = 74) received fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and days 1 and 15 of cycle 2. Patients in cohort B (n = 20) received neratinib 240 mg orally on a continuous schedule starting day 1 of cycle 1, and patients with ER-positive breast cancer received fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and in cycle 2 onward after day 1. Patients in cohort C (n = 18) received capivasertib 400 mg orally twice a day on a 7-day schedule of 4 days on treatment followed by 3 days off and fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly during days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and in cycle 2 onward after day 1. Patients in cohort D (n = 19) received capivasertib 480 mg orally twice a day on a 7-day schedule of 4 days on treatment followed by 3 days off. In cohort E, patients received capivasertib 160 mg once daily on days 1 to 7 of each cycle and olaparib (Lynparza) 300 mg twice daily on a continuous schedule starting with cycle 1 on day 1.

The primary end point for cohorts A through D was confirmed objective response rate by RECIST 1.1. Secondary end points included clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety and frequency of mutations identified in ctDNA screening.

The investigators reported a high level of individual gene-level agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and sequencing results (95.5%-99.4%; κ = 0.89-0.93). When comparing the patients’ tumor samples with the findings from ctDNA testing, the investigators found that the ctDNA assay had an overall sensitivity of 93%.

The investigators noted that Guardant360 identified over 35% more 

mutations that can be targeted by therapies approved by the FDA. The assay also detected significantly more 

mutations and found previously undetected microsatellite instability and 

Predefined efficacy criteria were met in cohorts B (neratinib for 

mutations), with exploratory analysis of cohort D identifying activity of capivasertib in 

). Efficacy criteria were not met in cohort A (extended-dose fulvestrant for 

Specifically, patients in cohort A had an 8.1% response, which was below the threshold for inferred efficacy. In cohort B, patients with the 

mutation had a response rate of 25.0%, demonstrating inferred efficacy. In cohort C, 22.2% of patients demonstrated a response; in D, 10.5% had a response, which was below the efficacy threshold. In this cohort, an exploratory analysis of patients with an 

mutation had a response rate of 33.3% (2 of 6 patients), which did meet efficacy levels.

Adverse events were consistent with prior reports, with extended-dose fulvestrant well tolerated, according to the investigators. “This is a huge step in terms of making decisions in the clinic, particularly for those women with advanced breast cancer who could quickly be put on new targeted treatments matched to their cancer if [the disease] evolves to become drug resistant,” Turner said.

The investigators say the results suggest a robust way of identifying rare subtypes of breast cancer and could replace the more invasive methods of analyzing breast tumors.

“We have now confirmed that blood tests can quickly give us a bigger picture of the mutations that are present within multiple tumors throughout the study,” concluded Turner.

1. Turner N, Kingston B, Kilburn L, et al. Results from the plasmaMATCH trial: a multiple parallel cohort, multi-centre clinical trial of circulating tumour DNA testing to direct targeted therapies in patients with advanced breast cancer (CRUK/15/010). Presented at: 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Abstract GS3-06.

2. Han X, Wang J, Sun Y. Circulating tumor DNA as biomarkers for cancer detection. 

. 2017;15(2):59–72. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2016.12.004.

3. Blood Test Can Quickly Match Advanced Breast Cancer Patients to Targeted Treatments. The Institute of Cancer Research website. bit. ly/2NMn3Oy. Published December 12, 2019. Accessed January 10, 2020.

Patients with metastatic breast cancer who carry rare mutations identified by circulating
tumor DNA responded to matched targeted therapies, according to results of the plasma-MATCH trial presented during the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

ctDNA Informs Targeted Therapy Choice for Breast Cancer

Across therapy vehicles, agents targeting the B-cell maturation antigen have emerged as promising potential therapies in the multiple myeloma treatment paradigm. Following the 2019 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition, experts reflect on what these new advances mean for the field of oncology care.

“In the class of patients who are now known as triple-class refractory―refractory to an immuno-modulatory drug [IMiD], proteasome inhibitor [PI], and antibody―or ‘penta-refractory’―refractory to 2 IMiDs, 2 PIs, and daratumumab―we have essentially no good options except clinical trials,” 

, professor and chief of the Division of Hematology Oncology at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, said in an interview with 

Approximately 32,110 new cases of multiple myeloma were diagnosed in the United States in 2019, with about 50% of patients surviving at 5 years.

 Multiple myeloma is currently treated with mainly noncurative symptom management; thus, novel approaches are an area of active investigation.

