Melanoma

During a live event, Thach-Giao Truong, MD, moderated a discussion on treating a 78-year-old patient with metastatic melanoma with immunotherapy.

During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Evan J. Lipson, MD, moderated a discussion on the tolerability of immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma and when to stop therapy.

During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Thach-Giao Truong, MD, discussed goals and barriers to treatment when using combination immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma in the second article of a 2-part series.

During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Thach-Giao Truong, MD, discussed how data from the CheckMate-067 and RELATIVITY-047 affect their choice of therapy for metastatic melanoma in the first article of a 2-part series.

The biologics license application for RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) plus nivolumab in advanced melanoma was accepted by the FDA with priority review.

Vusolimogene oderparepvec plus nivolumab showed responses and a favorable safety profile in advanced melanoma post-anti–PD-1 therapy, per phase 2 IGNYTE trial data.

In an interview, Vincent Law, of Moffitt Cancer Center, discussed a new study that offers hope for patients with melanoma brain metastasis.

The FDA has received a biologics license application submission for RP1 plus nivolumab in patients with PD-1 inhibitor–exposed melanoma.

Meredith McKean, MD, MPH, discussed findings from a longer-term follow-up study evaluating fianlimab plus cemiplimab for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ahmad Tarhini, MD, PhD, discussed the indirect comparison of ipilimumab plus nivolumab and nivolumab/relatlimab in advanced melanoma in the second article of a 2-part series.

TH17 cells may be a potential biomarker to predict the risk of immune-related adverse events in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving the combination therapy of nivolumab, ipilimumab, and tocilizumab.

During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ahmad Tarhini, MD, PhD, discussed the 2024 update to the RELATIVITY-047 trial in advanced melanoma in the first article of a 2-part series.

Fianlimab combined with cemiplimab demonstrated persistent and significant clinical activity in patients with advanced melanoma, regardless of LAG-3 or PD-L1 expression.

Atezolizumab following vemurafenib and cobimetinib shows improved overall survival in BRAF V600–positive melanoma, but not statistically significant.

Long-term findings from KEYNOTE-006, a phase 3 trial, support pembrolizumab as a standard-of-care for patients with advanced melanoma.

Nivolumab, alone or with ipilimumab, significantly improved 10-year overall and melanoma-specific survival vs ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma, according to final phase 3 CheckMate 067 trial data.

RP1 with nivolumab treatment for patients with melanoma after progression on anti–PD-1 offers durable responses and a favorable safety profile, as shown in the IGNYTE study.

Meredith McKean, MD, discusses a longer-term follow-up study investigating fianlimab and cemiplimab immunotherapy in advanced melanoma.

The novel agent VMT01 is designed to target and deliver 212Pb to MC1R-expressing tumors like metastatic melanoma.

IBI363 has earned fast track designation from the FDA for the treatment of previously treated unresectable advanced melanoma.

This designation follows the fast track designation that was granted to OBX-115 for the same indication in July 2024.

The investigational mRNA therapy BNT111 plus cemiplimab showed better overall response rates compared with historical controls in patients with stage III/IV melanoma refractory to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy.

Vincent Law, research associate at Moffitt Cancer Center, discusses the key takeaways and implications of this research.

During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Michael A. Postow, MD, discussed an indirect treatment comparison of nivolumab plus relatlimab vs nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma in the second article of a 2-part series.