Emerging Therapies in Breast Cancer Excite the Field

Targeted Therapies in OncologyOctober 1, 2022
Pages: 28

Despite advances in the treatment of breast cancer, challenges remain, such as the development of resistance to existing therapies, serious adverse events, and suboptimal treatment adherence.

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP

Many novel therapeutic agents for endocrine therapy–resistant breast cancer are in the clinical trial stage of development, promising more options for patients in the near future.

A key disease management strategy for patients with hormone receptor–positive disease—the most common subtype of breast cancer—has been to modulate estrogen synthesis and/or estrogen receptor (ER) activity, because most hormone receptor–positive cancers depend on ER signaling for tumor growth and progression.1-4 This strategy offers patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer the opportunity to avoid chemotherapy until later lines of therapy.5

These endocrine therapies remain the mainstay of treatment options for patients with hormone receptor– positive breast cancer, and combinations with CDK4/6 inhibitors are a common standard-of-care first-line regimen in ER-positive metastatic disease.1,5

“We have come a long way in the treatment of all breast cancer subtypes in the past few years [SEE PAGES 69-80]. We have seen incredible gains in overall [survival (OS)] and progression-free survival [PFS] with the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors and antibody- drug conjugates [ADCs], as well as in PFS with PI3K inhibitors,” said Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP, section head for the Endocrine Therapy Research Program and clinical director for the Early Drug Development Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, during an interview with Targeted Therapies in OncologyTM.

Despite advances in the treatment of breast cancer, challenges remain, such as the development of resistance to existing therapies, serious adverse events (AEs), and suboptimal treatment adherence.1,5 There is a clear need for therapies with improved efficacy that prevent or overcome resistance to current agents, reduce/postpone the need for more toxic chemotherapy, optimize patients’ quality of life, and improve treatment outcomes.1,6

Emerging Agents in Development

Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a growing class of therapeutics that comprise a humanized monoclonal antibody bound to a cytotoxic agent via a molecular linker. When the antibody component of the ADC binds to its target antigen on the cell surface, it induces the internalization of the ADC through endocytosis. The linker is then cleaved, releasing the payload portion inside the cancer cells. This target-dependent activation of the cytotoxic agent produces tumor selectivity, signifi cantly reducing systemic AEs.7

“The recent reports about the activity of ADCs across different subtypes, including HER2-negative and HER2-positive (low and high), as well as triple- negative breast cancer [TNBC], demonstrate that these drugs are active in breast cancer. I think we are going to hear a lot about these studies in the near future and that ADCs are here to stay,” said Jhaveri.

There are several next-generation HER2-targeted ADCs under investigation in clinical trials. These agents have been designed with different payloads and linker technologies to further improve their efficacy and tolerability.7 The FDA a ccepted a biologics license application for [vic-]trastuzumab duocarmazine (SYD985) for patients with HER2-positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, based on results from the phase 3 TULIP trial (NCT03262935).8 The ADC’s antibody component, trastuzumab (Herceptin), was the first HER2-targeting monoclonal antibody developed and is used in many ADCs. Its payload is duocarmycin, a potent DNA-alkylating molecule that is membrane permeable and thus can enter neighboring cells regardless of HER2 expression.9 T he TULIP trial results showed a significant PFS improvement of 2.1 months (7.0 months vs 4.9 months, respectively; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.84; P = .002), as well as supportive OS results (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.62-1.09; P = .153), with SYD985 compared with physician’s choice of treatment in heavily pretreated patients.8,10 The most prevalent AE was ocular toxicity (78.1%) and interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (7.6%) in SYD985-treated patients.10 The Prescription Drug User Fee Act target action date for [vic-]trastuzumab duocarmazine is May 12, 2023.8

Ladiratuzumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the zinc transporter LIV-1, which is expressed in breast tumors. The expression of LIV-1 is linked to the epidermal-to-mesenchymal transition and, therefore, to poor prognosis and metastasis.11 Conjugation of ladiratuzumab to a cytotoxic payload consisting of monomethyl auristatin E (aka vedotin) produces the LIV-1–targeted ADC ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV; aka SGN-LIV1A). Monotherapy with LV is being investigated for patients with metastatic breast cancer in a phase 1 trial (NCT01969643).12 Among trial participants with TNBC, there was an objective response rate (ORR) of 32%, a disease control rate (DCR) of 64%, and a median PFS of 11.3 weeks. Additionally, a DCR of 59% was observed for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.12 The combination of LV with pembrolizumab (Keytruda), a PD-1 inhibitor, is also being evaluated in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC in the phase 1b/2 SGNLVA-002 trial (NCT03310957). There are promising preliminary results for both clinical trials.11-14

Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd; DS-1062a) targets the trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (Trop-2), which is highly expressed in various malignancies, including breast cancer. This ADC is composed of anti–Trop-2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody attached to a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor payload via a tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker.15 Compared with sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy), an FDA-approved Trop-2–targeting ADC, Dato-DXd has a longer half-life, and is thought to deliver the payload with greater efficiency, thereby reducing systemic toxicities, such as neutropenia.

In the phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 trial evaluating Dato-DXd (NCT03401385), the ORR was 34% in patients with previously treated advanced TNBC and 52% in patients not previously exposed to a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor ADC. The safety profi le was manageable, including grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs in 23% of patients and low rates of neutropenia and diarrhea.16 This agent is being evaluated in a number of trials, including TROPION-Breast02 (NCT05374512), a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial assessing first-line Dato-DXd treatment in patients with locally recurrent, inoperable, or metastatic TNBC who are not candidates for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition.17 The BEGONIA trial (NCT03742102) is investigating Dato-DXd in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab (Imfi nzi) in the first-line setting for patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC.18 Finally, the phase 3 TROPION-Breast01 trial (NCT05104866) is evaluating Dato-DXd in patients with previously treated HER2-negative breast cancer.19

XMT-2056 is an ADC that delivers a stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonist to the tumor microenvironment. The STING pathway mediates the innate immune response and is capable of inducing antitumor immune activity. In XMT-2056, a novel STING agonist payload is linked to HT-19, an HER2-targeting monoclonal antibody that binds to a novel epitope on HER2 and does not compete for binding with either trastuzumab or pertuzumab (Perjeta).20 XMT-2056 demonstrated robust antitumor activity as a monotherapy in preclinical models with both high and low HER2 expression, with enhanced efficacy when used in combination with multiple approved agents.20

Praluzatamab ravtansine (CX-2009) is a conditionally activated Probody drug conjugate made up of a CD166-directed monoclonal antibody conjugated to DM4, a cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor. The peptide mask of the agent limits target engagement with normal tissue.21 This ADC is being investigated for treatment of patients with solid tumors in the phase 1/2 PROCLAIM-CX-2009 trial (NCT03149549). Among patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, praluzatamab ravtansine showed an ORR of 15% and a clinical benefit rate of 40% in a phase 2 study of patients with advanced breast cancers (CTMX-2009-002; NCT04596150).21-23 However, ORRs in patients with advanced TNBC were less than 10%, resulting in the discontinuation of the TNBC treatment arm.

Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders

Patients with endocrine therapy–resistant breast cancer may still respond to subsequent therapies that target the ER via a different mechanism, because these tumors often remain dependent on ER signaling for growth and survival. Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) are high-affi nity competitive antagonists of the ER that immobilize and target the ER for proteasome-dependent degradation, and prevent ER signaling, thereby providing more potent inhibition of the ER.1

“Oral SERDs might have a role post CDK4/6 [inhibitor] therapy; combinations are being evaluated to further assess efficacy. These agents are also being evaluated in the adjuvant setting,” noted Jhaveri.

