
Ivonescimab Bests Pembrolizumab on Overall Survival in PD-L1+ NSCLC
Key Takeaways
- Interim overall survival met a preplanned secondary endpoint, favoring ivonescimab over pembrolizumab in first-line PD-L1 TPS ≥1% advanced NSCLC, with detailed OS metrics forthcoming.
- Progression-free survival was the primary endpoint and improved from 5.82 months with pembrolizumab to 11.14 months with ivonescimab (HR 0.51; independent radiologic review).
Ivonescimab extends survival and doubles PFS versus pembrolizumab in first-line PD‑L1+ metastatic NSCLC, with manageable safety.
According to a preplanned secondary end point analysis of the phase 3 HARMONi-2 trial (NCT05499390), ivonescimab (AK112) monotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) compared with pembrolizumab (Keytruda) monotherapy in patients with PD-L1–positive locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).1
Detailed results from the interim OS analysis, including the magnitude of the treatment effect, are expected to be presented at an upcoming international medical conference and published in a peer-reviewed journal.
The latest findings build on the study's previously reported progression-free survival (PFS) results. In May 2024, a prespecified interim analysis found that ivonescimab met the primary end point of PFS, with a median PFS of 11.14 months compared with 5.82 months for pembrolizumab. In the
“To date, ivonescimab has achieved dual positive OS and PFS outcomes across multiple [p]hase [3] head-to-head trials vs PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. This growing body of evidence strengthens our confidence in its potential across a broader range of solid tumors,” Dr Yu Xia, president and CEO of Akeso, stated in a news release.1 “With its unique dual mechanism of action combining immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis, we believe ivonescimab offers a more effective treatment option for patients and will contribute meaningfully to the evolving oncology treatment landscape."
Safety Profile
The safety profile of ivonescimab was reported as manageable in a previously published analysis of HARMONi-2, although grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred more frequently with ivonescimab than with pembrolizumab, at 29% and 16%, respectively.3 In the analysis, grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events occurred in 7% of patients in the ivonescimab group and 8% in the pembrolizumab group.
About the HARMONi-2 Trial
HARMONi-2 is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, registrational phase 3 study in China evaluating ivonescimab monotherapy against pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 at a tumor proportion score (TPS) of at least 1%.2
HARMONi-2 is part of a broader clinical development program for ivonescimab in NSCLC. The phase 3 HARMONi trial (NCT06396065) is evaluating ivonescimab plus chemotherapy compared with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC following treatment with a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Another phase 3 study, HARMONi-3 (NCT05899608), is evaluating ivonescimab plus chemotherapy against pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression.
About Ivonescimab and Clinical Development
Ivonescimab is a bispecific antibody designed to simultaneously target PD-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Its tetravalent structure is intended to combine the immune-mediated effects associated with PD-1 blockade with the antiangiogenic effects associated with VEGF inhibition in a single molecule. The molecule has been designed with cooperative binding properties, with higher affinity for PD-1 in the presence of VEGF.
While ivonescimab is approved and commercially available in China, the agent remains investigational in the United States and Europe, with a
































