Treatment with niraparib elicited durable conditional progression-free survival rates vs placebo in patients with ovarian cancer whose tumors were homologous recombination deficient.
In patients with ovarian cancer whose tumors were homologous recombination deficient (HRD), treatment with niraparib (Zejula) led to durable conditional progression-free survival (cPFS) rates compared with placebo up to 4 years post randomization, according to results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study (NCT02655016). Findings were presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology Gynaecological Cancers Congress 2023.1
Investigators reported on the cPFS, which represents the probability that patients remain free of progression and death at a predefined time after reaching a predefined landmark standpoint.
“In the subset of patients who survived either 1 or 2 years post randomization in the PRIMA study, we evaluated the probability of being alive and progression free for an additional 2 years,” Antonio González-Martín, MD, PhD, director of the Department of Medical Oncology at Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain, said during a presentation of the data.
In the HRD population, cPFS at 2 years was 51% in the niraparib arm vs 29% in the placebo arm. The 1-year landmark cPFS was 62% vs 50%, respectively, and the 2-year landmark cPFS was 74% vs 60%.
The standard PFS rate at 3 years was 44% in the niraparib arm and 23% in the placebo arm in the HRD population. At 4 years, the rate for PFS was 38% for niraparib and 17% for placebo. Estimates for 2-year cPFS rates were higher at each additional year of PFS.
In the overall population, cPFS from the 1-year landmark was 54% in the niraparib arm vs 46% in the placebo arm and the 2-year landmark was 67% in the niraparib arm vs 64% in the placebo arm. Standard PFS rate at 3 years was 29% vs 18%, respectively, and at 4 years the standard PFS rate was 24% vs 14%, respectively. “Again, the estimates for 2-year cPFS rates were higher at each additional year of PFS,” González-Martín said.
The phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT OV26/GOG 3012 study evaluated niraparib as frontline maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer after a response to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy. Study participants were at high risk for disease progression: Thirty-five percent had stage IV disease, 99.6% of patients with stage III disease had residual disease post primary debulking surgery, 67% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and only 31% achieved a partial response to first-line chemotherapy.
In the primary analysis of the study,2 investigators reported that niraparib significantly extended PFS compared with placebo in patients with HRD tumors (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.31-0.59; P < .001). In the overall population, researchers noted a 38% chance of death (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.76; P < .001).
Updated long-term PFS and safety evaluation at data cutoff of November 2021 suggested that patients treated with niraparib were more likely to be free of progression and death at 4 years than those who received placebo in both the HRD population (38% in the niraparib arm vs 17% in the placebo arm) and overall population (24% vs 14%, respectively).3 In this update, adverse events were manageable and consistent with the primary analysis.
“Conditional PFS is a clinically relevant measure that may be useful for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, characterized by high rates of progression in the first 2 years post diagnosis,” González-Martín said.
The findings suggest that patients who are free from death and progression at the 1- and 2-year landmarks had a high probability of being alive and progression-free 2 years later. “This illustrates the long-term effect of niraparib and supports its use as a first-line maintenance therapy,” GonzálezMartín concluded.
Advances in Subsequent Therapies Shake Up Sequencing of ccRCC Treatment
April 25th 2024With the approval of belzutifan and other newer data for treating patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma, the state of subsequent therapies is advancing beyond the reuse of frontline options with impacts on duration of response and quality of life.
Read More
Novel Approaches Focus on Limiting Toxicity in Older Patients With ALL
April 22nd 2024The major challenges for clinicians treating older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia surround the emergence of resistance to existing therapies and the toxicities associated with current chemotherapies.
Read More
Ornstein Advises on Starting Dose and Management of Lenvatinib in RCC
April 21st 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Moshe Ornstein, MD, MA, provided guidance on dosing and toxicity concerns in a patient treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Read More