Elacestrant is a nonsteroidal SERD that has complex dose-related ER agonist/antagonist activity and is being developed for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer,24,25 was evaluated in 2 first-in-human studies (Study 001 [EudraCT: 2007-006547-41] and Study 004 [EudraCT: 2014-001699-67]) that demonstrated its safety and tolerability in healthy postmenopausal women.26 Furthermore, elacestrant demonstrated single-agent activity in a phase 1 study (NCT02338349) of heavily pretreated, postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer.26 The promising results from these early studies supported further assessment, which is under way in the phase 3 EMERALD trial (NCT03778931).27,28

EMERALD was the fi rst study to demonstrate greater efficacy for an oral SERD over fulvestrant (Faslodex); an FDA-approved intramuscular SERD and another type of endocrine therapy termed aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in patients who had progressed on a CDK4/6 inhibitor and an endocrine therapy.5,28 Elacestrant demonstrated a statistically signifi cant benefi t in median PFS compared with the AI group, the risk of progression or death was reduced by 30% in the overall population (P = .0018) and by 45% in patients harboring ESR1 mutations (P = .0005). Elacestrant also showed superior 12-month PFS rates compared with AIs both in the overall cohort (22.3% vs 9.4%, respectively) and in the subgroup of patients with ESR1-mutated tumors (12-month PFS rate, 26.8% vs 8.2%) (TABLE28). These results suggest that patients with partial endocrine sensitivity after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors, especially those with ESR1 mutations, derive greater benefi t from elacestrant than with other endocrine monotherapies.5,28 This finding will likely change the standard of care in the second-line metastatic setting and prompt a precision medicine approach when other targetable mutations are also present.5

In August 2022, the FDA granted a priority review to elacestrant in ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer, based on the results of EMERALD.29

Amcenestrant (SAR439859) is a nonsteroidal, orally bioavailable SERD that was initially developed as a treatment for hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, either alone or in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor.30-32 H owever, its development was recently discontinued based on results of an interim analysis of findings from the phase 3 AMEERA-5 trial (NCT04478266). An independent data monitoring committee found that the combination of amcenestrant and palbociclib (Ibrance) did not meet the prespecified boundary for continuation compared with palbociclib and letrozole.33

Camizestrant (AZD9833), another potent, orally delivered, nonsteroidal SERD, developed for the treatment of hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, was designed to further improve on the ER degradation and avoid the ER agonism observed with first-generation oral SERDs.34 An ongoing, phase 1, doseescalation study (SERENA-1; NCT03616587) is evaluating the safety and tolerability of camizestrant alone or in combination with palbociclib, everolimus (Afinitor), abemaciclib (Verzenio), or capivasertib in patients with endocrine-resistant, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer that is not amenable to treatment with curative intent.35,36 Reduction of ER and PR protein levels occurred in all dose cohorts, indicating modulation of ER signaling, and the tolerability profi le of the combination with palbociclib was consistent with those of both camizestrant and palbociclib alone.35,36 Clinical benefit was also reported with camizestrant at various dose levels, but response rates were modest. A phase 3 study (SERENA-4; NCT04711252) and 2 phase 2 studies are under way.36,37

Giredestrant (GDC-9545), a highly potent, nonsteroidal, orally bioavailable SERD, was developed for the treatment of hormone receptor–positive breast cancer.1 Results from an ongoing phase 1 study (GO39932; NCT03332797) showed that giredestrant, alone and in combination with palbociclib, was well tolerated; no dose-limiting toxicities were reported, and no maximum tolerated dose was reached. Furthermore, all tested dose levels of giredestrant demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in patients with hormone receptor–positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This activity was independent of patients’ ESR1 mutation status and whether they had received prior treatment with chemotherapy or CDK4/6 inhibitors.38,39 Giredestrant is being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials alone (lidERA Breast Cancer; NCT04961996) and with palbociclib (persevERA Breast Cancer; NCT04546009).40,41