During ASH, investigators for the randomized DREAMM-3 study described the phase III trial, which will compare belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) with pomalidomide (Pomalyst) and dexamethasone. The trial plans to enroll 320 participants, with a key primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary end points including overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), time toresponse, and the minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rate.

“The results from the pivotal DREAMM-2 clinical study served as the basis for the [submission of the biologics license application (BLA)] to the FDA for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who were refractory to an immunomodulatory drug and a proteasome inhibitor and were refractory and/or intolerant to an anti-CD38 antibody. Treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma remains challenging despite numerous therapeutic advances. Patients with disease refractory to immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti CD38 monoclonal antibodies have a poor prognosis, with [available] agents resulting in 26% of patients achieving an overall response, a median progres-sionfree survival of 3.7 months, and a median overall survival of 8.6 months,” Ira Gupta, MD, MBBS, vice pres-ident and medicine development leader–belantamab mafodotin at GlaxoSmithKline, said in an interview.

In the DREAMM-2 study, whose results were recently published in 

, investigators observed responses in 31% of patients treated with belantamab mafodotin 2.5 mg/kg and in 34% of patients treated at the 3.4-mg/kg dose.

 The positive study results led to the BLA submission in December 2019.

“Going forward, the value of belantamab mafodotin will likely be in combination with other existing therapeutic backbones, and earlier in the disease course, to exploit the potential for synergism, particularly as belantamab mafodotin is well tolerated and with a safety profile that is manageable and that does not overlap with [those] of other existing major therapeutic groups of drugs for multiple myeloma. However, this remains to be proven in clinical studies; a number of clinical studies combining belantamab mafodotin with other agents/backbone regimens are ongoing,” Hang Quach, MD, associate professor and director of Haematology Clinical Trials at St Vincent’s Hospital in East Melbourne, Australia, said in an interview.

, chief medical officer of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and professor and chair of the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia, said the changes “will have an impact once the drug is approved. Similar to daratumumab [Darzalex], which was initially only approved in refractory multiple myeloma, there are currently trials ongoing that combine belamaf [belantamab mafodotin] with other active multiple myeloma agents such as lenalidomide [Revlimid], bortezomib [Velcade], and pomalidomide to bring this treatment to earlier lines of therapy to maximize the potential benefit for patients.”

CARTITUDE-1 is an ongoing phase Ib/II trial examining the safety and efficacy of JNJ-68284528 (JNJ-4528), which leads to preferential expansion of CD8-positive (+) memory cells that target myeloma cells, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The phase Ib results of this study were presented during the ASH meeting.

 JNJ-4528 is a structurally differentiated chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) with 2 single-domain antibod-ies directed at BCMA as well as a 4-1BB costimulatory domain.

 In the trial, the median administered dose was 0.73 × 10

"JNJ-4528 was used in relapsed/refractory patients who had failed a median of 5 (and up to 18) prior lines of chemotherapy. It showed a 100% response rate with 69% complete remission or better rates," according to lead study author 

, assistant professor of medicine (hematology and medical oncology) at The Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, New York.

CARTITUDE-1 enrolled 29 patients. All the patients evaluable for MRD response were MRD negative, and 27 patients remained progression free at the median follow-up of 6 months. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 27 (93%) patients but was mostly grade 1 or 2. Only 1 dose-limiting toxicity of grade 4 CRS occurred. Neurotoxicity was rare.

“We find this study promising,” Madduri said. “We look forward to more long-term follow-up data, and a second portion of this study has fully accrued.” The dose for the phase II portion of the trial will be 0.75 × 10

 In addition, the phase III CARTITUDE-4 trial (NCT04181827) has been initiated and is comparing JNJ-4528 against 2 regimens comprising pomalidomide and dexamethasone plus either daratumumab or bortezomib (

LCAR-B38M, an identical CAR to JNJ-4528, was examined in China in the phase I LEGEND-2 trial, whose results were also discussed at the meeting.7 Earlier results presented in 2018 had demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in 57 enrolled patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Patients received a median dose of 0.5 × 10

 of LCAR-B38M as 3 separate infusions. The results demonstrated an ORR of 88%, with 74% of patients having a complete response (CR).

The median PFS was 28.2 months for patients who attained CR versus 3.2 months in those without CR.

 MRD-negative CR was achieved in 68% of patients, and the median OS had not yet been reached at 25 months in the subset of patients with CR. Rates of very good partial response (VGPR) and partial response (PR) were 4% and 11%, respectively.

 copies/μg genomic DNA) were observed in most patients with available blood samples for analysis, and 5 patients showed CAR persistence at 10 months.

