BRAIN CANCER

HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

BREAST CANCER

Bladder Cancer

Prostate Cancer

Renal Cell Carcinoma

GENITOURINARY CANCERS

Liquid Biopsies

GENOMIC TESTING

Colorectal Cancer

GASTRIC CANCER

GIST

GI CANCERS

Cervical Cancer

ENDOMETRIAL CANCER

Ovarian Cancer

GYNECOLOGIC CANCERS

HEAD & NECK CANCERS

BONE MARROW & STEM CELL TRANSPLANT

HEMATOLOGY

CAR T-CELL THERAPY

IMMUNOTHERAPY

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

LEUKEMIAS

MET-TARGETED THERAPY

SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

BIOMARKER-DRIVEN LUNG CANCER

EGFR+ Lung Cancer

LUNG CANCER

DLBCL

Follicular Lymphoma

Mantle Cell Lymphoma

LYMPHOMAS

MPNs

MULTIPLE MYELOMA

NTRK GENE FUSIONS

SARCOMA

Melanoma

SKIN CANCERS

THYROID CANCERS

NEWS

All News

FDA Briefs

Oncology Icons

Special Reports

Voices from the Field

CONFERENCES

Conference Coverage

Conference Listing

Data Dialogue with the Oncology Brothers

MEDIA

All Videos

Case-Based Peer Perspectives

Expert Perspective Virtual Tumor Board

Interviews

Investigator Perspectives

Medical World News

Pivotal Practice Views with the Oncology Brothers

Podcasts

Precision Medicine

PUBLICATIONS

All Publications

Evolving Paradigms

Peers & Perspectives in Oncology

Targeted Therapies in Oncology

CME/CE

RESOURCES

Case-Based Roundtable Series

Clinical Trials

Partners

Precision Medicine Perspectives

Press Releases

Treatment Resources

SUBSCRIBE

eNewsletter

Print Subscription

Targeted Oncology provides news, videos, and reviews on the rapidly evolving world of targeted therapies and immunotherapy for oncologists treating patients in a community setting.

About Us

Advertise

Contact Us

CureToday.com

CancerNetwork.com

OncLive.com

OncNursingNews.com

Do Not Sell My Information

Privacy

Terms & Conditions

Targeted Oncology - Immunotherapy, Biomarkers, and Cancer Pathways

Facebook

Linkedin

Twitter

YouTube

Instagram

Featured Clinical Focus

BTK Inhibitors: In-Focus

Biomarker-Driven Lung Cancer

Bone Marrow & SCT

CAR T-Cell Therapy

EGFR-Positive Lung Cancer

Endometrial Cancer

Lung Cancer

Multiple Myeloma

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Thyroid Cancers

Clinical Focus

Brain Cancer

Breast Cancer

Gastrointestinal Cancer

Genitourinary Cancers

Gynecologic Cancers

Head & Neck Cancers

Hematology

Leukemias

Lymphomas

Sarcoma

Skin Cancers

Spotlight

1rem

Clinical

Two doses of CD40HVac, a therapeutic vaccine targeting dendritic cells, are being evaluated as treatment for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer in a phase 1/2a trial.

Dosing Begins in Phase 1/2a Trial of CD40HVac in HPV+ Oropharyngeal Cancer

Patients with heavily pretreated head and neck cancer achieved an overall response rate of 24% with enfortumab vedotin in the phase 2 EV-202 study.

Enfortumab Vedotin Elicits Compelling Data in Head and Neck Cancer

A coprimary end point in the phase 3 LEAP-010 study will not be met. 

LEAP-010 Study Discontinued for Patients with PD-L1-Expressing HNSCC

The FDA has approved avasopasem for patients with head and neck cancer to treat their radiotherapy-induced severe oral mucositis. 

FDA Rejects NDA for Avasopasem in RT-Induced Severe Oral Mucositis

The phase 1b/2 ASP-1929-181 continues to investigate the photoimmunotherapy, ASP-1929, in combination with anti-EGFR therapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer and other solid tumors. 

Treatment With ASP-1929 Plus Anti-PD-1 Therapy Shows Promise in Advanced HNSCC

Jimmy Caudell, MD, PhD, senior member and vice chair for the Clinical Research Department of Radiation Oncology at Moffitt Cancer Center, discusses the overall incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and negative oropharyngeal cancers in the United States.

According to Caudell, patients with HPV-positive cancers are overall younger in age while the incidence of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer is increasing among older adults.

However, the overall incidence of HPV-positive oropharynx cancers is increasing in the United States as a whole. At the same time, the incidence of HPV-negative cancer is decreasing. Both are likely linked with the impact of smoking and cancer stage of patients.

 Overall, the incidence of oropharyngeal cancer is relatively stable, but within the incidence of HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer, it is increasing quite rapidly, whereas HPV-negative, at least in the United States, is decreasing. Recent publications released in the last 5-10 years consider HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer to be an epidemic.

Similar to many other smoking-related cancers, HPV-negative cancers of the head and neck have been decreasing because people have been smoking less or not smoking at all. HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer is increasing in incidence because, at the base of it, it is a sexually transmitted disease.