Structure-guided investigations driven by activity in breast cancer cell lines contributed to the development of rintodestrant (G1T48), another orally bioavailable, nonsteroidal SERD, which has shown efficacy in both ESR1-mutated and wild-type preclinical models.1,42 Rintodestrant is being evaluated alone and in combination with palbociclib in an ongoing phase 1 trial (NCT03455270) in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer.42 The study showed a favorable safety profile and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in patients following progression on several lines of endocrine therapy, including in patients with tumors harboring ESR1 mutations.42

Borestrant (ZB716) is another next-generation SERD that has demonstrated preclinical activity and is being evaluated in a phase 1/2, open-label, multicenter study (ENZENO; NCT04669587).43 The aim of the study is to obtain safety and tolerability data for borestrant, alone and in combination with palbociclib, in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.44

Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) act by reducing the effects of estradiol via competitive binding of the ER.1 Tamoxifen, the original SERM, is the most prescribed therapeutic agent for ER-positive breast cancer.45 Bazedoxifene is a SERM/SERD hybrid approved for the management of osteoporosis and postmenopausal hot fl ashes.43,46

Bazedoxifene functions as a high-affi nity ERα antagonist in breast tumors and promotes ER degradation.46-48 Bazedoxifene showed antitumor activity in laboratory-based models of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer,46,49 leading to a phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate its safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer who progressed on prior endocrine therapy (NCT02448771).50

Lasofoxifene is a next-generation SERM with improved bioavailability compared with tamoxifen but similar characteristics in terms of ER binding and inhibition of coactivators.51 Initially developed for osteoporosis, lasofoxifene was found to retain antagonist activity without evidence of resistance in cancer cells harboring ESR1 mutations in preclinical models.52 These results led to the clinical evaluation of lasofoxifene in patients with ESR1-mutant metastatic breast cancer in the ELAINE (NCT03781063; monotherapy) and ELAINEII (NCT04432454; in combination with abemaciclib) trials, which are under way. A phase 3 trial of the combination is planned.53-55

In the ELAINE trial, lasofoxifene showed a median PFS of 6.04 months in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer harboring an ESR1 mutation, vs 4.04 months in patients treated with fulvestrant (HR, 0.699; 95% CI, 0.445-1.125; P = .138).55 The ORR was 13.2% for lasofoxifene compared with 2.9% for fulvestrant (P = .12), with 1 complete response noted in the lasofoxifene arm. AEs were mostly grade 1 or 2.

Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras

Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), also known as bivalent chemical protein degraders, are heterobifunctional molecules that degrade specific endogenous proteins via the E3 ubiquitin ligase pathway.56 PROTACs provide an alternative strategy for blocking protein function that moves beyond the restrictions of traditional pharmacology.56

ARV-471, an oral ER-targeting PROTAC, was designated an investigational new drug by the FDA in 2019.57 ARV-471 is designed to selectively target the ER for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.57 A phase 1/2 trial (NCT04072952) of ARV-471 alone and in combination with palbociclib is under way.58 The phase 1 dose-escalation study showed that ARV-471 was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. Furthermore, there was robust ER degradation (89% reduction) and encouraging activity, including a clinical benefit rate of 40% in CDK4/6 inhibitor–pretreated patients.59,60

Another promising PROTAC for ER-positive breast cancer is ERD-308. Preclinical studies found that ERD-308 is a highly potent and effective ER-targeting PROTAC, inducing more than 95% ER degradation at concentrations as low as 5 nM in breast cancer cell lines. Additionally, ER degradation displayed time and dose dependence, with faster degradation kinetics and more complete degradation than fulvestrant.61

