Treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated the best response in patients with non–small cell lung cancer and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 90% or more, according to a correlative analysis conducted with 3-years of follow-up.
Pembrolizumab monotherapy showed the best long-term survival benefit in patients with non–small cell lung cancer and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 90% or more, according to a correlative analysis conducted with 3-years of follow-up presented at the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.
The median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.9-10.8) in the TPS of 90% or higher group vs 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.8-6.1) in the TPS of 50% to 89% group (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.86; P <.001). The median overall survival was 29.0 months (95% CI, 21.0-45.3) in the TPS of 90% or more group vs 17.8 months (95% CI, 15.3-20.9) in the TPS of 50% to 89% group (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.33-0.50; P <.0001).
The objective response rate in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 50% to 89% was 32.0% vs 47.9% in those with a PD-L1 TPS of 90% or more (P <.001).
Of note, a gene mutation enrichment analysis showed that certain genomic alterations were significantly enriched in tumors with a PD-L1 TPS of 50% to 89% compared with 90% or more. Mutations in FBXW7, STK11, KEAP1, and CTNNB1 were more common in the TPS 50% to 89% group. Additionally, those with TPS or 90% or more had high rates of tumor infiltrating T-cells, including CD8-positive (P = .04) and CD8-positive/PD-1–positive (P = .02) cells.
Patients with PD-L1 TPS of 50% or greater who received frontline pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC were enrolled and were stratified to either the PD-L1 TPS of 50% to 89% group (n = 284) or PD-L1 TPS of 90% or more group (n = 169). The median age was 69 years (range, 35-93) in the 50% to 89% group and 70 years (30-88) in the 90% or higher group, with 51.1% vs 58.0% of patients being women, and 90.9% vs 94.7% being current or former smokers. Most patients in both groups at 80.9% vs 79.9%, respectively, had an ECOG performance score of 0 or 1.
Oncogenic driver mutations observed in the TPS 50% to 89% vs TPS 90% groups were KRAS in 30.3% vs 36.1%, BRAF in 4.2% vs 3.5%, and MET in 1.7% vs 4.7%, respectively. Close to 1 in 4 patients from both group (37.7% vs 38.5%) did not have any mutations identified.
Selection of First-Line NSCLC Therapy Influenced by Delayed Testing
March 8th 2024During a Targeted Oncology™ Case-Based Roundtable™ event, Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD, asked participants how they would approach therapy for a patient with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer when biomarker testing is not yet completed. This is the second of 2 articles based on this event.
Read More
Comprehensive Molecular Testing Needed for Frontline NSCLC Treatment
February 19th 2024During a Targeted Oncology™ Case-Based Roundtable™ event, Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD, held a discussion on the use of biomarker testing in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer. This is the first of 2 articles based on this event.
Read More
Evaluating the TKI Inhibitors in Fusion-Driven NSCLC
January 5th 2024In a presentation during the 41st Annual Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium Innovative Cancer Therapy for Tomorrow conference, Jessica Lin, MD, discussed the landscape of targeted therapies in driver mutations in non–small cell lung cancer.
Read More