scout

Videos

Evan Y. Yu, MD, discusses how community oncologists can critically weigh the evidence from studies on androgen deprivation therapy plus androgen receptor pathway inhibitors regimens by considering factors such as efficacy, safety, patient comorbidities, and treatment preferences, and how the collective trial results guide individualized treatment decision-making to optimize outcomes for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

James J. Harding, MD, compares the responses observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) therapy in the CheckMate 9DW trial to other first-line (1L) immunotherapy (IO) regimens for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), including the HIMALAYA 5-year update (STRIDE) and the IMbrave150 trial (atezolizumab [ATEZO] + bevacizumab [BEV]), highlighting differences in efficacy and treatment outcomes.

Evan Y. Yu, MD, discusses how safety data for first-line androgen deprivation therapy plus androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) regimens such as darolutamide, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide reveal clinically relevant distinctions in their safety profiles, including the most common and challenging toxicities, incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events, treatment discontinuations, and potential drug-drug interactions. He highlights key factors that influence treatment choice and disease management in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Panelists discuss key learnings from recent studies on lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS) treatment, identify remaining knowledge gaps, and offer final takeaways, including their thoughts on the role of luspatercept in the evolving LR-MDS treatment landscape, clinical pearls for community oncologists, and major unanswered questions that could improve outcomes for LR-MDS and anemia management in the future.

Panelists discuss second-line (2L) treatment strategies for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS), focusing on how to choose a 2L treatment for patients refractory to first-line options, and provide an overview of recent updates from the IMerge trial (Santini et al, EHA 2024; Zeidan et al, JCO 2024), while considering the role of imetelstat in treatment sequencing according to NCCN Guidelines MDS-5.

Thomas W. LeBlanc, MD, MA, discusses how erythroid maturation agents (EMAs), such as luspatercept, are increasingly important in the anemia management landscape for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS), with a focus on achieving hemoglobin levels ≥ 10, as highlighted by Santini et al in their ASH 2024 abstract, demonstrating the clinical significance of this target for improving patient outcomes.

Aimee Merino, MD, discusses how the latest efficacy outcomes from the CARTITUDE-4 trial, evaluating ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, have influenced her approach to patient selection and referral for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in early relapse cases.

Aimee Merino, MD, discusses how the referral process for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in early relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma involves assessing eligibility, identifying potential roadblocks, and determining which patients may not be suitable for referral based on clinical factors and treatment goals.

Evan Y. Yu, MD, discusses how the ARANOTE study, which evaluated androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus darolutamide for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), aimed to assess the efficacy of this combination therapy in a patient population with newly diagnosed mHSPC. He compares its design and objectives with other established ADT plus androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) doublet regimens such as LATITUDE, STAMPEDE D, ENZAMET, ARCHES, and TITAN, and how the study’s results, particularly its efficacy data, compare with those from other trials using abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide in the first-line setting.

James J. Harding, MD, discusses the primary (overall survival [OS]) and secondary end points (overall response rate [ORR], duration of response [DOR]) of the CheckMate 9DW trial, and explores how the inclusion of the lenvatinib (LEN) arm informs the treatment landscape, as well as the safety profiles of first-line systemic immunotherapy in patients with uHCC, focusing on the most significant adverse events seen with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI).

Evan Y. Yu, MD, discusses how the presentation of a patient with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) involves evaluating key clinical features such as disease extent, symptoms, and performance status to guide treatment decisions and the selection of appropriate systemic therapies.