In preclinical studies, AC682 demonstratedcpotent ER degradation, diminishedcexpression of ER-regulated genes, and subsequentc cell growth inhibition. Moreover, animal studies showed oral bioavailability and tolerance of AC682, as well as dose-dependent tumor growth inhibition/regression and concomitant tumor ER protein reduction in estradiol-dependent MCF7 xenograft tumors. There was clear synergy when AC682 was administered in combination with palbociclib in both estradiol-dependent and tamoxifen-resistant MCF7 models.62 A phase 1 clinical trial (NCT05080842) evaluating the safety and effectiveness of AC682 for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic ER-positive breast cancer is under way.63

PI3K Inhibitors

Breast tumors frequently exhibit dysregulation of the PI3K pathway, leading to either increased or decreased activity.64 This dysregulation may also contribute to resistance to a variety of anticancer agents.65

The novel, orally available, α-selective PI3K inhibitor MEN1611 (PA799) was evaluated in 2 preclinical breast cancer models: HER2-positive, PIK3CA-mutated breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts. MEN1611 demonstrated activity in these models both as monotherapy and in combination with HER2-targeted therapy.66 The combination exhibited synergy, including protein depletion of the α isoform and a pro-inflammatory macrophage phenotype in both model systems. A phase 1b study, B-PRECISE-01 (NCT03767335), aims to determine the appropriate dose of MEN1611 to be used in combination with trastuzumab with or without fulvestrant for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.67


1. Chen YC, Yu J, Metcalfe C, et al. Latest generation estrogen receptor degraders for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2022;31(6):515-529. doi:10.1080/13543784.2021.1983542

2. Lumachi F, Santeufemia DA, Basso SM. Current medical treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. World J Biol Chem. 2015;6(3):231-9. doi:10.4331/wjbc.v6.i3.231

3. Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, et al. Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(12):1346-1366. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.02309

4. Patel HK, Bihani T. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in cancer treatment. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;186:1-24. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.12.012

5. Sanchez KG, Nangia JR, Schiff R, Rimawi MF. Elacestrant and the Promise of Oral SERDs. J Clin Oncol. 2022:JCO2200841. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.00841

6. Partridge AH, Carey LA. Unmet Needs in Clinical Research in Breast Cancer: Where Do We Need to Go? Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(11):2611-2616. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2633

7. Ferraro E, Drago JZ, Modi S. Implementing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in HER2-positive breast cancer: state of the art and future directions. Breast Cancer Res. 2021;23(1):84. doi:10.1186/s13058-021-01459-y

8. FDA Accepts Byondis' Biologics License Application for [Vic-] Trastuzumab Duocarmazine (SYD985) in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. News release. Byondis B.V. July 12, 2022. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://bit.ly/3eNszAN

9. Dokter W, Ubink R, van der Lee M, et al. Preclinical profile of the HER2-targeting ADC SYD983/SYD985: introduction of a new duocarmycin-based linker-drug platform. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(11):2618-29. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0040-T

10. Saura Manich C, O'Shaughnessy J, Aftimos PG, et al. Primary outcome of the phase III SYD985.002/TULIP trial comparing [vic-]trastuzumab duocarmazine to physician's choice treatment in patients with pre-treated HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(suppl 5):S1283-S1346. doi:10.1016/annonc/annonc741

11. Fraguas-Sanchez AI, Lozza I, Torres-Suarez AI. Actively Targeted Nanomedicines in Breast Cancer: From Pre-Clinal Investigation to Clinic. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(5):1198. doi:10.3390/cancers14051198

12. Modi S, Pusztai L, Forero A, et al. Abstract PD3-14: Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78(4_Supplement):PD3-14. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.Sabcs17-pd3-14

13. Han HS, Alemany CA, Brown-Glaberman UA, et al. SGNLVA-002: Single-arm, open label phase Ib/II study of ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV) in combination with pembrolizumab for first-line treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15_suppl):TPS1110. doi:10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.TPS1110

14. Nagayama A, Vidula N, Bardia A. Novel Therapies for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Spotlight on Immunotherapy and Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Oncology (Williston Park). 2021;35(5):249-254. doi:10.46883/ONC.2021.3505.0249

