What considerations underlie these choices?
The idea here is that you want to do something that clearly has a proven benefit, number one, and that there are clinical trial data that support it. Number two, you want to do something that allows somebody to maintain a quality of life for as long as possible and is really less cumbersome to the patient.
ER+/HER2-Breast Cancer: Case 1
Angela is a 56-year-old woman, who in 2013 was diagnosed with a 4 cm IDC of the left breast, ER positive at 50%, PR negative, and Her2 negative. She was treated with four cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, followed by twelve weeks of paclitaxel.
She then had a left MRM with AD, showing a residual 1.5 cm tumor with 3/10 LN positive
She received anastrozole, and in early 2015 she complained of low back pain and a bone scan revealed multiple areas of uptake in the lumbosacral spine
PET-CT revealed lytic lesions in the lumbosacral spine and pelvis, and a 2 cm low attenuation lesion in the liver with a PET SUV value of 10, indicating malignancy
She was placed on denosumab 120 mg SQ monthly, and fulvestrant 500 mg IM monthly. Her pain resolved within 2 months, and on follow-up CT qt 4 months her bone lesions appeared sclerotic and her liver lesion had reduced to 1 cm. Her fulvestrant and denosumab were continued.
In early 2016 she again complained of worsening low back pain and left hip pain
Repeat PET-CT demonstrated new lytic lesions in the left iliac crest as well as an enlargement of the liver lesion to 3 cm
Vidal Discusses Differences in Duration and AEs With Adjuvant CDK4/6i in Breast Cancer
May 13th 2025During a live event, Gregory Vidal, MD, PhD, discussed the adjuvant trials of abemaciclib and ribociclib and how their different dosing approaches and safety profiles can affect their usage in breast cancer.
Read More