Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, discusses results of a biomarker analysis of the TROPiCS-02 study of sacituzumab govitecan in HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer presented at ASCO 2024.
At the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (Trodelvy) continued to show overall survival (OS) benefit in patients with pretreated, endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor (HR)–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, according to final OS results from the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study (NCT03901339).1
At this year's meeting, researchers presented a biomarker analysis of genomic alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) genes. Researchers were interested in whether tumors with weakened DDR mutations would respond better to sacituzumab govitecan treatment due to a phenomenon called synthetic lethality.
The analysis looked at genetic data from a subset of patients from the TROPiCS-02 study. They found that while saciuzumab govitecan benefited all patients compared to the control group, patients with DDR mutations seemed to have an even greater improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. This suggests that sacituzumab govitecan might work better in tumors with compromised DNA repair.
The study authors recommend further research to explore how the agent might work with other drugs that target the DNA repair pathway, potentially leading to even more effective treatments for this type of breast cancer.
Here, Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, professor in the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology and director of translational research integration at UCLA Health, who presented the findings at the 2024 ASCO meeting, dicusses the analysis and next steps.
Transcription:
0:05 | TROPiCS-02 was a randomized phase 3 trial looking at a Trop-2 directed antibody-drug conjugate, sacituzumab govitecan, vs chemotherapy of physicians' choice for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. And overall, the trial showed improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival, leading to approval of sacituzumab govitecan. At ASCO 2024, we present biomarker analysis focusing more on the payload. Sacituzumab govitecan has SN-38 as the payload, which causes inhibition of TOP-I. So the question was if there is damage in the DNA repair pathway, or DDR, would that predict for more benefit with sacituzumab govitecan based on the mechanism?
0:56 | And that's exactly what was seen that in patients who had tumors with deficiency in the DDR pathway, in the DNA damage repair pathway: Their magnitude of benefit was higher with sacituzumab govitecan as compared to those patients who didn't have tumors with damage in this pathway. The question is, should it be used in clinical practice? Not yet, because in both the subgroups, the benefit was higher with sacituzumab govitecan compared to standard chemotherapy. So these are interesting findings which require further investigation and could have implications for the future. But for now, the approval of sacituzumag govitecan for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer regardless of the biomarker, regardless of Trop-2 expression.
Leon-Ferre Explores Targeting of PIK3CA Alterations in ER+ Breast Cancer
July 24th 2024During a live Community Case Forum event in partnership with the Minnesota Society of Clinical Oncology, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, MD, discussed drugs targeting PIK3CA alterations in patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer.
Read More
Dato-DXd Shows Promise as a More Tolerable ADC in HER2-Negative mBC
July 22nd 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Igor Makhlin, MD, discussed with participants their impressions of datopotamab deruxtecan as therapy for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, and the sequential use of multiple antibody-drug conjugates.
Read More
Breast Cancer Leans into the Decade of Antibody-Drug Conjugates, Experts Discuss
September 25th 2020In season 1, episode 3 of Targeted Talks, the importance of precision medicine in breast cancer, and how that vitally differs in community oncology compared with academic settings, is the topic of discussion.
Listen