15. 1Okajima D, Yasuda S, Maejima T, et al. Datopotamab Deruxtecan, a Novel TROP2-directed Antibody-drug Conjugate, Demonstrates Potent Antitumor Activity by Efficient Drug Delivery to Tumor Cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20(12):2329-2340. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0206

16. Krop I, Juric D, Shimizu T, et al. Abstract GS1-05: Datopotamab deruxtecan in advanced/metastatic HER2- breast cancer: Results from the phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 study. Cancer Res. 2022;82(4_Supplement):GS1-05. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.Sabcs21-gs1-05

17. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of Dato-DXd Versus Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Recurrent Inoperable or Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer, Who Are Not Candidates for PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Therapy (TROPION-Breast02). Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT053745121

18. Schmid P, Im S-A, Armstrong A, et al. BEGONIA: Phase 1b/2 study of durvalumab (D) combinations in locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)—Initial results from arm 1, d+paclitaxel (P), and arm 6, d+trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl):1023. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1023

19. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Phase-3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Dato-DXd Versus Investigator's Choice of Chemotherapy (ICC) in Participants With Inoperable or Metastatic HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Who Have Been Treated With One or Two Prior Lines of Systemic Chemotherapy (TROPION-Breast01). Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05104866

20. Duvall JR, Bukhaild RA, Cetinbas NM, et al. XMT-2056, a HER2-targeted Immunosynthen STING-agonist antibody-drug conjugate, binds a novel epitope of HER2 and shows increased anti-tumor activity in combination with trastuzumab or pertuzumab. Cancer Res. 2022;82(12_suppl):3503. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2022-3503

21. Boni V, Fidler MJ, Arkenau HT, et al. Praluzatamab Ravtansine, a CD166-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: An Open-Label Phase I/II Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(10):2020-2029. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3656

22. CytomX Therapeutics announces phase 2 results for praluzatamab ravtansine in breast cancer. News release. CytomX Therapeutics. July 6, 2022. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://bit.ly/3PhH4Kh

23. Study to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of CX-2009 monotherapy and in combination with CX-072 in advanced breast cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04596150

24. Conlan MG, de Vries EFJ, Glaudemans A, Wang Y, Troy S. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies of Elacestrant, A Novel Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, in Healthy Post-Menopausal Women. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2020;45(5):675-689. doi:10.1007/s13318-020-00635-3

25. Bardia A, Kaklamani V, Wilks S, et al. Phase I Study of Elacestrant (RAD1901), a Novel Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(12):1360-1370. doi:10.1200/jco.20.02272

26. Jager A, de Vries EGE, der Houven van Oordt CWM, et al. A phase 1b study evaluating the effect of elacestrant treatment on estrogen receptor availability and estradiol binding to the estrogen receptor in metastatic breast cancer lesions using (18)F-FES PET/CT imaging. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22(1):97. doi:10.1186/s13058-020-01333-3

27. ClinicalTrials.gov. Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant vs. Standard of Care for the Treatment of Patients With ER+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer (EMERALD). Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03778931

28. Bidard F-C, Kaklamani VG, Neven P, et al. Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022:JCO2200338. doi:10.1200/jco.22.00338

29. Menarini Group’s elacestrant granted priority review by the U.S. FDA for patients with ER+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer. News release. The Menarini Group. August 11, 2022. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://bit.ly/3BWHrqb

30. Campone M, Bardia A, Ulaner GA, et al. Abstract P5-11-02: Dose-escalation study of SAR439859, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2020;80(4_Supplement):P5-11-02. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.Sabcs19-p5-11-02

31. Chandarlapaty S, Linden HM, Neven P, et al. AMEERA-1: Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), with palbociclib (palbo) in postmenopausal women with ER+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl):1058. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1058

32. Campone M, Herold CI, Wang Q, et al. Phase II preoperative window study of SAR439859 versus letrozole in post-menopausal women with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):TPS1108. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.TPS1108

