
Guideline Recommendations vs Real-World Experience in Treating Patients With EGFR-Mutant NSCLC
Panelists discuss how real-world practice blends evidence-based guidance with individualized adjustments for high-risk EGFR-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases.
Episodes in this series

Panelists discuss how real-world practice often diverges from guideline recommendations due to access barriers, toxicity management, and individual patient complexities. Although evidence-based protocols provide structure, clinicians frequently adapt treatment plans to accommodate nuanced scenarios like comorbidities or organ-specific metastases.
They point out that co-alterations such as TP53 mutations and liver metastases introduce additional risk, often correlating with poorer outcomes and influencing first-line selection. The subgroup analyses from MARIPOSA and FLAURA-2 provide valuable insight into these high-risk populations, guiding clinicians toward more aggressive or combination-based approaches.
Experience-based adaptation of guidelines allows for tailored care without compromising evidence-based rigor. Panelists stress the importance of integrating both structured recommendations and clinical intuition to achieve optimal patient outcomes.








