Videos

Jimmy Caudell, MD, PhD, discusses the overall incidence of human papillomavirus-positive and negative oropharyngeal cancers in the United States.


News

Varying Incidence of HPV-Positive and Negative Oropharyngeal Cancers

Jean Bourhis, MD, a professor of radiation oncology at the University of Paris, discusses results from the phase 2 study of xevinapant plus chemoradiation vs placebo and chemoradiation in patient with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN; NCT02022098).

Results from the 5-year analysis of the study were presented during the European Society of Medical Oncology Congress 2022 by Bourhis. It was shown that the addition of xevinapant to standard-of-care chemoradiation improved the durability of responses in patients with LA SCCHN.

The study was a phase 2 randomized trial comparing placebo versus xevinapant with standard of care in patients with locally advanced from cell carcinoma the head and neck. These patients were really high-risk patients, the most advanced among the locally advanced cases. And we knew already that xevinapant was active and well tolerated in the same study. tThe results that we presented [at ESMO] are long-term follow up results. And especially we have data here on overall survival at 5 years, which we didn't have before.

 What do we see here in this study with long-term follow up the 5-year overall survival is markedly improved with the xevinapant when compared to placebo. And there is nearly a doubling of the overall survival at 5 years. The data [shows that] it's from 28%, with placebo to 53% with xevinapant and we can say that in this selection of patients, again with really high-risk, locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. This is something we've never seen in the last 3 decades because the standard of care, cisplatin radiotherapy, has never been improved with the new treatme

Jean Bourhis, MD, discusses results from the phase 2 study of xevinapant plus chemoradiation vs placebo and chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Duration of Response With Xevinapant Plus Standard Chemoradiation in LA SCCHN

Joseph M. Curry, MD, a professor in the department of otolaryngology and vice chairman of research at Thomas Jefferson University, discusses the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of patients with head and neck cancers.

Anti–PD-1 therapies have shown efficacy in head and neck cancer in clinical trials, leading to the approval of pembrolizumab (Keytruda) based on the KEYNOTE-012 trial (NCT01848834), and nivolumab (Opdivo) based on the CheckMate 141 trial (NCT02105636) for recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Curry notes that pembrolizumab is now considered first-line therapy for unresectable metastatic disease based on the results of the KEYNOTE-048 trial (NCT02358031).

ICIs also have potential for use in the neoadjuvant setting even for resectable disease. Curry and other investigators are conducting a phase 1 trial (NCT03618654) of durvalumab (Imfinzi) and metformin in head and neck squamous carcinoma. The trial is exploring the efficacy of PD-1 inhibition in the 4-week window prior to surgery, indicating that ICIs play multiple valuable roles in treating head and neck cancer.

 ICIs have been a popular and exciting development because of the efficacy they've shown in head and neck cancer—specifically within head and neck cancer, anti–PD-1 therapy. So, both pembrolizumab and nivolumab have been approved for the treatment of recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer and squamous cell carcinoma because of the efficacy that they've shown in a number of clinical trials. And in fact, after the initial approval, they've moved up in the algorithm such that pembrolizumab is now included in first line therapy for metastatic and inoperable disease.

And so, these therapies have really expanded what we think of as options in terms of non-surgical therapies. And in terms of this specific clinical trial, they've also expanded how we approach disease, which is in some cases operable, looking at neoadjuvant strategies for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Joseph M. Curry, MD, discusses the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of patients with head and neck cancers.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Offer New Approaches in Head and Neck Cancer

Christine Dierks, MD, senior physician at the University Hospital Freiburg in Germany, describes the prognosis of the anaplastic thyroid carcinoma and differentiated thyroid cancer populations.

Dierks says that the prognosis is very poor for both patient populations but especially for those with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Poor outcomes are seen with patients who have anaplastic thyroid carcinoma even if they have combined therapy, which can include surgery and radiotherapy, followed by chemotherapy. In these patients, the life expectancy is about 4 to 5 months after therapy, according to Dierks.

In terms of survival, there is an exception for patients who had 

-positive disease because imatinib (Gleevec) is available for these patients. Dierks notes that for the other 80% of patients, the prognosis remains poor due to a lack of agents.

Christine Dierks, MD, describes the prognosis of the anaplastic thyroid carcinoma and differentiated thyroid cancer populations.










Outcomes Underscore Need for New Agents to Treat Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma

Christopher Nutting, MD, joint head of the Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging at The Institute of Cancer Research and consultant clinical oncologist at The Royal Marsden, discusses the results of a randomized phase 3 trial using dysphagia-optimized intensity modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard IMRT (S-IMRT) in patients with head and neck cancer.

This study included 112 patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive either S-IMRT or Do-IMRT. The primary end point was the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), which was collected 12 months after patients completed treatment. Most of the patients were male, and the most common tumor location was the oropharynx. Among the patients participating, 90% had prior chemotherapy and radiation, which is standard protocol in this setting. A majority of patients were human papilloma virus-positive, which is a group with good long-term prognosis for carrying the burden of the treatment, according to Nutting.

