Reshma L. Mahtani, DO:I would say that the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer is one of our greatest success stories in oncology. Starting with the approval of trastuzumab followed by several other agents that target HER2, we’ve dramatically improved survival for these patients.
In the first-line setting, this patient was treated with the CLEOPATRA regimen, which consists of a taxane, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab. This decision was based on really impressive improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival demonstrated by that study. I would comment that I would have probably tried to get approval of Abraxane [nab-paclitaxel] in this setting, just because she was diabetic and that would have afforded the opportunity to not give her steroids as a premedication. Second-line treatment with the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab emtansine [T-DM1] is also pretty standard based on the results of the EMILIA trial. So, I would say this patient’s treatment course was quite typical in the first- and second-line settings.
Many factors influence our treatment recommendations in the first- and second-line settings. In terms of how this patient was treated, I would say that many patients can receive treatment in the first-line setting with a taxane for about 4 to 6 months before toxicity issues start to become apparent. In this case, the treatment was stopped for neuropathy. In the situation where there’s an option to start hormonal therapy in ER+, HER2+ patients, this is usually done. This patient didn’t have that opportunity because she had ER⁻ disease.
Our decisions in this setting are informed by what treatments patients received in the adjuvant setting, any persistent toxicities from those treatments, disease burden and, of course, patient preference. In this case, because the patient had de novo metastatic disease and was symptomatic with pain, she didn’t have the option for hormonal therapy in conjunction with HER2-targeted treatment. I would say the decision making was pretty straightforward in this case.
In terms of what’s coming, there are several important studies that may change what we do in the first- and second-line settings. For example, in the second-line setting, there’s an ongoing trial looking at trastuzumab deruxtecan [DS-8201] versus T-DM1. In the first-line setting, there is a study that’s ongoing by NRG Oncology looking at the addition of immunotherapy in combination with a taxane, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab. Of course, these are ongoing studies that have not reported out yet, so our first- and second-line treatments are pretty standardized at this juncture.
Transcript edited for clarity.
Case: A 59-Year-Old Woman WithHER2+ De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer
Initial presentation
Clinical workup
Treatment and Follow-Up
Analyzing ADC Treatment Sequencing in Advanced Breast Cancer
March 15th 2024In the first article of a 2-part series, Virginia G. Kaklamani, MD, discussed her approach to biomarker testing and treatment sequencing for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Read More
Breast Cancer Leans into the Decade of Antibody-Drug Conjugates, Experts Discuss
September 25th 2020In season 1, episode 3 of Targeted Talks, the importance of precision medicine in breast cancer, and how that vitally differs in community oncology compared with academic settings, is the topic of discussion.
Listen
Uncovering the Neighborhood Influence on Breast Cancer Mortality
March 8th 2024Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, MPH, delved into the background and findings of this study assessing the correlation between neighborhood opportunity, allostatic load, and all-cause mortality among patients with breast cancer.
Read More