
Lurbinectedin Second-Line SCLC Indication to Be Withdrawn After LAGOON
Key Takeaways
- Jazz plans an FDA labeling supplement to withdraw the accelerated-approval second-line metastatic SCLC indication after LAGOON missed its OS primary endpoint in both experimental arms.
- LAGOON randomized 724 relapsed SCLC patients to lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m², lurbinectedin 2.0 mg/m² plus irinotecan, or topotecan/irinotecan across >200 sites.
Jazz moves to drop Zepzelca’s second-line SCLC use after LAGOON misses survival, while first-line maintenance combo remains approved.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plans to submit a labeling supplement to the FDA in the third quarter of 2026 requesting removal of the second-line metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) indication for lurbinectedin (Zepzelca). The company disclosed the plan August 3, 2026, alongside its second-quarter 2026 financial results, stating that the decision follows results from the phase 3 LAGOON trial (NCT05153239) and reflects alignment with the FDA on next steps.1 The first-line maintenance indication for lurbinectedin in combination with atezolizumab (Tecentriq) will not be affected.
Abou the LAGOON Trial
The randomized, open-label LAGOON trial enrolled 724 patients with relapsed SCLC across more than 200 sites in the US, Canada, and Europe whose disease had progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy with or without an anti–PD-(L)1 agent.3 Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to lurbinectedin monotherapy at 3.2 mg/m2 (n = 240), lurbinectedin at 2.0 mg/m2 plus irinotecan at 75 mg/m2 (n = 242), or investigator's choice of topotecan or irinotecan (n = 242). The trial did not meet its primary end point of overall survival (OS) for either lurbinectedin arm vs control.
Across the overall population, median OS was 8.7 months with lurbinectedin monotherapy, 10.9 months with the lurbinectedin-irinotecan combination, and 10.7 months with control therapy The HR for monotherapy vs control was 1.190 (95% CI, 0.959-1.476); the HR for the combination vs control was 0.902 (95% CI, 0.729-1.115). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases who received lurbinectedin monotherapy fared worse, with a median OS of 7.1 months and an HR of 1.791 (95% CI, 1.162-2.760) vs control; among patients without CNS metastases, median OS was 9.6 months with monotherapy and 11.1 months with the combination.
No new safety signals emerged. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 78.5% of patients on lurbinectedin monotherapy compared with 95.0% on the combination regimen and 93.8% on control therapy; grade 3 or higher TRAEs were reported in 35.0%, 62.6%, and 64.4% of patients, respectively.
First-Line Maintenance Indication Remains Unaffected
The first-line maintenance indication, unaffected by the planned label change, rests on the
"[Lurbinectedin] is an important treatment in SCLC and, based on the strength of the IMforte trial [NCT05091567] results, we believe its most beneficial use is in the first-line maintenance setting in combination with immunotherapy given the rapid progression of metastatic SCLC after first-line chemotherapy induction,” said Rob Iannone, MD, MSCE, executive vice president, global head of research and development, and chief medical officer of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, in a news release.3










































