Sagar Lonial, MD, FACP:One of the interesting things about having a target that’s so important in myeloma, such as BCMA [B-cell maturation antigen], is that we already have a large number of different ways to attack BCMA. One of them is the antibody drug conjugate, which is basically a monoclonal antibody. Instead of relying purely on immune mechanisms to kill the cell, there is a key piece of chemotherapy on the back that took to it that is then directly targeted to the myeloma cell. This is positive in many ways because it’s relatively easy and straightforward and doesn’t necessarily require an intact immune system to really be affective.
The next category is a bispecific, or BiTE [bispecific T-cell engager]. The plan here is similar to another antibody that’s used, or a bispecific that’s used in ALL [acute lymphoblastic leukemia] called blinatumomab. It’s basically a portion of the Fc receptor that targets CD3, connected with the FC target that targets BCMA. These 2 pieces are connected together in the middle.
What the bispecific antibody does is bring a T-cell right next to a myeloma cell, allowing the T-cell to subsequently kill that myeloma cell because of close proximity and antigen activation. That certainly again is exciting, but does require some level of T-cell activation present in order for this to really be affective.
The third mechanism is a CAR [chimeric antigen receptor] T cell, where you take out T-cells from the patient, autologous T-cells, transfect them in a way that they express something that targets BCMA directly, and then give those T-cells back to the patient. That is probably very exciting as well. When you use the CAR-T cell versus bispecific, versus antibody drug conjugate, right now is really unclear. Each of them has pros and cons. The first 2 that I mentionedthe bispecific and the antibody drug conjugate—are off the shelf. You can give them whenever you feel you need to. Whereas the CAR-T cell has to be made outside the body and then infused back.
The last 2, the bispecific and the CAR cell, are associated with cytokine releasesyndrome, or CRS, which requires some level of close monitoring and medical intervention should thisadverse effect potentially emerge. Each of them has pros and cons depending upon what’s best for the patient at any given time.
Transcript edited for clarity.
Understanding Risks and Training Needs for Outpatient Bispecific Usage
December 5th 2023During a Targeted Oncology™ Case-Based Roundtable™ event, Robert Mancini, PharmD, BCOP, FHOPA, discussed the various approved bispecific T-cell engagers and gave guidance for healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers related to adverse event management. This is the second of 2 articles based on this event.
Read More
Hashmi Reviews Teclistamab Data for a Patient With R/R Multiple Myeloma
November 30th 2023During a Targeted Oncology™ Clinical Case Forum event in partnership with the South Carolina Oncology Society, Hamza Hashmi, MD, discusses the significance of the MajesTEC-1 of the bispecific T-cell engager teclistamab for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Read More
Talquetamab Shows High Response Rates in BCMA-Pretreated RRMM
November 29th 2023During a Targeted Oncology™ Case-Based Roundtable™ event, Jonathan L. Kaufman, MD, discussed results of the MonumenTAL-1 trial of talquetamab in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. This is the first of 2 articles based on this event.
Read More
Connecting Heart Disease and Hematologic Malignancies
November 28th 2023A real-world analysis found that patients with acute coronary syndrome who were also diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy had worse survival outcomes, and patients with multiple myeloma were overrepresented in the population.
Read More