Ronald L. Paquette, MD, discusses how transplant related morbidity and mortality risks differ between age groups for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.
Ronald L. Paquette, MD, clinical director, Stem Cell and Bone Marrow Transplant Program at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, discusses the transplant related morbidity and mortality risks and how they differ between the age groups for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
According to Paquette, patients with MDS are generally older. His research has shown transplant related mortality for older individuals to be consistent with previous data when using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen.
Fludarabine with total body radiation at a dose of 800 cGy is the current preferred regimen used to treat these patients, but the safety and efficacy are continuously being examined to make sure this method is best.
Transcription:
0:08 | Myelodysplastic syndrome patients in general are older. I'm gearing my discussion primarily to the older age group MDS, and of course MDS can happen in younger patients to where there are less concerns about conditioning related morbidity and mortality. What we found is that our transplant related mortality for older individuals is still less than 10% using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen. I think that's reassuring.
0:44 | What we found however, is that because we're using post-transplant cyclophosphamide as graft versus host disease prophylaxis, the use of alkylating agents as part of the conditioning regimen has led to undue toxicities not just in older age group, but even in younger patients. In our hands, Northland and the conditioning regimen is associated with thrombotic microangiopathy in some patients at a rate that's higher than the use of total body irradiation. We also see pulmonary toxicity with the use of alkylating agents in the conditioning regimen.
1:25 | Our go to regimen in older individuals is fludarabine with total body radiation at a dose of 800 cGy. That's been our preference recently. We are obviously monitoring the safety and efficacy of this regimen going forward. But we've been able to mitigate the risks of those two particular complications that we previously saw with melphalan containing regimens.
Pacritinib, Sirolimus, and Tacrolimus Combo Fails to Improve GVHD Outcomes
August 10th 2024A phase 2 study found that a combination of pacritinib, sirolimus, and tacrolimus successfully suppressed pSTAT3 and Th1/Th17 cells, but failed to prevent acute graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic transplant.
Read More
Buprenorphine as an Alternative for Pain Management in Bone Marrow Transplants
August 1st 2024Mayuko Sakae, MD, discussed research on pain management for patients undergoing bone marrow transplants, highlighting the potential buprenorphine shows in offering a valuable alternative to traditional opioids.
Read More
BLA for Remestemcel-L to Treat Pediatric SR-aGVHD Resubmitted to FDA
July 10th 2024The application of remestemcel-L, a potential first-of-its-kind treatment for pediatric patients following stem cell transplants, has been resubmitted for FDA approval after addressing previous concerns.
Read More
Pacritinib, Sirolimus, and Tacrolimus Combo Fails to Improve GVHD Outcomes
August 10th 2024A phase 2 study found that a combination of pacritinib, sirolimus, and tacrolimus successfully suppressed pSTAT3 and Th1/Th17 cells, but failed to prevent acute graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic transplant.
Read More
Buprenorphine as an Alternative for Pain Management in Bone Marrow Transplants
August 1st 2024Mayuko Sakae, MD, discussed research on pain management for patients undergoing bone marrow transplants, highlighting the potential buprenorphine shows in offering a valuable alternative to traditional opioids.
Read More
BLA for Remestemcel-L to Treat Pediatric SR-aGVHD Resubmitted to FDA
July 10th 2024The application of remestemcel-L, a potential first-of-its-kind treatment for pediatric patients following stem cell transplants, has been resubmitted for FDA approval after addressing previous concerns.
Read More
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512