
Durvalumab Regimen Yields Manageable Safety Profile in BCG-Naive NMIBC
Key Takeaways
- PATAPSCO enrolled high-risk NMIBC (T1 high-grade/G3 or CIS) without recent BCG; durvalumab 1500 mg q4w ×13 was combined with BCG induction and maintenance through 24 months.
- Primary endpoint was met: 12.1% grade 3/4 possibly related AEs by 6 months; individual grade 3/4 events were each 1% and spanned immune, metabolic, and thromboembolic toxicities.
Durvalumab plus BCG induction/maintenance showed a tolerable safety profile in BCG-naive NMIBC, according to the phase 3b PATAPSCO study.
Findings from the primary analysis of the phase 3b PATAPSCO study showed that adding durvalumab (Imfinzi) to BCG induction and maintenance was safe and tolerable in patients with BCG-naive, high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
Results from the trial presented at the
“There are no new safety signals identified [with durvalumab plus BCG] and [the majority of] immune-mediated AEs [imAEs] were largely low grade. I think this supports the safety of the combination of this population,” said presenting author Mark D. Tyson, MD, MPH. Tyson is a urologic oncologist in the Department of Urology, as well as as vice chair of research for the Department of Urology, vice chair of the Surgical and Procedural Committee, and chair of the Surgical Quality Subcommittee at Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona.
PATAPSCO Design
PATAPSCO is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter study conducted at 19 sites across the United States. Eligible patients were adults 18 years of age or older with high-risk NMIBC who had not received prior intravesical BCG or had received BCG that was stopped more than 3 years before study entry. Patients were also required to have high-risk tumors, defined as stage T1, high-grade or G3 disease, or carcinoma in situ (CIS).
All enrolled patients received durvalumab at 1500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for 13 cycles, combined with BCG induction therapy weekly for 6 weeks and BCG maintenance therapy as 3 doses at weekly intervals at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
The primary end point was the incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs possibly related to study treatment that occurred within 6 months of treatment initiation, as assessed by the investigator. Key secondary end points included broader safety and tolerability parameters, including serious AEs, immune-mediated AEs, AEs resulting in treatment interruption or discontinuation, and laboratory findings.
Baseline Characteristics
Patients were enrolled onto the study between August 2023 and December 2024, with a data cutoff of June 30, 2025, and a median follow-up for safety of 10.8 months (Q1, Q3: 8.0-14.3).
Of 132 patients screened, 99 received treatment. At the data cutoff, 73 patients were ongoing on any study treatment, 88 were ongoing in the study, and 26 had discontinued both durvalumab and BCG. Eleven patients terminated the study due to patient withdrawal (n = 5), death (n = 2), loss to follow-up (n = 1), or other reasons (n = 3).
In the treated population, the median age was 70.0 years (Q1, Q3: 64.0-77.0); 27% of patients were younger than 65 years, 37% were aged 65 years to younger than 75, and 35% were 75 years of age or older. The majority of patients were male (86%), White (93%), had an ECOG performance status of 0 (90%), had CIS (62%), and had papillary tumors (92%). Regarding tumor stage, 49%, 43%, and 8% of patients had T1, Ta, and CIS-only disease, respectively.
Additional Safety Data
Any AE was reported in 94% of patients in the overall safety population (n = 99). Maximum grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 29% of patients, 16% of which were possibly related to any study treatment, 15% of which were possibly related to durvalumab, and 3% of which were possibly related to BCG.
Any serious AEs were reported in 19% of patients. Maximum grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 17% of patients, 6% of which were possibly related to any study treatment, 5% of which were possibly related to durvalumab, and 1% of which were possibly related to BCG. Of note, 1 patient experienced a serious AE of myocardial infarction unrelated to study treatment.
Treatment discontinuation due to any AE occurred in 23% of patients; of these, 21% were possibly related to any study treatment, 18% were possibly related to durvalumab, and 4% were possibly related to BCG.
Any PRAEs to any study treatment were reported in 83% of patients. By system organ class and individual event, the most common (≥10%) PRAEs were as follows:
- Renal and urinary disorders: 44%, including dysuria (24%), pollakiuria (22%), hematuria (16%), and micturition urgency (14%)
- General disorders and administration site conditions: 35%, including fatigue (29%) and chills (10%)
- Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: 26%, including rash (12%)
- Gastrointestinal disorders: 23%, including diarrhea (12%)
- Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders: 23%, including arthralgia (10%)
No unexpected AEs were reported with durvalumab plus BCG.
Immune-Mediated AEs
Any-grade immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) were reported in 20% of patients in the overall safety population, with maximum grade 3/4 imAEs in 5% of patients. At the data cutoff, imAEs had resolved in 6 of 20 patients (30%) who experienced any imAE, and 42% of reported imAE events had resolved.
The most common imAE was hypothyroidism (any grade, 9%; grade 3/4, 0%). Other imAEs of note included hyperthyroidism (2%; 0%), thyroiditis (2%; 0%), increased blood thyroid-stimulating hormone levels (2%; 0%), maculopapular rash (2%; 1%), arthralgia (2%; 0%), autoimmune nephritis (1%; 1%), colitis (1%; 1%), pancreatitis (1%; 1%), diabetic ketoacidosis (1%; 1%), and type I diabetes mellitus (1%; 0%).
Hypothyroidism, maculopapular rash, arthralgia, autoimmune nephritis, colitis, pancreatitis, and diabetic ketoacidosis led to treatment discontinuation in 1 patient each. Systemic corticosteroid intervention was required for hypothyroidism (1%), maculopapular rash (2%), arthralgia (2%), autoimmune nephritis (1%), colitis (1%), and pancreatitis (1%).
Significance of the Data
Tyson concluded by stating that the primary safety data from PATAPSCO support the further evaluation of durvalumab plus BCG in BCG-naive, high-risk NMIBC and build on the DFS benefit previously demonstrated in the phase 3 POTOMAC trial (NCT03528694).
DISCLOSURES: Tyson reported consulting fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, enGene, Ferring, ImmunityBio, Protara, and UroGen. The PATAPSCO study was funded by AstraZeneca. Medical writing and editorial support were provided by Emma Beddie, BSc(Hons), of Parexel International, funded by AstraZeneca.


































