
Adagrasib Plus Cetuximab Falls Short in KRAS G12C–Mutated Colorectal Cancer
Key Takeaways
- Dual-primary end points were negative: BICR PFS 7.5 vs 8.1 months (HR 0.89; P=.32) and OS 21.6 vs 21.7 months (HR 0.83; P=.09) for adagrasib/cetuximab versus chemotherapy.
- Antitumor activity favored the targeted regimen by ORR, 47% vs 16%, with complete responses in 7% versus <1%, indicating meaningful depth of response without PFS/OS separation.
The results jeopardize the accelerated approval of adagrasib plus cetuximab for KRAS G12C–mutated mCRC.
Adagrasib (Krazati) plus cetuximab (Erbitux) did not achieve statistical significance on its dual primary end points of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy in patients with previously treated KRAS G12C–mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), although the chemotherapy-free targeted regimen demonstrated antitumor activity with a substantially higher response rate, according to final results from the phase 3 KRYSTAL-10 trial (NCT04793958) presented at the 2026 ESMO GI Cancers Congress.1
Among 461 enrolled patients, median PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.3-9.2) with adagrasib plus cetuximab vs 8.1 months (95% CI, 7.3-9.2) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.13; P =.32). Median overall survival (OS) at the later data cutoff was 21.6 months (95% CI, 18.4-25.5) with adagrasib plus cetuximab vs 21.7 months (95% CI, 18.0-24.8) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.03; P =.09), at a minimum follow-up of 26.4 months. Neither primary end point reached statistical significance.
The objective response rate (ORR) was numerically higher with adagrasib plus cetuximab than with chemotherapy: 47% (95% CI, 40-53) vs 16% (95% CI, 11-21), respectively. Complete responses occurred in 7% of patients in the adagrasib plus cetuximab arm vs less than 1% in the chemotherapy arm.
Regulatory Implications
There were high expectations for the KRYSTAL-10 trial following the success of the single-arm
The KRYSTAL-1 data supported the 2024
Following the approval,
Accelerated approvals, however, are contingent upon verification of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial. As KRYSTAL-10 was the designated confirmatory trial, the accelerated approval of adagrasib plus cetuximab is now at risk of being withdrawn by the FDA.
Safety Results From KRYSTAL-10
The safety profile of adagrasib plus cetuximab in the KRYSTAL-10 trial was consistent with the known profiles of each agent. Any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 98% of patients in the adagrasib plus cetuximab arm (n = 230) and 96% of patients in the chemotherapy arm (n = 206), with grade 3 to 5 events in 46% and 55% of patients, respectively. Serious TEAEs occurred in 9% of adagrasib plus cetuximab patients vs 12% of chemotherapy patients. TEAEs leading to discontinuation of the regimen occurred in 3% vs 2% of patients, respectively. One treatment-related death occurred in the chemotherapy arm. No new safety signals were observed.1
KRYSTAL-10 Study Design and Patient Population
KRYSTAL-10 is a global, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial evaluating adagrasib 600 mg twice daily plus cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks vs investigator's choice of chemotherapy, consisting of FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6, with or without VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors, in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer who had progressed on first-line fluoropyrimidine-based doublet chemotherapy with oxaliplatin or irinotecan.1 A total of 461 patients were randomized 1:1 to adagrasib plus cetuximab (n = 231) or chemotherapy (n = 230). Dual primary endpoints were BICR-assessed PFS (database lock April 15, 2025) and OS (database lock February 23, 2026). Key secondary end points included ORR and safety.1












