33. Sanofi provides update on amcenestrant clinical development program. News release. Sanofi. August 17, 2022. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://bit.ly/3QNef8E

34. Scott JS, Moss TA, Balazs A, et al. Discovery of AZD9833, a Potent and Orally Bioavailable Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader and Antagonist. J Med Chem. 2020;63(23):14530-14559. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01163

35. Hamilton EP, Oliveira M, Banerji U, et al. A phase I dose escalation and expansion study of the next generation oral SERD AZD9833 in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):1024. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1024

36. Baird R, Oliveira M, Gil EMC, et al. Abstract PS11-05: Updated data from SERENA-1: A Phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study of the next generation oral SERD AZD9833 as a monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4_Supplement):PS11-05. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.Sabcs20-ps11-05

37. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Comparative Study of AZD9833 Plus Palbociclib Versus Anastrozole Plus Palbociclib in Patients With ER-Positive HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Who Have Not Received Any Systemic Treatment for Advanced Disease. (SERENA-4). Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04711252

38. Jhaveri KL, Boni V, Sohn J, et al. Safety and activity of single-agent giredestrant (GDC-9545) from a phase Ia/b study in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl):1017. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1017

39. Lim E, Jhaveri KL, Perez-Fidalgo JA, et al. A phase Ib study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader GDC-9545 alone or combined with palbociclib in metastatic ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):1023. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1023

40. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Giredestrant Compared With Physician's Choice of Adjuvant Endocrine Monotherapy in Participants With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer (lidERA Breast Cancer). Accessed September 9, 2022. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04961996?term=NCT04961996&draw=1&rank=1

41. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Giredestrant Combined With Palbociclib Compared With Letrozole Combined With Palbociclib in Participants With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (persevERA Breast Cancer). Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04546009?term=NCT04546009&draw=2&rank=1

42. Dees EC, Aftimos PG, van Oordt H, et al. 340P - Dose-escalation study of G1T48, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC). Ann Oncol.;30(suppl 5):v121-v122. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz242.035

43. Lloyd MR, Wander SA, Hamilton E, Razavi P, Bardia A. Next-generation selective estrogen receptor degraders and other novel endocrine therapies for management of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: current and emerging role. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022;14:17588359221113694. doi:10.1177/17588359221113694

44. ClinicalTrials.gov. ER+/HER2- Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (ENZENO Study) (ENZENO). Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04669587

45. Shagufta, Ahmad I. Tamoxifen a pioneering drug: An update on the therapeutic potential of tamoxifen derivatives. Eur J Med Chem. 2018;143:515-531. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.11.056

46. Wardell SE, Nelson ER, Chao CA, McDonnell DP. Bazedoxifene exhibits antiestrogenic activity in animal models of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: implications for treatment of advanced disease. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(9):2420-2431. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3771

47. Wardell SE, Ellis MJ, Alley HM, et al. Efficacy of SERD/SERM Hybrid-CDK4/6 Inhibitor Combinations in Models of Endocrine Therapy-Resistant Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(22):5121-5130. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0360

48. Lewis-Wambi JS, Kim H, Curpan R, Grigg R, Sarker MA, Jordan VC. The selective estrogen receptor modulator bazedoxifene inhibits hormone-independent breast cancer cell growth and down-regulates estrogen receptor alpha and cyclin D1. Mol Pharmacol. 2011;80(4):610-620. doi:10.1124/mol.111.072249

49. Fanning SW, Jeselsohn R, Dharmarajan V, et al. The SERM/SERD bazedoxifene disrupts ESR1 helix 12 to overcome acquired hormone resistance in breast cancer cells. Elife. 2018;7:e37161. doi:10.7554/eLife.37161

50. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of Palbociclib in Combination With Bazedoxifene in Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02448771

51. Vajdos FF, Hoth LR, Geoghegan KF, et al. The 2.0 A crystal structure of the ERalpha ligand-binding domain complexed with lasofoxifene. Protein Sci. 2007;16(5):897-905. doi:10.1110/ps.062729207

