Videos

A panelist discusses how they prioritize specific clinical and laboratory parameters when assessing response to first-line therapy in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) requiring combined phlebotomy and cytoreductive treatment, focusing on hematocrit control, symptom improvement, phlebotomy frequency reduction, and molecular marker trends as key indicators of therapeutic efficacy.

The panelist discusses, for intermediate-stage unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), key clinical pearls include prioritizing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a first-line therapy, with systemic options for TACE-ineligible patients or progression; consider lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab based on liver function and risk factors. Evaluate treatment success via a radiologic response (mRECIST criteria), AFP levels, and toxicity profiles; modify treatment upon radiologic progression, prohibitive toxicity, or declining performance status.

Saeed Sadeghi, MD, discusses the findings on transfusion independence achieved with treatment for patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Jacob E. Berchuck, MD, highlights challenges in adopting liquid biopsy for PSMA expression and its potential to revolutionize precision medicine in prostate cancer.

An expert discusses emerging developments in the use of systemic immunotherapy for recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) from the perspective of a radiation oncologist, highlighting how findings from Liu et al (Lancet, 2024) inform the evolving treatment landscape.

An expert discusses strategies for monitoring response to treatment, including observation, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) titers, and other relevant methods.

An expert discusses the treatment approach for recurrence in Case 1, evaluating the combination of toripalimab + gemcitabine/cisplatin for recurrent disease and considering the potential for re-irradiation, while also reflecting on the treatment strategy in Case 2 and the criteria for determining whether the patient would benefit from additional radiation therapy.

An expert discusses key considerations for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) therapy from the perspective of radiation oncology.

An expert discusses the use of toripalimab in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) through clinical case introductions.

An expert discusses how the positive efficacy findings from the phase 3 RESPONSE trial, showing high rates of hematocrit control and spleen response with ruxolitinib vs standard therapy in hydroxyurea-resistant/intolerant polycythemia vera (PV), have enhanced the treatment approach for patients with inadequate response to hydroxyurea.

An expert discusses how advances in JAK V617F monitoring have improved the assessment of disease status and guided treatment decisions and how risk assessment tools have transformed the ability to optimize treatment selection in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

Panelists discuss how chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy could potentially be moved to earlier lines of treatment in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma based on emerging trial data, improving outcomes through earlier intervention before patients develop treatment resistance.

Ken Kato, MD, PhD, and Harry H. Yoon, MD, MHS, discussed the recent FDA approval of tislelizumab in the first line for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

An expert discusses how recent data on adjuvant anti–PD-1 trials highlight the significance of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), guiding clinical decisions. In muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIBC), event-free survival (EFS) and OS benefits without delaying curative cystectomy are crucial. Adjuvant nivolumab is typically initiated within 12 weeks post cystectomy, considering pathology, recovery, and performance status.

A panelist discusses how the integration of immunotherapy into recurrent/metastatic (R/M) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment requires careful patient monitoring for immune-related adverse events, strategic sequencing with other modalities, consideration of biomarker-guided approaches, and awareness of emerging combination strategies that may further improve outcomes, while ongoing research into novel immunotherapeutic agents, maintenance strategies, and treatment de-escalation protocols aims to optimize efficacy while minimizing toxicity in the evolving landscape of NPC management.

An expert discusses how the updated results from CheckMate 274 (Galsky 2025) include updated disease-free survival (DFS) and interim overall survival (OS), along with other key end points such as nonurothelial tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and second progression-free survival (PFS2). An exploratory analysis assessed outcomes in the muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIBC) subgroup, prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) use, and PD-L1 expression. This analysis was conducted to further evaluate efficacy across subgroups and refine the understanding of treatment impact.

A panelist discusses how immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has revolutionized recurrent/metastatic (R/M) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment through improved survival outcomes demonstrated in landmark trials such as JUPITER-02 with toripalimab and KEYNOTE-590 with pembrolizumab, emphasizing that although most patients benefit regardless of PD-L1 status or Epstein-Barr virus positivity, clinicians must carefully consider patient-specific factors, such as performance status and comorbidities, alongside the management of unique immune-related adverse events through early recognition, established treatment algorithms, and multidisciplinary collaboration to optimize outcomes in this evolving treatment landscape.

A panelist discusses how treatment strategies for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) have evolved, with the updated NCCN guidelines now recommending toripalimab plus gemcitabine/cisplatin as category 1 first-line therapy for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) disease based on the JUPITER-02 trial results showing significantly improved 4-year overall survival (OS) rates of 48% vs 27.7% with chemotherapy alone, while emphasizing that treatment decisions should consider patient-specific factors, such as Epstein-Barr virus status, prior treatments, and comorbidities, alongside nonpatient factors, including drug accessibility, need for rapid response, and capacity to manage immune-related adverse events.

A panelist discusses how a 48-year-old man with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) presents with nasal congestion, epistaxis, neck swelling, and unilateral hearing issues, highlighting the importance of recognizing these symptoms in patients with a family history of NPC.

An expert discusses how CheckMate 274 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating adjuvant nivolumab vs placebo in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) after surgery. It enrolled 709 patients, assessing disease-free survival and overall survival as primary end points.

A panelist discusses how nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) differs from other head and neck malignancies through its distinct geographical distribution, Epstein-Barr virus association, unique genetic profile, and characteristic clinical presentation, including early lymph node involvement.

Panelists discuss how RATIONALE-305 represents a significant advancement in first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer with tislelizumab demonstrating meaningful survival benefits while maintaining a tolerable safety profile that could potentially reshape standard clinical practice.

Panelists discuss how the optimal sequencing between available therapies for advanced gastric cancer remains challenging but should be guided by patient-specific factors, prior treatment response, and molecular characteristics of the tumor.

Panelists discuss how the RATIONALE-305 trial revealed a manageable adverse event profile for tislelizumab plus chemotherapy despite increased rates of neutropenia and anemia compared to placebo plus chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients.

Panelists discuss how RATIONALE-305 trial data shows promising updated overall survival benefits for patients receiving tislelizumab plus chemotherapy compared to placebo plus chemotherapy in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

An expert discusses alternative treatment options for a symptomatic patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and highlights the caveats around the data from the Phase 3 ALSYMPCA study of radium-223, including its conduct in an era prior to the introduction of abiraterone (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZA).

A panelist discusses how emerging research in RCC treatment encompasses several promising investigational approaches that could potentially reshape the therapeutic landscape, from novel drug combinations to innovative treatment strategies that may address current gaps in care.

An expert discusses how recent analyses from the REFLECT trial in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) demonstrate that both achieving objective response and greater depth of response correlate with improved survival outcomes. The depth of response serves as a potentially valuable early biomarker for prognosis and treatment decisions, with deeper responses associated with better overall survival among responders.

An expert discusses how treatment selection for first-line (1L) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requires careful evaluation of multiple factors, including liver function (Child-Pugh status), ECOG performance status, tumor burden, and presence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. In reviewing individual cases, clinicians assess liver enzyme levels, α-fetoprotein values, radiographic findings, and comorbidities.

A panelist discusses how managing adverse events associated with TKIs and belzutifan requires a proactive approach encompassing prevention strategies, regular monitoring, dose modifications when needed (particularly for combination regimens), and evidence-based mitigation techniques, while considering the distinct toxicity profiles of each agent and the impact of dose adjustments on treatment efficacy.