A 71-Year-Old Woman With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma - Episode 4
Recommendations for appropriately assessing patients with follicular lymphoma with disease progression after frontline treatment and options to consider as second-line therapy.
John P. Leonard, MD: There are a number of agents available at the time of first relapse, and many of them are also available at subsequent relapses. The key prognostic information comes from the time to progression after the first therapy. Those patients who progress within 2 years have a particularly less favorable prognosis than those patients who progress after chemoimmunotherapy after 2 years.
The duration of the first response, particularly after chemoimmunotherapy, is quite important in looking at long-term outcomes. I would generally look at a patient and look at their duration of response to their up-front therapy as a key factor in determining what I do next. If a patient progresses early, within that 2-year time frame, I’m particularly concerned. In fact, about half of those patients have transformation at the time of progression. That’s a patient who I might be more prone to rebiopsy or at least get a PET [positron emission tomography] scan to look for the presence of transformation.
If transformation is there, a more aggressive approach is with anthracyclines, if not already given, or perhaps an autotransplant. Those would be things I would think about.
The majority of patients will progress later—after 2 years from their initial therapy. Those are patients who have a relatively favorable prognosis. There are a number of options for these patients, depending on what they had before. One could often give single-agent rituximab if they had a long remission. We know that lenalidomide-rituximab can be useful and is associated with a PFS [progression-free survival] benefit and a higher response rate when combined with rituximab as second-line therapy in rituximab-relapsed patients.
Other options include chemoimmunotherapy again. If the patient had CHOP up front, you could use bendamustine-based therapy at relapse, or vice versa. If the patient had bendamustine up front, you could consider CHOP [cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine, prednisone] or other combination chemotherapies in the relapsed setting.
The use of obinutuzumab vs rituximab is another important distinction. Based on the time to progression and if the patient has more resistant disease, I might be more prone to use obinutuzumab in the more resistant disease setting, and rituximab in the more relapsed setting.
But all of these really figure into the decision as to what I would choose as second-line therapy.
Obviously, the indications for therapy include, is the patient at risk for transformation? Do they need treatment at all in the relapsed setting? All these factors figure into what we would choose in the relapsed setting for patients with follicular lymphoma.
Transcript edited for clarity.
Case: A 72-Year-Old Woman With Follicular Lymphoma