Experts weigh continuous BTK inhibitors vs fixed-duration CLL therapy, highlighting TP53/17p risk, patient logistics, and subtle zanubrutinib–acalabrutinib tolerability differences.
|Videos|November 2, 2016
Comparing the Different Frontline Treatment Options in CLL
Author(s)Steven Coutre, MD
Steven Coutre, MD, professor of medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, discusses the benefits and drawbacks of the different frontline treatment options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
Advertisement
Advertisement
Related to this article
New study shows CT-measured body fat, not BMI, links obesity to higher lung cancer risk via immune T-cell changes—hinting at prevention through weight loss.
Elranatamab reduced the risk of disease progression or death vs standard care in patients with R/R myeloma after prior anti-CD38 therapy and lenalidomide.
The investigational menin inhibitor is being evaluated in a registrational phase 2 trial for patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia.
The FDA granted orphan drug designation to Cardiff Oncology’s PLK1 inhibitor onvansertib for relapsed or refractory CMML after early phase 1 activity.
The phase 3 VERIFY trial found that rusfertide improved clinical response, reduced phlebotomy requirements, and eased symptom burden in patients with polycythemia vera receiving standard-of-care therapy.
At Rutgers Cancer Institute, neuro-oncologists met to discuss the latest trends in precision brain cancer care with FET-PET imaging, advanced molecular testing, and same-day multidisciplinary clinics.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Targeted Onc
1
ESMO 2026: ADCs and New Combinations Advance Lung Cancer Care
2
Novel ADCs Show Responses in Ovarian and Cervical Cancer at ESMO 2026
3
340B Contract Pharmacy Case Rekindles Scrutiny Over Program Intent
4
ESMO 2026: New Data Advance Prostate, Kidney, and Bladder Cancer Care
5