
Next Steps for Acalabrutinib/Obinutuzumab in Treatment-Naive CLL
Jeff Sharman, MD, discusses the clinical implications for oncologists based on data from the ELEVATE-TN trial.
Jeff Sharman, MD, medical director of hematology research at US Oncology, discusses the clinical implications for oncologists based on data from the
The study sought to assess treatment with acalabrutinib (Calquence) with or without obinutuzumab (Gazyva) in treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Here, Sharman also discusses potential avenues for future research in light of the 6-year follow-up results from the study.
Transcription:
0:10 | I think if a patient is going to be treated with a [Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK)] inhibitor, particularly acalabrutinib, I think that the physician needs to have a thoughtful discussion with their patients about whether or not to add the additional anti-CD20 antibody. I do think that a growing number of key opinion leaders have started doing that more frequently. It still remains a little bit controversial, so we will see how this is received by the field. I hope it sparks some conversation.
0:40 | There are a handful of approaches you can take to treat a previously treated [patient with] CLL. That could be BTK monotherapy. It could be obinutuzumab with a BTK inhibitor. It could be obinutuzumab with venetoclax [Venclexta] or a BTK [inhibitor] with a BCL2 [inhibitor]. There are really 4 different strategies emerging. We want to know what is going to be the best one. We are currently conducting a randomized study in which all patients receive venetoclax and half receive obinutuzumab, half receive acalabrutinib, and I am hoping that that gives us some good insight into picking optimal first-line therapy, but there are patients where we are not going to want to choose venetoclax. For those patients, acalabrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab represents a good option.










