52. Andreano KJ, Baker JG, Park S, et al. The Dysregulated Pharmacology of Clinically Relevant ESR1 Mutants is Normalized by Ligand-activated WT Receptor. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020;19(7):1395-1405. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-1148

53. ClinicalTrials.gov. Evaluation of Lasofoxifene Versus Fulvestrant in Advanced or Metastatic ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer With an ESR1 Mutation. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03781063

54. ClinicalTrials.gov. Evaluation of Lasofoxifene Combined With Abemaciclib in Advanced or Metastatic ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer With an ESR1 Mutation (ELAINEII). Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04432454

55. Goetz MP, Plourde P, Stover DG, et al. Open-label, randomized study of lasofoxifene (LAS) vs fulvestrant (Fulv) for women with locally advanced/metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer (mBC), an estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutation, and disease progression on aromatase (AI) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6i) inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl_7):S808-S869. doi:10.1016/annonc/annonc1089

56. Potjewyd F, Turner A-MW, Beri J, et al. Degradation of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 with an EED-Targeted Bivalent Chemical Degrader. Cell Chem Biol. 2020;27(1):47-56.e15. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.11.006

Arvinas Receives Authorization to Proceed for ARV-471, a PROTAC® Protein Degrader to Treat Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic ER+ / HER2- Breast Cancer. News release. Arvinas. June 25, 2019. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://ir.arvinas.com/news-releases/news-release-details/arvinas-receives-authorization-proceed-arv-471-protacr-protein

57. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Phase 1/2 Trial of ARV-471 Alone and in Combination With Palbociclib (IBRANCE®) in Patients With ER+/HER2- Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC). Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04072952

58. Hamilton E, Vahdat L, Han HS, et al. Abstract PD13-08: First-in-human safety and activity of ARV-471, a novel PROTAC® estrogen receptor degrader, in ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Research. 2022;82(4_Supplement):PD13-08. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.Sabcs21-pd13-08

59. Arvinas and Pfizer Announce PROTAC® Protein Degrader ARV-471 Continues to Demonstrate Encouraging Clinical Benefit Rate in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer. News release. Pfizer. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://bit.ly/3UdG3WP

60. Hu J, Hu B, Wang M, et al. Discovery of ERD-308 as a Highly Potent Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Degrader of Estrogen Receptor (ER). J Med Chem. 2019;62(3):1420-1442. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01572

61. He W, Zhang H, Perkins L, et al. Abstract PS18-09: Novel chimeric small molecule AC682 potently degrades estrogen receptor with oral anti-tumor efficacy superior to fulvestrant. Cancer Research. 2021;81(4_Supplement):PS18-09-PS18-09. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.Sabcs20-ps18-09

62. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of AC682 for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic ER+ Breast Cancer. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05080842

63. Fuso P, Muratore M, D'Angelo T, et al. PI3K Inhibitors in Advanced Breast Cancer: The Past, The Present, New Challenges and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(9):2161. doi:10.3390/cancers14092161

64. Carden CP, Stewart A, Thavasu P, et al. The Association of PI3 Kinase Signaling and Chemoresistance in Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(7):1609-1617. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.Mct-11-0996

65. Fiascarelli A, Merlino G, Capano S, et al. Characterization of the mechanism of action and efficacy of MEN1611 (PA799), a novel PI3K inhibitor, in breast cancer preclinical models. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(Suppl 5):v781-v782. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz268.065

66. ClinicalTrials.gov. MEN1611 With Trastuzumab (+/- Fulvestrant) in Metastatic Breast Cancer (B-PRECISE-01). Accessed September 9, 2022. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03767335

Related Videos
Experts on breast cancer
Expert on breast cancer
Experts on breast cancer
Expert on breast cancer
Experts on breast cancer
Expert on breast cancer
Experts on breast cancer
Expert on breast cancer
Experts on breast cancer
Related Content