scout
|Videos|April 30, 2021

Comparing Tandem Stem Cell Transplant Approaches in Multiple Myeloma

Nicolaus Kröger, MD, discusses the advantages of autologous stem cell transplant and allogeneic stem cell transplant compared with autologous tandem transplant in patients with multiple myeloma.

Nicolaus Kröger, MD, a professor and medical director of the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, discusses the advantages of autologous stem cell transplant and allogeneic stem cell transplant (auto-allo) compared with autologous tandem transplant (auto-auto) in patients with multiple myeloma.

Kröger says the major advantage of using the auto-allo approach in the prospective, phase 2 study (NCT00777998) was that patients had a lower risk of relapse. The incidence of relapse for the auto-allo group was significantly lower than the auto-auto group. Both arms were given thalidomide (Thalomid) maintenance therapy after tandem transplant.

The benefit with auto-allo was partly overshadowed by a higher non-relapse mortality with auto-allo, at 13%, versus auto-auto, at 2%. This was a significant difference. There was still a risk of non-relapse mortality in patients receiving auto-allo, which is why this type of treatment has not become the standard of care in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to Kröger.

Patients with high-risk disease, such as those with deletion 17p, for example, might benefit from the auto-allo treatment approach, Kröger says. In this trial, about 10% of patients had high-risk disease, and although there was a trend towards improved survival with auto-allo, the number of patients was not large enough for this benefit to be significant.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on practice-changing data in community practice.


Latest CME