Adverse events (AEs) of pyrexia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia were among the most common toxicities. Ninety percent of the patients in the study experienced CRS, with a median onset of 9 days; 46% of patients with CRS received tocilizumab (Actemra). One patient experienced neurotoxicity, with manifestations including aphasia.

The results of the LEGEND-2 study led to the PRIME (PRIority MEdicines) designation of LCAR-B38M (JNJ-4528) by the European Medicines Agency.

 This decision, announced in a press release in April 2019, will facilitate production of the drug. According to the presentation at ASH, investigators have initiated the phase II CARTIFAN-1 confirmatory trial (NCT03758417) in China.

The ongoing phase I CRB-402 study examining the next-generation anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb21217—which uses the lentiviral CAR T design of idecabtagene vicleucel (bb2121) combined with the PI3K inhibitor bb007 during ex vivo culture to create a more persistent and potent CAR product—showed promise in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma.

 The trial followed an initial dose-escalation design, with patients treated with 150 × 10

“Overall, early and deep responses were observed in some patients,” Nina Shah, MD, associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, and an investigator on the trial, said in an interview.

As of 2019, 83% of the patients were reported to have an objective response, with most patients also achieving MRD-negative status. The rate of CR or stringent complete remission (sCR) was 33%, and the VGPR rate was 50%.

Twenty-five patients experienced CRS, and most were treated with tocilizumab; a few patients needed corticosteroids. At the highest dose, 1 person died from a CRS event and neurotoxicity. Nine patients experienced neurotoxicity, with 2 having a grade 3 event and 1 having a grade 4 event.

A trial conducted in China introduced BM38, a new bispecific CAR T-cell therapy featuring tandem anti-BCMA and anti-CD38 single-chain variable fragments, as well as 4-1BB and CD3ζ signaling domains. The study produced an ORR of 90.1% in 22 patients and a rate of bone marrow MRD-negative status of 81.8%. Twelve patients achieved sCR, 2 had VGPR, 5 had PR, and 1 had a minor response. The PFS rate at 9 months was 78.9%, and the median PFS was not reached.

Over 90% of study participants experienced CRS, with 22.7% of patients experiencing grade ≥3 CRS. No cases of neurotoxicity were observed. The incidence of hepatic AEs was 13.6%, and 1 patient experienced nephrotoxicity. Hematologic AEs were present in nearly every patient. Given the promising data, more studies of BM38 CAR T cells are expected. Investigators will follow the participants in this particular study for 2 years.

In another ongoing study conducted in the United States, 10 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma received anti-BCMA CAR T cells, either alone or in combination with anti CD19 CAR T cells, following lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Early results showed an acceptable safety profile and high response rates. The administered dose for both products, 5 × 10

 CAR+ cells, was divided into 3 doses (10%, 30%, and 60%). The rationale for the CAR T-cell combination stems from the potential for relapse mediated by BCMA-negative/ CD19+ myeloma cells remaining after anti-BCMA CAR therapy alone.

The PRIME trial, which is evaluating the P-BCMA-101 CAR T-cell product, is currently enrolling participants for the phase II portion. Phase I of the trial previously demonstrated efficacy and safety for P-BCMA-101 in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. According to investigators, the piggyBac DNA Modification System used to produce these CAR T cells is associated with several advantages compared with the viral vector–based systems normally used.

Findings from a meta-analysis of patients treated with BCMA CAR T-cell therapies that was conducted at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany were presented by Nico Gagelmann and his colleagues.

 The analysis consisted of 15 prospective studies involving 285 patients with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma who were treated with CAR T-cell therapies targeting BCMA. The analyzed patients had received an average of 7 prior lines of therapy. The results showed an ORR of 82% (95% CI, 74%-88%) and a CR rate of 36% (95% CI, 24%-50%). The percentage of responsive patients with MRD-negative status was 77% (95% CI, 67%-85%), and the median PFS was 10 months.

Most studies involved the use of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for lymphodepletion prior to CAR T-cell administration. Fifteen percent of patients experienced grade 3/4 CRS (95% CI, 10%-23%), and 18% had neurotoxicity (95% CI, 10%-31%). Forty-five percent of responsive patients relapsed (95% CI, 27%-64%), and the authors rec-ommended larger studies with longer follow-up to evaluate the association between response and survival.

In a phase I study examining CC-93269, a bispecific antibody that bivalently binds BCMA on plasma cells and CD3 on T cells, each of the 30 patients enrolled had been treated with at least 3 other therapies.

