Conventional Imaging Versus PSMA PET/CT Scanning in Prostate Cancer

Video

A. Oliver Sartor, MD, discusses a discrepancy found between conventional imaging and PSMA PET/CT scanning for prostate cancer. 

A. Oliver Sartor, MD, professor of medicine, medical director, Tulane Cancer Center, C. E. and Bernadine Laborde Professor of Cancer Research, discusses a discrepancy found between conventional imaging and PSMA PET/CT scanning for prostate cancer. 

Following FDA approvals for apalutamide (Erleada), enzalutamide (Xtandi), and darolutamide (Nubeqa), further investigation was done to understand what percentage of these patients who received these agents may have PSMA PET/CT scan positivity, says Sartor. 

Utilizing patient characteristics from a trial of enzalutamide, this analysis showed that 98% of patients were PET positive, explains Sartor. Moreover, 55% of patients were classified as having metastatic disease, despite being deemed nonmetastatic by conventional imaging. 

These findings do not change the metastasis-free survival benefit demonstrated with apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide, says Sartor. The drugs were investigated using conventional imaging and showed a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months.

Related Videos
Video 5 - "Addressing Unmet Needs and Final Perspectives on nmCRPC"
Video 4 - "Integrating ARAMIS Trial Data and Managing Adverse Events in nmCRPC Treatment"
Video 3 - "Optimizing Treatment, Biomarkers, and Chemotherapy for Patients with nmCRPC"
Video 2 - "Addressing Risks and Challenges in the Standard of Care for Patients with nmCRPC"
Video 1 - "Overview of a 75-Year-old Patient with Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer’s Case"
Related Content