
Opinion|Videos|February 20, 2025
Second-Line Therapy Options
Author(s)Sumanta Kumar Pal, MD
A panelist discusses how second-line treatment options for kidney cancer have evolved through multiple clinical trials including Study 205, METEOR, CONTACT-03, TIVO-3, TiNivo-2, and LITESPARK-005, which have demonstrated varying efficacy across different patient populations and prior therapies, particularly noting the impact of prior immunotherapy exposure on treatment selection and the need for careful consideration of historical trial data in the context of modern treatment paradigms.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- What are the second-line options for this patient per the NCCN guidelines for kidney cancer?
- Please provide a brief overview of the efficacy and safety data supporting these options, as appropriate (eg, phase 2 Study 205, METEOR, control arm of CONTACT-03, TIVO-3, control arm of TiNivo-2, LITESPARK-005)
- How do the populations of these trials compare? Distinctions in approved indications (eg, line of therapy; prior ICI).
- What are the trends that have emerged with long-term follow up?
- What guidance can you offer community oncologists when critically weighing the evidence from studies of the second-line options?
- What are the limitations of applying data from older studies in modern practice (eg, prior ICI)?
Advertisement
Related to this article

Breakthrough targeted therapies—from KRAS and PROTACs to CAR T—plus ctDNA monitoring and personalized vaccines push earlier detection and smarter cancer treatment.

J. Thaddeus Beck, MD, discusses how the shift from intravenous to subcutaneous formulations is changing oncology practice, from clinic logistics to patient preferences.

Experts debate second-line tivozanib for advanced renal cell carcinoma, weighing PFS gains, tolerability, and whether continuing immunotherapy adds real benefit.

The designation expands the investigational immunotherapy’s development across tumor types for patients whose disease progresses after prior treatment, including immune checkpoint inhibition.

Phase 2b data show iopofosine I-131 drives deep, durable responses in relapsed Waldenström macroglobulinemia after BTK inhibitors, with manageable cytopenias.

The RELIGHT study found that adding retlirafusp alfa to chemotherapy extended overall and progression-free survival in previously untreated gastric and GEJ cancers.

Gary Simmons, DO, MSHA, discusses outpatient CAR T-cell therapy in the community, the operational and payer bottlenecks his practice has faced, and advice for colleagues.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Targeted Oncology - Immunotherapy, Biomarkers, and Cancer Pathways
1
2026 AACR Report Highlights Advances and New Directions in Cancer Treatment
2
ESMO 2026 Preview: Late-Breaking Studies to Watch Across Tumor Types
3
Retlirafusp Alfa Improves Overall Survival in Phase 3 Trial of HER2– Gastric Cancer
4
Dr Beck on the Practical Realities of Subcutaneous Oncology Drug Delivery
5

