
Acalabrutinib, Rituximab, and Brexu-cel Yields High Response Rates High-Risk MCL
Key Takeaways
- The treatment regimen achieved a 100% overall response rate, with 95% of patients reaching complete response after brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion.
- Safety concerns included cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity, with 40% of patients requiring intensive care.
A novel treatment regimen for high-risk mantle cell lymphoma shows impressive response rates and minimal residual disease in early trial results.
Data from the phase 1 Window-3 trial (NCT05495464) indicate that treating patients with previously untreated, high-risk mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) using a specific combination regimen yielded promising results.1
The treatment sequence—starting with the combination of acalabrutinib (Calquence) and rituximab (Rituxan), followed by brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel; Tecartus)—led to high rates of response and the presence of undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) in these patients.
Findings presented during the
Regarding safety, 1 patient experienced a grade 3 adverse effect (AE) during treatment with acalabrutinib plus rituximab (skin rash); no grade 4 or higher AEs were reported. Following treatment with brexu-cel, all patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS), including 5% of patients with grade 3 CRS and 10% of patients with grade 4 CRS. The median time to CRS onset was 3 days (range, 0-7). Any-grade immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was reported in 75% of patients, including grade 3 ICANS in 30% of patients and grade 4 ICANS in 15% of patients. The median time to ICANS onset was 6 days (range, 2-15); all ICANS resolved at a median time of 3 days (range, 1-37). Forty percent of patients required intensive care due to CRS or ICANS, lasting for a median duration of 3 days (range, 2-25).
Additionally, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 60% of patients, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was reported in 20% of patients, and grade 3/4 infections were experienced by 20% of patients. No grade 5 AEs were reported during the study.
“The study’s limited sample size and absence of a control arm constrain definitive attribution of acalabrutinib’s effects on CAR [T-cell] fitness and toxicity,” lead study author Preetesh Jain, MBBS, MD, DM, PhD, said during the presentation. “However, extended follow-up…[with] comprehensive translational analyses are currently underway to assess response durability and the impact of acalabrutinib maintenance on [long-term] safety and efficacy.”
Jain is an assistant professor in the Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma of the Division of Cancer Medicine at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
What was the rationale for exploring a frontline treatment approach with acalabrutinib, rituximab, and brexu-cel in high-risk MCL?
Jain highlighted that preclinical studies have shown synergy between BTK inhibition and anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, allowing for improved CAR T-cell expansion, effector functions, and engraftment. This approach has also shown reductions in immunosuppressive cell populations such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory B cells, and regulatory T cells.
Window-3 was a single-center study conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center that enrolled patients at least 18 years of age with high-risk MCL.2 Patients needed to be eligible to receive acalabrutinib, rituximab, and CAR T-cell therapy; have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1; and be cleared by cardiology to receive acalabrutinib and CAR T-cell therapy. No prior treatment for MCL was permitted, and patients who were primary refractory to acalabrutinib/rituximab were not allowed to participate.
Enrolled patients began treatment with acalabrutinib at 100 mg twice per day plus rituximab at 375 mg/m2 once per month for the first cycle, and treatment with the combination continued until patients achieved a PR or stable disease, or for up to 9 cycles.1 Any patients with a CR or progressive disease after acalabrutinib/rituximab would not receive CAR T-cell therapy.
Within 1 week of achieving PR or SD, patients underwent leukapheresis for brexu-cel manufacturing. Patients then underwent lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide on days –5 to –3 prior to infusion of brexu-cel on day 0. Thirty days following brexu-cel infusion, patients could receive acalabrutinib maintenance for 24 months, and the study also included a cohort with no maintenance.
Safety served as the trial’s primary end point. Secondary end points included ORR, CR rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). MRD assessments were an exploratory end point.
The 20 enrolled patients had a median age of 62 years (range, 44-73), and 85% of patients were male. Most patients had bone marrow involvement (95%), gastrointestinal involvement (95%), a serum lactate dehydrogenase above the upper limit of normal (55%), TP53 aberrations (50%), and SOX-11 –positive disease (90%). Per MCL International Prognostic Index classification, 5% of patients had low-risk MCL, 30% had intermediate-risk disease, and 65% had high-risk MCL. Additionally, 25% of patients had a Ki-67 expression below 30%, and 60% of patients had an expression below 50%.
What additional efficacy data were reported in Window-3?
Findings also demonstrated that both the median PFS and OS were not reached at the data cutoff. At 2 years, with a median follow-up of 17 months, the PFS rate was 89% and the OS rate was 100%. Two patients experienced progressive disease at 6 and 12 months, respectively.
At a 10-6 sensitivity, undetectable MRD rates were 25% at day 0, 84% at day 15, 89% at day 30, 95% at 3 months and 6 months, 94% at 9 months, and 100% at 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 21 months, and 24 months.







