Nutting says the first finding in the study was that the investigators were able to reduce the radiation dose to the muscles in the experimental arm, which is what the investigators were hoping for. The MDADI score at 12 months was about 70 points out of 100 in the group of patients receiving S-IMRT, which is expected in pretrial analyses. The Do-IMRT group had about 78 points for the MDADI score. This was statistically significant, with a 

value of 0.016. A score difference of 5 to 10 points is considered to be a clinically relevant improvement in the MDADI score, he explains.

<< View more resources and information in head and neck cancers

Christopher Nutting, MD, discusses the results of a randomized phase 3 trial using dysphagia-optimized intensity modulated radiotherapy versus standard IMRT in patients with head and neck cancer.

Dysphagia-Optimized IMRT Shows Significance in Head and Neck Cancer

Robert L. Ferris, MD, PhD, director of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center; Hillman Professor of Oncology; associate vice chancellor for cancer research; professor of otolaryngology, immunology, and radiation oncology; co-director, Tumor Microenvironment Center, discusses the rationale for evaluating STING agonists as treatment for patients with head and neck cancers. ADU-S100/MIW815, in particular, is under evaluation in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in the phase II ADU-CL-20 clinical trial for patients with PD-L1–positive recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

The compound is a proinflammatory agonist that stimulates the STING pathway, says Ferris. Data have shown that the STING pathway is an important inflammatory pathway in a number of epithelial cancers, including head and neck cancer.

Data suggest that intralesional and intratumoral injection with a STING agonist, such as ADU-S100/MIW815 and other compounds that stimulate the STING pathway, can trigger beneficial inflammation and draw immune cells into the tumor microenvironment, says Ferris. This was the rationale for evaluating this agent in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor in the phase II study.

Robert L. Ferris, MD, PhD, discusses the rationale for evaluating STING agonists as treatment for patients with head and neck cancers. 

Rationale for Evaluating STING Agonists in Head and Neck Cancer

Standard Approach to Treating DLBCL

Treatment Limitations in DLBCL

Selecting Therapy for Relapsed-Refractory DLBCL

Anti-CD19 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in DLBCL

CAR T-Cell Therapy in DLBCL

Tailoring Therapy for Patients With DLBCL

Emerging Data in R/R DLBCL

Marcelo C. Pasquini, MD, associate professor of medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin and senior scientific director of Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Clinical Trials Support, discusses the rationale for analyzing real-world data for the use of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, as a treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This CD19 CAR T cell was approved 2 years ago for use in both ALL and DLBCL.

When the FDA approved the CAR T cell, the FDA mandated that the industry develop an infrastructure to follow these patients long-term as part of the approval process. There were concerns over whether these patients would develop secondary malignancies in the process of manufacturing the cells, so patients had to be followed for 15 years.

Marcelo C. Pasquini, MD, discusses the rationale for analyzing real-world data for the use of tisagenlecleucel, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, as a treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This CD19 CAR T cell was approved 2 years ago for use in both ALL and DLBCL.

Analyzing Real-World Data for CAR T-Cell Therapy in Patients With ALL and DLBCL

TRK as Ideal Candidate for Targeted Therapy

Scientific Rationale for Development of TRK Inhibitors

Early Development of TRK Inhibitor-Larotrectinib

Efficacy of TRKi-Larotrectinib Among Tumor Types

Safety and Efficacy Profile for TRKi-Larotrectinib

Patient Selection for TRKi-Larotrectinib

TRKi: High Response Rate in Patients With Primary CNS Disease

Entrectinib-A Multitargeted TKI

Entrectinib-Selective ROS Inhibition

Investigational Approaches for TRK-Fusion Cancers

NGS Testing to Detect TRK Fusions

Molecular Testing for RAI-Refractory Thyroid Cancer

Dirty Kinases in TRK-Fusion Malignancies

TRK Inhibitors: A Tumor Agnostic Approach to Treatment of Solid Tumors

Danny Rischin, MD, director, Division of Cancer Medicine, head, Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses results from the protocol-specified final analysis of the phase III KEYNOTE-048 trial of pembrolizumab (Keytruda) as frontline therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Conference News

Final KEYNOTE-048 Results With Frontline Pembrolizumab in Recurrent/Metastatic HNSCC

In the coming years, we are going to continue to see the development and FDA approval of a lot of novel targeted drugs for patients with relapsed large-cell lymphoma. And I think specifically, a lot of these drugs are being developed for patients who are failing a transplant, or are ineligible for a transplant, or cannot get into a remission with salvage chemotherapy. I mentioned tafasitamab. I talked a little about CAR [chimeric antigen receptor] T cells, polatuzumab. There are several other drugs also being developed in this space, which are biological, and some of them are targeted drugs.

As we move forward, as these drugs all become available to the clinician, the big thing is going to be deciding which of these drugs to use in which patient populations. This decision should be based on the drug&rsquo;s adverse-effect profile, as well as the activity of the drug. In patients, for example, who potentially have compromised organ function, we might not want to use drugs like CAR T cells that could have a really tough effect on their performance status, or drugs that maybe affect heart function or kidney function.

HEAD & NECK CANCERS

Latest News