 Doses of >6 mg to 10 mg resulted in an ORR of 88.9%, and the 10-mg dose led to an sCR of 44.4%.15 CRS affected 89.5% of the patients enrolled, with 57.9% experiencing grade 1 and 26.3% experiencing grade 2 CRS.

 One treatment-related death occurred; the patient had CRS, with a potential infection considered a contributing factor.

 Grade ≥3 AEs included neutropenia, anemia, infections, and thrombocytopenia.

"The ability to target BCMA in multiple myeloma is one of the most attractive targets we have currently,” concluded Lonial. Referring specifically to belantamab mafodotin, he said “the ability to have something on the shelf to target BCMA is exciting, as patients with refractory multiple myeloma have few options, and those they do have are associated with significant AEs and short duration of response.”

1. Cancer stat facts: myeloma. National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program website. https://bit.ly/2RfmuPy. Accessed January 8, 2020. 

2. Weisel K, Hopkins TG, Fecteau D, et al. DREAMM-3: a phase 3, open-label, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) monotherapy compared with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexameth-asone (pom/dex) in participants with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). 

. 2019;134(suppl 1; abstr 1900). doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-129893. 

3. Lonial S, Lee HC, Badros A, et al. Belantamab mafodotin for relapsed or refrac-tory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-2): a two-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 2 study [published online December 16, 2019]. 

 4. Pivotal DREAMM-2 study demonstrated a clinically meaningful overall response rate with belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma [news release]. London, United Kingdom: GlaxoSmithKline; December 16, 2019. bit.ly/2TeHXt0. Accessed January 9, 2020. 

5. Madduri D, Usmani SZ, Jagannath S, et al. Results from CARTITUDE-1: a phase 1b/2 study of JNJ-4528, a CAR-T cell therapy directed against B-cell maturation anti-gen (BCMA), in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). 

. 2019;134(suppl 1; abstr 577). doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-121731. 

6. Zhao W-H, Liu J, Wang B-Y, et al. Updated analysis of a phase 1, open-label study of LCAR-B38M, a chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy directed against B-cell maturation antigen, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. 

. 2018;132(suppl 1; abstr 955). doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-110548. 

7. Wang B-Y, Zhao W-H, Liu J, et al. Long-term follow-up of a phase 1, first-in-human open-label study of LCAR-B38M, a structurally differentiated chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). 

. 2018;134(suppl 1; abstr 579). doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-124953. 

8. European Medicines Agency grants Janssen PRIME designation for JNJ-68284528 (LCAR-B38M), an investigational BCMA CAR-T therapy discovered by Legend Biotech [news release]. Piscataway, NJ: Legend Biotech; April 3, 2019. bit.ly/39XhgiO. Accessed January 9, 2019. 

9. Berdeja J, Alsina M, Shah N, et al. Updated results from an ongoing phase 1 clin-ical study of bb21217 anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy. 

. 2019;134(suppl 1;abstr 927). doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-126660. 

10. Chenggong L, Heng M, Yu H, et al. A bispecific CAR-T cell therapy targeting BCMA and CD38 for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: updated results from a phase 1 dose-climbing trial. 

. 2019;134(suppl 1; abstr 930). doi: 10.1182/ blood-2019-130340. 

11. Garfall AL, Cohen AD, Lacey SF, et al. Combination anti-BCMA and anti-CD19 CAR T cells as consolidation of response to prior therapy in multiple myeloma. 

. 2019;134(suppl 1; abstr 1863). doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-131515. 

12. Costello CL, Gregory TK, Ali SA, et al. Phase 2 study of the response and safety of P-BCMA-101 CAR-T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma (MM) (PRIME). 

. 2019;134(suppl 1; abstr 3184). doi: 10.1182/ blood-2019-129562. 

13. Gagelmann N, Ayuk FA, Atanackovic D, Kroeger N. B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. 

. 2019;134(suppl 1; abstr 3113). doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-121967. 

14. Costa LJ, Wong SW, Bermúdez A, et al. First clinical study of the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) 2+1 T cell engager (TCE) CC-93269 in patients (Pts) with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): interim results of a phase 1 multicenter trial. 

. 2019;134(suppl 1; abstr 143). doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-122895. 

15. Early-phase trial suggests CC-93269 has activity in relapsed/refractory multi-ple myeloma. 

website. bit.ly/2t0r3nr. Updated January 15, 2019. Accessed January 16, 2019.

February 1 2020 | Targeted Therapies in Oncology

ADC, CAR T-Cell Therapy Push DLBCL Into Spotlight at ASH Conference

ctDNA Informs Targeted Therapy Choice for Breast Cancer

BCMA-Targeting Agents for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Take Hold